| Literature DB >> 28515572 |
Carlo Santoro1, Alexey Serov1, Rohan Gokhale1, Santiago Rojas-Carbonell1, Lydia Stariha1, Jonathan Gordon1, Kateryna Artyushkova1, Plamen Atanassov1.
Abstract
Different iron-based cathode catalysts have been studied for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in neutral media and then applied into microbial fuel cells (MFC). The catalysts have been synthesized using sacrificial support method (SSM) using eight different organic precursors named Niclosamide, Ricobendazole, Guanosine, Succinylsulfathiazole, Sulfacetamide, Quinine, Sulfadiazine and Pyrazinamide. Linear Sweep Voltammetry (LSV) curves were obtained for the catalysts using a O2 saturated in 0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer and 0.1 M KCl solution and a Rotating Ring Disk Electrode (RRDE) setup in order to study the ORR characteristics. Additionally, we analyze the peroxide yield obtained for each catalyst which helps us determine the reaction kinetics. Those catalysts have been mixed with activated carbon (AC), carbon black (CB) and PTFE and pressed on a metallic mesh forming a pellet-like gas diffusion electrode (GDE). Results showed that Fe-Ricobendazole, Fe-Niclosamide and Fe-Pyrazinamide had the highest cathode polarization curves and highest power densities output that was above 200 μWcm-2. Fe-Ricobendazole, Fe-Niclosamide, Fe-Pyrazinamide, Fe-Guanosine Fe-Succinylsulfathiazole and Fe-Sulfacetamide outperformed compared to Pt cathode. Fe-Sulfadiazene and Fe-Quinine performed better than AC used as control but less than Pt. Correlation of surface composition with performance showed that power density achieved is directly related to the total amount of nitrogen, and in particularly, N coordinated to metal and pyridinic and pyrrolic types while larger amounts of graphitic nitrogen result in worse performance.Entities:
Keywords: Microbial fuel cell; ORR; PGM-free; Power generation; Surface chemistry
Year: 2017 PMID: 28515572 PMCID: PMC5310117 DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.12.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Appl Catal B ISSN: 0926-3373 Impact factor: 19.503
Fig. 1Structural formula of organic precursors: Guanosine (a), Sulfadiazine (b), Pyrazinamide (c), Niclosamide (d), Sulfacetamide (e), Ricobendazole (f), Quinine (g) and Succinylsulfathiazole (h).
Fig. 2SEM images at different resolutions of Fe-Ricobendazole.
Atomic% of N and relative% of different types of nitrogens derived from XPS N 1s spectra.
| N 1s | imine | N pyridinic | N-Me | N pyrrolic | N graphitic | NO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| % | % | % | % | % | % | % | |
| Ricobendazole | 2.7 | 6.8 | 20.9 | 15.2 | 38.9 | 13 | 5.2 |
| Niclosamide | 2.7 | 3.8 | 22.9 | 12.4 | 40.4 | 14.3 | 6.2 |
| Pyrazinamide | 2.4 | 8.1 | 21.4 | 14.3 | 37.7 | 13 | 5.5 |
| Guanosine | 3.3 | 5.3 | 24.1 | 13.4 | 39.2 | 13.3 | 4.8 |
| Sulfacetamide | 2.3 | 4.5 | 19.5 | 10.9 | 36.1 | 21.6 | 7.4 |
| Succinylsulfath. | 3.2 | 7.5 | 20.9 | 14.5 | 33.4 | 16.9 | 6.7 |
| Sulfadiazene | 2.5 | 4.5 | 19.9 | 13.3 | 35.4 | 19.1 | 7.7 |
| Quinine | 1.3 | 2.6 | 18.5 | 7.4 | 39.3 | 23 | 9.3 |
Fig. 3(a) LSV of Fe based catalysts in comparison with AC in O2 saturated electrolyte (0.1 M K-PB and 0.1 M KCl) at a rotation rate of 1600 rpm. (b) % H2O2 produced by the catalysts at different potentials (c) number of electrons transferred in the ORR kinetics of the Fe-catalysts.
Fig. 4Cathode open circuit potential (OCP) (a) and linear sweep voltammetry (LSV) of cathodes in phosphate buffer (PBS) (b).
Fig. 5Overall MFC polarization curves (a), power curves (b) and cathode (c) and anode (d) polarization trend.
Fig. 6Relationship between current density measured during the RRDE tests (catalyst) and during the cathode LSV (a). Relationship between current density measured during the RRDE tests (catalyst) and during the cathode LSV with the power density achieved in MFC (b).
Fig. 7Principal Component Analysis for the Fe-N-C catalysts prepared with different organic precursors (a).
Fig. 8Relationship between power density and: a) total N (%); b) N-pyridinic (rel.%); c) N-pyrrole (rel.%); d) Nx-Me (rel.%) and e) N-Graphitic (rel.%).
Cost considerations for Fe and Pt based catalyst.
| μWcm−2 | W m−2 | m2 W−1 | US$ g−1 | g W−1 | US$ W−1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricobendazole | 209 | 2.09 | 0.48 | 3.4 | 9.57 | 32.5 |
| Niclosamide | 206 | 2.06 | 0.49 | 3.4 | 9.71 | 33.0 |
| Pyrazinamide | 202 | 2.02 | 0.50 | 3.4 | 9.90 | 33.7 |
| Guanosine | 199 | 1.99 | 0.50 | 3.4 | 10.05 | 34.2 |
| Sulfacetamide | 187 | 1.87 | 0.53 | 3.4 | 10.70 | 36.4 |
| Succinylsulfat. | 172 | 1.72 | 0.58 | 3.4 | 11.63 | 39.5 |
| Sulfadiazene | 163 | 1.63 | 0.61 | 3.4 | 12.27 | 41.7 |
| Quinine | 152 | 1.52 | 0.66 | 3.4 | 13.16 | 44.7 |
| Platinum | 171 | 1.71 | 0.58 | 150 | 11.70 | 1754.4 |