While dermoscopy has become standard procedure in the diagnosis and management of patients with skin lesions, clinical and dermoscopic photographic documentation of lesions scheduled for biopsy are only infrequently performed in everyday practice [1-7].Herein we present a case of a young woman who developed a re-pigmentation within the scar of an excised primary melanoma and highlight the importance of pre-surgical clinical photography in her management.
Case Presentation
A 23-year-old woman with multiple nevi presented because of a brown, sharply demarcated plaque on her left shoulder (Figure 1A arrow), which she recently noticed. Upon dermoscopy the lesion exhibited irregularly sized brown globules and a central dark-brown structureless area (Figure 1B). Based on this pattern, a diagnosis of melanoma was suspected and the lesion was excised. However, before excision, a clinical overview of her back, a digital dermoscopic image of the lesion, as well as some of the surrounding nevi was performed.
Histopathology confirmed the clinical suspect and revealed a melanoma (0.5 mm tumor thickness, mitosis < 1/mm2). Imaging examinations were unremarkable and re-excision with 1 cm safety margins was performed. Histopathology of the re-excision showed no further tumoral evidence.At follow-up 6 months later, a linear brown pigmentation extending from the lower border into the scar of the primary tumor was noticed. Dermoscopically, a structureless brown to gray pigmentation was observed (Figure 2B arrow). Side-by-side review of the clinical overview image taken at baseline and at the current visit (Figure 3) revealed a small pigmented nevus in about 1 cm distance at the lower area of the primary melanoma (Figure 3A red arrow). Based on this observation, a diagnosis of an incompletely removed nevus during the surgical procedure of the re-excision of the primary melanoma was made and the lesion was scheduled for digital follow-up. At follow-up 6 and 12 months later, the lesions remained completely unchanged.
Ferrara et al. showed that the addition of clinical information including pre-surgical images improves the diagnostic accuracy and confidence of pathologists when dealing with melanocytic skin tumors that are difficult to interpret. Moreover, Bauer and coworkers reported that review of dermoscopic images can help in avoiding sampling errors in histopathology [1-7].Our case adds further support to the value of pre-surgical photographic documentation of the clinical management of patients with pigmented skin lesion. In our patient, the diagnosis of an incompletely removed nevus could only be made because review of the pre-surgical images revealed the presence of a small pigmented nevus at the side, at which the re-excision of the primary melanoma had been performed. In fact, the clinically suspected diagnosis of persisting nevus within a scar was further confirmed by digital monitoring revealing no canges over a follow-up period of one year.Hence, we suggest that pre-surgical digital photography become a routine procedure in the management of patients with skin tumors.
Authors: Gerardo Ferrara; Giuseppe Argenziano; H Peter Soyer; Rosamaria Corona; Francesco Sera; Bruno Brunetti; Lorenzo Cerroni; Sergio Chimenti; Laila El Shabrawi-Caelen; Angela Ferrari; Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof; Steven Kaddu; Domenico Piccolo; Massimiliano Scalvenzi; Stefania Staibano; Ingrid H Wolf; Gaetano De Rosa Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-09-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: R Corona; A Mele; M Amini; G De Rosa; G Coppola; P Piccardi; M Fucci; P Pasquini; T Faraggiana Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1996-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Gerardo Ferrara; Giuseppe Argenziano; Lorenzo Cerroni; Francesco Cusano; Arturo Di Blasi; Carmelo Urso; H Peter Soyer Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.184
Authors: Gerardo Ferrara; Zsolt Argenyi; Giuseppe Argenziano; Rino Cerio; Lorenzo Cerroni; Arturo Di Blasi; Elisa A A Feudale; Caterina M Giorgio; Cesare Massone; Oscar Nappi; Carlo Tomasini; Carmelo Urso; Iris Zalaudek; Harald Kittler; H Peter Soyer Journal: PLoS One Date: 2009-04-30 Impact factor: 3.240