| Literature DB >> 28515835 |
Franklin Lime-Ma1, Joshua A Cotter2, Evan E Schick2.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to elucidate the impact of acute hyperglycemia on skeletal muscle strength, power, and endurance. Ten male collegiate athletes (age 21.5 ± 1.5 years, height 186 ± 2.03 cm, body mass 108.8 ± 7.6 kg) participated in 2 testing sessions, separated by 7 days and randomized for either high glucose (HG) or control (C) treatment conditions. HG consumed a high glucose drink (2 g glucose/kg body weight) while controls consumed an isocaloric nutrition bar (40% protein, 30% fat, and 30% carbohydrate). Blood glucose (BC) levels for HG and C were tested at 0 (basal) and 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes (mins) post consumption. At 30 mins post consumption, HG and C muscular strength was assessed by a 1RM bench press (BP) test followed by lower body power at 60 mins via vertical jump test. Muscular endurance was examined with a 3-set-to-failure BP test at 90 mins. HG exhibited significantly greater BC values (p<0.05) at the 30, 60, 90, and 120 minute time points. HG glucose area under the curve was significantly greater (p<0.05) than C and was positively correlated with %body fat, a finding that trended towards significance, r = 0.587, n= 10, p = 0.074. There were no between group differences in maximal strength, power or muscular endurance. Although performance measures were unaffected by acute hyperglycemia, acute hyperglycemia can be induced and maintained in healthy, active and young subjects. Despite regular physical activity, excess body fat negatively impacts glucose metabolism.Entities:
Keywords: Resistance training; diabetes; glycemic control; health
Year: 2017 PMID: 28515835 PMCID: PMC5421977
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Exerc Sci ISSN: 1939-795X
Figure 1Whole-body glycemic response for both HG and C during performance testing over 120 minutes. A, HG displayed significantly (p<0.05) greater blood glucose values from 30 min to 120 min compared to C. B, total glucose load as measured by area under the curve (AUC), was significantly (p<0.05) greater for HG over the 120 min time span. Values expressed as mean ± SEM. * indicates a significant difference compared to controls.
Figure 2Muscular strength, power and endurance measures in both the HG and C groups. There were no significant differences in strength (A), power (B), or endurance (C) between HG and C. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 3The relationship between total blood glucose concentration (AUC) and % body fat (%BF) during the 120 min glucose challenge. A Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient revealed a positive relationship between glucose HG AUC and %BF which trended towards significance, r=0.587, n=10, p=0.074.