Literature DB >> 28512731

Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: How to Do It Right.

Juan D Garisto, Laurence Klotz.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy affecting men. There has been a nearly 70% increase in new prostate cancer cases, mostly classified as low risk, that have been diagnosed in early stages as a consequence of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Data regarding the natural history of this disease confirm the clinical insignificance of low-grade prostate cancer, which is associated with scant or no metastatic dissemination. Active surveillance is a conservative management approach, conducted for those patients with "low-risk" or "favorable-risk" disease, which avoids long-term adverse effects on the patient's quality of life. It is characterized by a routine protocol of close monitoring with digital rectal examination, periodic biopsy, and serial PSA testing. As defined by D'Amico, active surveillance is broadly appropriate for men with a Gleason score of 6 or less and a PSA level of less than 10 ng/mL. Typically, Gleason pattern 3 disease lacks the common genetic aberrancies of a true cancer. An essential element of the active surveillance approach is early recognition of higher-risk disease, which is diagnosed by systematic biopsy in 30% of patients who initiate active surveillance with low-risk disease. Also, a small group of patients have molecular alterations that can cause progression to more aggressive disease; these men can be switched to immediate treatment if such progression is detected. Oncologic outcomes for active surveillance cohorts have shown the long-term safety of this approach, with a cancer-specific mortality rate of 3% at 10 to 15 years. In this review of active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer, we will discuss the rationality of this approach, the biological evidence for employing active surveillance in Gleason pattern 3 and 4 prostate cancer, patient selection for active surveillance, clinical trial data on active surveillance, and the role of prostate cancer biomarkers and imaging studies (MRI) for clinical decision making in patients with low-risk disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28512731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)        ISSN: 0890-9091            Impact factor:   2.990


  14 in total

1.  Androgen Deprivation Therapy Potentiates the Efficacy of Vascular Targeted Photodynamic Therapy of Prostate Cancer Xenografts.

Authors:  Kwanghee Kim; Philip A Watson; Souhil Lebdai; Sylvia Jebiwott; Alexander J Somma; Stephen La Rosa; Dipti Mehta; Katie S Murray; Hans Lilja; David Ulmert; Sebastien Monette; Avigdor Scherz; Jonathan A Coleman
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  [Active surveillance in prostate cancer].

Authors:  E Erne; S Kaufmann; K Nikolaou; A Stenzl; J Bedke
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 3.  Cognitive and Psychological Impacts of Different Treatment Options for Prostate Cancer: A Critical Analysis.

Authors:  Konstantina G Yiannopoulou; Aikaterini I Anastasiou; Konstantinos Kontoangelos; Charalambos Papageorgiou; Ioannis P Anastasiou
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2020-12-18

Review 4.  Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Profiling for Precision Medicine in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Amilcar Flores-Morales; Diego Iglesias-Gato
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  The future of active surveillance.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-04

6.  A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA.

Authors:  Igor Brikun; Deborah Nusskern; Andrew Decatus; Eric Harvey; Lin Li; Diha Freije
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 6.551

7.  Changes in risk-group stratification of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy at the Southern Alberta Institute of Urology over time.

Authors:  Benjamin Shiff; Premal Patel; Kiril Trpkov; Geoffrey T Gotto
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-03-20

Review 8.  Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review of the Current Role and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Katarzyna Sklinda; Bartosz Mruk; Jerzy Walecki
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-04-12

Review 9.  Consensus statements on the management of clinically localized prostate cancer from the Hong Kong Urological Association and the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology.

Authors:  Wai-Kit Ma; Darren Ming-Chun Poon; Chi-Kwok Chan; Tim-Wai Chan; Foon-Yiu Cheung; Lap-Yin Ho; Eric Ka-Chai Lee; Angus Kwong-Chuen Leung; Simon Yiu-Lam Leung; Hing-Shing So; Po-Chor Tam; Philip Wai-Kay Kwong
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  The Role of Immunohistochemical Analysis as a Tool for the Diagnosis, Prognostic Evaluation and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Arie Carneiro; Álan Roger Gomes Barbosa; Lucas Seiti Takemura; Paulo Priante Kayano; Natasha Kouvaleski Saviano Moran; Carolina Ko Chen; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Gustavo Caserta Lemos; Isabela Werneck da Cunha; Marcos Takeo Obara; Marcos Tobias-Machado; Adam G Sowalsky; Bianca Bianco
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.