Literature DB >> 28512726

Cutaneous reflex modulation during obstacle avoidance under conditions of normal and degraded visual input.

Daniel S Marigold1,2, Andrew J Chang3, Kim Lajoie3.   

Abstract

The nervous system integrates visual input regarding obstacles with limb-based sensory feedback to allow an individual to safely negotiate the environment. This latter source can include cutaneous information from the foot, particularly in the event that limb trajectory is not sufficient and there is an unintended collision with the object. However, it is not clear the extent to which cutaneous reflexes are modified based on visual input. In this study, we first determined if phase-dependent modulation of these reflexes is present when stepping over an obstacle during overground walking. We then tested the hypothesis that degrading the quality of visual feedback alters cutaneous reflex amplitude in this task. Subjects walked and stepped over an obstacle-leading with their right foot-while we electrically stimulated the right superficial peroneal nerve at the level of the ankle at different phases. Subjects performed this task with normal vision and with degraded vision. We found that the amplitude of cutaneous reflexes varied based on the phase of stepping over the obstacle in all leg muscles tested. With degraded visual feedback, regardless of phase, we found larger facilitation of cutaneous reflexes in the ipsilateral biceps femoris-a muscle responsible for flexing the knee to avoid the obstacle. Although degrading vision caused minor changes in several other muscles, none of these differences reached the level of significance. Nonetheless, our results suggest that visual feedback plays a role in altering how the nervous system uses other sensory input in a muscle-specific manner to ensure safe obstacle clearance.

Keywords:  Cutaneous afferents; Locomotion; Low vision; Obstacle avoidance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28512726     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4976-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  40 in total

1.  Contribution of vision and cutaneous sensation to the control of centre of mass (COM) during gait termination.

Authors:  S D Perry; L C Santos; A E Patla
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2001-09-14       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Cutaneous reflex modulation and self-induced reflex attenuation in cerebellar patients.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Frank Van Calenbergh; Stephan P Swinnen; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Motor cortical modulation of cutaneous reflex responses in the hindlimb of the intact cat.

Authors:  Frédéric Bretzner; Trevor Drew
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Postural uncertainty leads to dynamic control of cutaneous reflexes from the foot during human walking.

Authors:  Carlos Haridas; E Paul Zehr; John E Misiaszek
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-24       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Context-dependent modulation of interlimb cutaneous reflexes in arm muscles as a function of stability threat during walking.

Authors:  Carlos Haridas; E Paul Zehr; John E Misiaszek
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Taking the next step: cortical contributions to the control of locomotion.

Authors:  Trevor Drew; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  The contribution of vision, proprioception, and efference copy in storing a neural representation for guiding trail leg trajectory over an obstacle.

Authors:  Kim Lajoie; Leigh W Bloomfield; Fraser J Nelson; Jaewon J Suh; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?

Authors:  A E Patla; J N Vickers
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Kinematic analysis of step ascent among patients with central visual field loss.

Authors:  Matthew A Timmis; Amy C Scarfe; Daryl R Tabrett; Shahina Pardhan
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Effects of cataract type and location on visual function: the Blue Mountains Eye Study.

Authors:  B E Chua; P Mitchell; R G Cumming
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.