Literature DB >> 28515818

Pharmacogenomic Testing for Psychotropic Medication Selection: A Systematic Review of the Assurex GeneSight Psychotropic Test.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A large proportion of the Ontario population lives with a diagnosed mental illness. Nearly 5% of Ontarians have major depressive disorder, and another 5% have another type of depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, or some other disorder not otherwise specified. Medications are commonly used to treat mental illness, but choosing the right medication for each patient is challenging, and more than 40% of patients discontinue their medication within 90 days because of adverse effects or lack of response. The Assurex GeneSight Psychotropic test is a pharmacogenomic panel that provides clinicians with a report to guide medication selection that is unique to each patient based on their individual genetic profile. However, it is uncertain whether guided treatment using GeneSight is effective compared with unguided treatment (usual care).
METHODS: We performed a systematic review to identify English-language studies published before February 22, 2016, that compared GeneSight-guided care and usual care among people with mood disorders, anxiety, or schizophrenia. Primary outcomes of interest were prevention of suicide, remission of depression symptoms, response to depression therapy, depression score, and quality of life. Secondary outcomes of interest were impact on therapeutic decisions and patient and clinician satisfaction. Risk of bias was evaluated, and the quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group criteria.
RESULTS: Four studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies used a version of GeneSight that included the CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP1A2, SLC6A4, and HTR2A genes; one of the studies also included CYP2C9. Patients who received the GeneSight test to guide psychotropic medication selection had improved response to depression treatment, greater improvements in measures of depression, and greater patient and clinician satisfaction compared with patients who received treatment as usual. We observed no differences in rates of complete remission from depression. The findings were based on GRADE assessment of low to very low quality evidence, and the body of evidence had several limitations: the included studies used an older version of GeneSight and were limited to a population with major depression, so results may not be generalizable to other versions of the test or different populations such as patients with anxiety or schizophrenia.
CONCLUSIONS: There is uncertainty about the use of GeneSight Psychotropic pharmacogenomic genetic panel to guide medication selection. It was associated with improvements in some patient outcomes, but not others. As well, our confidence in these findings is low because of limitations in the body of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28515818      PMCID: PMC5433545     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser        ISSN: 1915-7398


  30 in total

1.  GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology.

Authors:  Gordon H Guyatt; Andrew D Oxman; Holger J Schünemann; Peter Tugwell; Andre Knottnerus
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-12-24       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotics in diverse human populations.

Authors:  Eleanor Murphy; Francis J McMahon
Journal:  Discov Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.970

Review 3.  Pharmacogenetics of major depressive disorder: top genes and pathways toward clinical applications.

Authors:  Chiara Fabbri; Alessandro Serretti
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Utility of integrated pharmacogenomic testing to support the treatment of major depressive disorder in a psychiatric outpatient setting.

Authors:  Daniel K Hall-Flavin; Joel G Winner; Josiah D Allen; Joseph M Carhart; Brian Proctor; Karen A Snyder; Maureen S Drews; Linda L Eisterhold; Jennifer Geske; David A Mrazek
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Biological variations in depression and anxiety between East and West.

Authors:  Po-Yu Chen; Sheng-Chang Wang; Russell E Poland; Keh-Ming Lin
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.243

6.  Clinical Utility of Combinatorial Pharmacogenomics-Guided Antidepressant Therapy: Evidence from Three Clinical Studies.

Authors:  C Anthony Altar; Joseph Carhart; Josiah D Allen; Daniel Hall-Flavin; Joel Winner; Bryan Dechairo
Journal:  Mol Neuropsychiatry       Date:  2015-07-31

7.  Pharmacogenetics in major depression: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tomihisa Niitsu; Chiara Fabbri; Francesco Bentini; Alessandro Serretti
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.067

8.  Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) clinical guidelines for the management of major depressive disorder in adults. III. Pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  Raymond W Lam; Sidney H Kennedy; Sophie Grigoriadis; Roger S McIntyre; Roumen Milev; Rajamannar Ramasubbu; Sagar V Parikh; Scott B Patten; Arun V Ravindran
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 4.839

9.  Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depression.

Authors:  A John Rush; Madhukar H Trivedi; Stephen R Wisniewski; Jonathan W Stewart; Andrew A Nierenberg; Michael E Thase; Louise Ritz; Melanie M Biggs; Diane Warden; James F Luther; Kathy Shores-Wilson; George Niederehe; Maurizio Fava
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2006-03-23       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Psychiatric pharmacogenomics predicts health resource utilization of outpatients with anxiety and depression.

Authors:  J Winner; J D Allen; C Anthony Altar; A Spahic-Mihajlovic
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 6.222

View more
  7 in total

1.  Multi-gene Pharmacogenomic Testing That Includes Decision-Support Tools to Guide Medication Selection for Major Depression: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2021-08-12

2.  Clinical utility of pharmacogenetic testing in children and adolescents with severe mental disorders.

Authors:  Hilario Blasco-Fontecilla
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 3.575

3.  Preliminary Clinical Investigation of Combinatorial Pharmacogenomic Testing for the Optimized Treatment of Depression: A Randomized Single-Blind Study.

Authors:  Xiaoxiao Shan; Wenli Zhao; Yan Qiu; Haishan Wu; Jindong Chen; Yiru Fang; Wenbin Guo; Lehua Li
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 4.  Challenges and Future Prospects of Precision Medicine in Psychiatry.

Authors:  Mirko Manchia; Claudia Pisanu; Alessio Squassina; Bernardo Carpiniello
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2020-04-23

5.  Association between the SLC6A4 gene and schizophrenia: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feng-Ling Xu; Bao-Jie Wang; Jun Yao
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 2.570

6.  A Systematic Review of the Value Assessment Frameworks Used within Health Technology Assessment of Omics Technologies and Their Actual Adoption from HTA Agencies.

Authors:  Ilda Hoxhaj; Laurenz Govaerts; Steven Simoens; Walter Van Dyck; Isabelle Huys; Iñaki Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea; Stefania Boccia
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Effect of Pharmacogenetic-Based Decision Support Tools in Improving Depression Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Shimaa Aboelbaha; Monica Zolezzi; Hazem Elewa
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 2.570

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.