Literature DB >> 28514324

Use of the Fluid Challenge in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Systematic Review.

Antonio Messina1, Federico Longhini, Corinne Coppo, Aline Pagni, Ramona Lungu, Chiara Ronco, Marco Ambrogio Cattaneo, Simone Dore, Giovanni Sotgiu, Paolo Navalesi.   

Abstract

The fluid challenge (FC) aims at identifying patients in whom fluid administration improves hemodynamics. Although the FC has been extensively studied, the implementation and definition of improvement are not standardized. This systematic review of studies published between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 2014 characterizes these key components of the FC for critically ill adult patients, as described in the medical literature in the last 20 years. A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane. For each study, data were collected on study design, study size, study setting, patient population, and how the FC was administered. Eligibility criteria for FC were (1) the infusion of a definite quantity of fluid, (2) of a specific type, (3) in a fixed time period (expressed as either span or infusion rate), (4) with a defined hemodynamic variable as the target, and (5) for a predetermined threshold. One hundred fifty-seven full-text manuscripts were extracted from 870 potentially relevant studies. The inclusion criteria were met by 71 studies including 3617 patients. Sixty-six studies were from a single center and 45 were prospective observational in format. The most common amount infused was 500 cc, used by 55 (77.5%) studies. The most commonly infused fluids were colloids (62.0%). In 43 (60.5%) studies, the FC was administered between 20 and 30 minutes. A positive response to fluid administration was defined as an increase ≥15% of cardiac index or cardiac output in 44 (62.6%) studies. Static or dynamic physiologic indices were utilized in a minority of studies (16.9%) and safety limits for interrupting the FC are adopted in 4 (5.6%) studies only. This systematic review indicates that the FC most commonly consists in infusing 500 mL of crystalloids or colloids in 20-30 minutes, and considered an increase in cardiac index ≥15% as a positive response. However, definite standards for FC administration and evaluation remain undefined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28514324     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  10 in total

Review 1.  Assessing dynamic fluid-responsiveness using transthoracic echocardiography in intensive care.

Authors:  N Desai; D Garry
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2018-03-30

Review 2.  Fluid challenge in critically ill patients receiving haemodynamic monitoring: a systematic review and comparison of two decades.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Lorenzo Calabrò; Luca Pugliese; Aulona Lulja; Alexandra Sopuch; Daniela Rosalba; Emanuela Morenghi; Glenn Hernandez; Xavier Monnet; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 19.334

3.  N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide for predicting fluid challenge in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Hui-Bin Huang; Biao Xu; Guang-Yun Liu; Bin Du
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-06

Review 4.  What is the evidence base for fluid resuscitation in acute medicine? .

Authors:  Adam Seccombe; Elizabeth Sapey
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.659

Review 5.  Fluid administration for acute circulatory dysfunction using basic monitoring.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Francesca Collino; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

6.  Impact of Intravenous Fluid Challenge Infusion Time on Macrocirculation and Endothelial Glycocalyx in Surgical and Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Jiri Pouska; Vaclav Tegl; David Astapenko; Vladimir Cerny; Christian Lehmann; Jan Benes
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Sigh maneuver to enhance assessment of fluid responsiveness during pressure support ventilation.

Authors:  Antonio Messina; Davide Colombo; Federico Lorenzo Barra; Gianmaria Cammarota; Giacomo De Mattei; Federico Longhini; Stefano Romagnoli; Francesco DellaCorte; Daniel De Backer; Maurizio Cecconi; Paolo Navalesi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Assessing Fluid Resuscitation in Adults with Sepsis Who Are Not Mechanically Ventilated: a Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies.

Authors:  Adam Seccombe; Lauren McCluskey; Hannah Moorey; Daniel Lasserson; Elizabeth Sapey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Development and comparison of an esophageal Doppler monitoring-based treatment algorithm with a heart rate and blood pressure-based treatment algorithm for goal-directed fluid therapy in anesthetized dogs: A pilot study.

Authors:  Inken Sabine Henze; Laura Hilpert; Annette P N Kutter
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-10-03

10.  Characteristics of resuscitation, and association between use of dynamic tests of fluid responsiveness and outcomes in septic patients: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study in Argentina.

Authors:  Arnaldo Dubin; Cecilia Loudet; Vanina S Kanoore Edul; Javier Osatnik; Fernando Ríos; Daniela Vásquez; Mario Pozo; Bernardo Lattanzio; Fernando Pálizas; Francisco Klein; Damián Piezny; Paolo N Rubatto Birri; Graciela Tuhay; Analía García; Analía Santamaría; Graciela Zakalik; Cecilia González; Elisa Estenssoro
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 6.925

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.