Literature DB >> 28514897

Biomaterials and Bioactive Agents in Spinal Fusion.

Rui M Duarte1,2,3,4, Pedro Varanda2,3,4, Rui L Reis3,5, Ana Rita C Duarte3,5, Jorge Correia-Pinto1,2,3,6.   

Abstract

Management of degenerative spine pathologies frequently leads to the need for spinal fusion (SF), where bone growth is induced toward stabilization of the interventioned spine. Autologous bone graft (ABG) remains the gold-standard inducer, whereas new bone graft substitutes attempt to achieve effective de novo bone formation and solid fusion. Limited fusion outcomes have driven motivation for more sophisticated and multidisciplinary solutions, involving new biomaterials and/or biologics, through innovative delivery platforms. The present review will analyze the most recent body of literature that is focused on new approaches for consistent bone fusion of spinal vertebrae, including the development of new biomaterials that pursue physical and chemical aptitudes; the delivery of growth factors (GF) to accelerate new bone formation; and the use of cells to improve functional bone development. Bone graft substitutes currently in clinical practice, such as demineralized bone matrix and ceramics, are still used as a starting point for the study of new bioactive agents. Polyesters such as polycaprolactone and polylactic acid arise as platforms for the development of composites, where a mineral element and cell/GF constitute the delivery system. Exciting fusion outcomes were obtained in several small and large animal models with these. On what regards bioactive agents, mesenchymal stem cells, preferentially derived from the bone marrow or adipose tissue, were studied in this context. Autologous and allogeneic approaches, as well as osteogenically differentiated cells, have been tested. These cell sources have further been genetically engineered for specific GF expression. Nevertheless, results on fusion efficacy with cells have been inconsistent. On the other hand, the delivery of GF (most commonly bone morphogenetic protein-2 [BMP-2]) has provided favorable outcomes. Complications related to burst release and dosing are still the target of research through the development of controlled release systems or alternative GF such as Nel-like molecule-1 (NELL-1), Oxysterols, or COMP-Ang1. Promising solutions with new biomaterial and GF compositions are becoming closer to the human patient, as these evidence high-fusion performance, while offering cost and safety advantages. The use of cells has not yet proved solid benefits, whereas a further understanding of cell behavior remains a challenge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adult stem cells; growth factors; polymeric scaffolds; spinal fusion

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28514897     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2017.0072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  9 in total

Review 1.  Lumbar interbody fusion: recent advances in surgical techniques and bone healing strategies.

Authors:  Bin Meng; Joshua Bunch; Douglas Burton; Jinxi Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Regenerative Medicine Strategies in Biomedical Implants.

Authors:  Divya Rani Bijukumar; Clay McGeehan; Mathew T Mathew
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 3.  Use of graft materials and biologics in spine deformity surgery: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Ki-Eun Chang; Mohamed Kamal Mesregah; Zoe Fresquez; Eloise W Stanton; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2022-06-23

4.  A Pre-clinical Standard Operating Procedure for Evaluating Orthobiologics in an In Vivo Rat Spinal Fusion Model.

Authors:  Andrew L Alejo; Scott McDermott; Yusuf Khalil; Hope C Ball; Gabrielle T Robinson; Ernesto Solorzano; Amanda M Alejo; Jacob Douglas; Trinity K Samson; Jesse W Young; Fayez F Safadi
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-05

Review 5.  Spinal Biologics in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Y Chang; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2018-04-05

6.  Comparing cellular bone matrices for posterolateral spinal fusion in a rat model.

Authors:  Cliff Lin; Nianli Zhang; Erik I Waldorff; Paolo Punsalan; David Wang; Eric Semler; James T Ryaby; Jung Yoo; Brian Johnstone
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2020-03-15

7.  Epidermal growth factor enhances spinal fusion: Posterolateral lumbar fusion model on rats.

Authors:  Engin Çetin; İsmail Daldal; Ali Eren; Saadet Özen Akarca Dizakar; Suna Ömeroğlu; Bora Uzuner; Hakan Hamdi Çelik; Hasan Hüseyin Saygılı; Benat Koçkar; Alpaslan Şenköylü
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 1.511

8.  Patient-Specific Variations in Local Strain Patterns on the Surface of a Trussed Titanium Interbody Cage.

Authors:  Arjan C Y Loenen; Jérôme Noailly; Keita Ito; Paul C Willems; Jacobus J Arts; Bert van Rietbergen
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-11

9.  Peptide Enhanced Bone Graft Substitute Presents Improved Short-Term Increase in Bone Volume and Construct Stiffness Compared to Iliac Crest Autologous Bone in an Ovine Lumbar Interbody Fusion Model.

Authors:  Arjan C Y Loenen; Jerome Connor; Scott Johnson; Katherine Davis; Nolan Hannigan; Tristan Barnes; Jacobus J Arts; Bert van Rietbergen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-01-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.