| Literature DB >> 28515821 |
Dagmar F Hernandez-Suarez1, Denada Palm2, Francisco Lopez-Menendez2, Marcel Mesa Pabon3, Angel Lopez-Candales3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) velocity of propagation (Vp) has been shown to be inversely related to the LV relaxation time constant. We sought to examine Vp from a group of chronic pulmonary hypertension (cPH) patients and compare these values to Vp obtained in normal individuals and patients with known LV diastolic dysfunction (LVDD).Entities:
Keywords: Cardiac hemodynamics; Echo-Doppler; Left ventricle; Propagation velocity; Relaxation; Right ventricular dysfunction
Year: 2017 PMID: 28515821 PMCID: PMC5421485 DOI: 10.14740/cr541w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiol Res ISSN: 1923-2829
Figure 1A representative normal color M-mode image is shown with a temporal resolution of approximately 5 ms, a spatial resolution (depth) of approximately 1 mm and a velocity resolution of approximately 4 cm/s, according to the Nyquist limit. The resultant spatio-temporal velocity information is expressed as a distance to time ratio more commonly expressed as cm/s.
Relevant Echocardiographic Data of the Studied Population
| Variables | Group I (n = 15) | Group II (n = 27) | Group III (n = 27) | Group IV (n = 66) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVESV (cm3) | 40 ± 15 | 40 ± 27 | 73 ± 54§ | 34 ± 17 | < 0.01 |
| LVEDV (cm3) | 119 ± 30 | 112 ± 30 | 145 ± 66¶ | 81 ± 35β | < 0.01 |
| LVEF (%) | 67 ± 7 | 67 ± 13 | 57 ± 13§ | 59 ± 9β | < 0.01 |
| MA E/A ratio | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.1† | 1.7 ± 0.7§ | 1.2 ± 0.6 | < 0.01 |
| MV E/MA E' ratio | 7 ± 3 | 9 ± 3 | 17 ± 6§ | 10 ± 12 | < 0.01 |
LV: left ventricle; LVESV: LV end-systolic volume; LVEDV: LV end-diastolic volume; LVEF: LV ejection fraction; MA: mitral annulus; MV: mitral valve. †Bonferroni test indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) between group II and groups I, III, IV. ¶Group III and group II, §Group III and groups I, II, IV and βGroup IV and groups I, II, II.
Figure 2(a) Box plot representation of Vp values from all four groups. Bonferroni test indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) between: (#) PAH and control, LVDD 1, LVDD 2 and (%) control and LVDD 1, LVDD 2 groups. (b) Box plot representation of PCWP values from all four groups. Bonferroni test indicates significant differences (P < 0.05) between: (^)LVDD 2 and control, LVDD 1, PAH and (*) LVDD 1 and control, PAH groups.
Figure 3Representative color M-mode Vp images for the four studied groups.
Figure 4Scatter plot graphs showing the relationship between Vp and PCWP for all study groups.
Simple Linear Regression Analysis to Determine the Association Between Important Echocardiographic Variables
| Variables | Coefficient (P-value) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | |
| Vp vs. PCWP | - 0.8213 (0.46) | - 1.4200 (< 0.01) | - 1.5520 (< 0.01) | - 3.2673 (< 0.01) |
| Vp vs. MV E/MA E' ratio | 1.1685 (0.22) | - 0.8431 (0.12) | - 0.2637 (0.64) | - 0.2192 (0.18) |
| Vp vs. MA E' | - 0.5117 (0.56) | 1.9742 (0.02) | 2.2038 (0.29) | - 0.1049 (0.41) |
| MV E/Vp vs. MV E/MA E' ratio | 0.1188 (< 0.01) | 0.1416 (< 0.01) | 0.1257 (< 0.01) | 0.0146 (< 0.01) |
Vp: velocity of propagation; PCWP: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; MA: mitral annulus; MV: mitral valve.