| Literature DB >> 28512865 |
Francesca Palandri1, Mario Tiribelli2, Giulia Benevolo3, Alessia Tieghi4, Francesco Cavazzini5, Massimo Breccia6, Micaela Bergamaschi7, Nicola Sgherza8, Nicola Polverelli9, Monica Crugnola10, Alessandro Isidori11, Gianni Binotto12, Florian H Heidel13, Francesco Buccisano14, Bruno Martino15, Roberto Latagliata6, Marco Spinsanti1, Lydia Kallenberg13, Giuseppe Alberto Palumbo16, Elisabetta Abruzzese17, Luigi Scaffidi18, Antonio Cuneo5, Michele Cavo1, Nicola Vianelli1, Massimiliano Bonifacio18.
Abstract
Patients with myelofibrosis at intermediate-1 risk according to the International Prognostic Score System are projected to a relatively long survival; nonetheless, they may carry significant splenomegaly and/or systemic constitutional symptoms that hamper quality of life and require treatment. Since registrative COMFORT studies included only patients at intermediate-2/high International Prognostic Score System risk, safety and efficacy data in intermediate-1 patients are limited. We report on 70 intermediate-1 patients treated with ruxolitinib according to standard clinical practice that were evaluated for response using the 2013 IWG-MRT criteria. At 6 months, rates of spleen and symptoms response were 54.7% and 80% in 64 and 65 evaluable patients, respectively. At 3 months, ruxolitinib-induced grade 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 40.6% and 2.9% of evaluable patients, respectively. Notably, 11 (15.9%) patients experienced at least one infectious event ≥grade 2. Most (82.6%) patients were still on therapy after a median follow-up of 27 months. These data support the need for standardized guidelines that may guide the decision to initiate ruxolitinib therapy in this risk category, balancing benefit expectations and potential adverse effects.Entities:
Keywords: IPSS; MF; intermediate-1 risk; myelofibrosis; ruxolitinib
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28512865 DOI: 10.1002/hon.2429
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hematol Oncol ISSN: 0278-0232 Impact factor: 5.271