| Literature DB >> 28512575 |
Alice Brink1, John R Helliwell2.
Abstract
Multiple possibilities for the coordiical">nation ofEntities:
Keywords: fragment-based design; radiopharmaceutical agents; rhenium; technetium; two X-ray wavelengths
Year: 2017 PMID: 28512575 PMCID: PMC5414402 DOI: 10.1107/S2052252517003475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: IUCrJ ISSN: 2052-2525 Impact factor: 4.769
X-ray crystallographic data and final protein model refinement statistics for Diamond Light Source (DLS) data (refined in tetragonal and orthorhombic space groups) and Cu Kα data (orthorhombic)
Overall diffraction resolution values are given, with values for the outer diffraction resolution shell in parentheses.
| DLS (λ = 0.9763 Å) (tetragonal; PDB code | DLS (λ = 0.9763 Å) (orthorhombic) | Cu | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data reduction | |||
| Space group |
|
|
|
| Unit-cell parameters |
|
|
|
| Molecular mass (Da) | 14700 | 14700 | 14700 |
| Molecules per asymmetric unit | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Detector | Dectris PILATUS 6M-F | Dectris PILATUS 6M-F | Bruker APEX II |
| Crystal-to-detector distance (mm) | 135 | 135 | 40 |
| X-ray wavelength (Å) | 0.97625 | 0.97625 | 1.5418 |
| Observed reflections | 735148 (31186) | 735464 (99591) | 647723 (22460) |
| Unique reflections | 32463 (1660) | 63838 (9126) | 22610 (3107) |
| Resolution (Å) | 39.95–1.27 | 56.47–1.26 | 39.86–1.79 |
| Completeness (%) | 99.9 (98.3) | 99.9 (99.5) | 99.4 (96.4) |
|
| 0.077 (2.066) | 0.077 (1.453) | 0.142 (0.750) |
| 〈 | 20.9 (1.7) | 14.7 (1.6) | 17.52 (1.92) |
| Multiplicity | 22.6 (18.8) | 11.5 (10.9) | 28.48 (10.9) |
| Mn( | 0.999 (0.556) | 0.998 (0.536) |
|
| Cruickshank DPI (Å) | 0.049 | 0.050 |
|
| Average | 21.0 | 22.8 | 20.45 |
| Refinement | |||
|
| 17.22/19.6 | 17.9/22.6 | 19.4/26.6 |
|
| 17.22 | 18.2 | 16.6 |
| R.m.s.d., angles (°) | 1.145 | 2.793 | 1.122 |
| Ramachandran values (%) | |||
| Most favoured | 98.4 | 96.6 | 98.8 |
| Additional allowed | 1.56 | 3.44 | 1.16 |
| Disallowed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The raw diffraction images are available at Zenodo (Brink & Helliwell, 2017 ▸).
Note that the order of the a, b, c unit-cell parameter values in Table 1 ▸ follows the respective conventions of the two different diffraction data-processing programs that we have used.
The CC1/2 metric is more recently introduced than the Bruker software used with the APEX II instrument, which therefore does not include it. The other, much used, metric of 〈I/σ(I)〉 crossing 2 is provided.
In the case of anisotropic protein model refinement undertaken at a diffraction resolution worse than ∼1.6 Å the calculated DPI formula denominator value of [number of observations (21313) − number of refined parameters (20690)] is approaching zero and the DPI estimate thus becomes unstable. Therefore, the distance values from our Cu Kα data cannot have reliably reported e.s.d. values. Details regarding the ‘DPI webserver’ can be found in Kumar et al. (2015 ▸). We prefer to use an anisotropic refinement for the Cu Kα case as it improved the F o − F o residual density, in particular around the Re atoms and their coordinated ligands.
Figure 1Composite OMIT maps of the binding site at His15 in chains A (a) and B (b) coordinating to fac-[Re(CO)3(H2O)2N] (the N atom is from His15). The 2F o − F c electron-density map contoured at 1.2 r.m.s. is shown in blue and the F o − F c electron-density map contoured at 5.0σ (the Coot default; Emsley & Cowtan, 2004 ▸) is shown in green; the anomalous electron-density map contoured at 3.0σ is shown in orange. This figure was prepared using CCP4mg (McNicholas et al., 2011 ▸).
Figure 2Composite OMIT maps of the Asp119A binding site coordinating to fac-[Re(CO)3(H2O)2]. This figure clearly shows the close proximity of the Arg125 residue to the rhenium core. The electron-density maps are contoured as in Fig. 1 ▸. F o − F c density is indicated for the axial CO and H2O ligands, which are refined according to the monomer cif library. However, no electron density is apparent for the trans coordinating CO ligand. The CO has therefore been refined with zero occupancy but must be chemically present, in accordance with the current chemical understanding of fac-[M(CO)3]+ complexes as previously stated. The quasi bite angle (QBA) at Asp119A is 41 (2)° for OD2—Re3H⋯OD1. The distances to the Re atom are 2.5 (1) and 3.26 (9) Å, respectively. The coordination environment at Asp119B is similar, with bond distances as listed in Supplementary Table S4. This figure was prepared using CCP4mg (McNicholas et al., 2011 ▸).
Figure 3Composite OMIT maps of the Asp52A and Glu35A binding sites coordinating to fac-[Re(CO)3(H2O)2]+, indicating the close proximity of the two Re atoms to each other. The relative positions of the Re atoms are clearly defined by the anomalous map to σ levels of 14.3 and 14.8. Clashes occur between the carbonyl and aqua ligands of the two Re atoms. The respective orientation of the fac-[Re(CO)3]+ moieties has been placed as well as possible, taking into account the limited 2F o − F c density. An F o − F c electron-density peak (6σ) is found in the vicinity, but its assignment is chemically uncertain and was therefore not made. The likely explanation for this layout, since their summed occupancies is less than 100%, is that a fraction of the unit cells in the crystals have a rhenium in one location and another fraction favours the nearby location. An alternative is that it is a dirhenium compound, for which there are several possibilities such as oxo-bridged, carbonyl bridged or metal–metal complexes. Electron-density maps are contoured as in Fig. 1 ▸. This figure was prepared using CCP4mg (McNicholas et al., 2011 ▸).
Figure 4Anomalous density accuracy in an overlay fit between the Cu Kα and DLS models. (a) The composite OMIT electron-density map for the Cu Kα laboratory data at Re6 and Re5, illustrating the relative positions of the Re atoms (as determined by the anomalous difference density map) and water solvent molecules (H2O34 and H2O17, as determined by the F o − F c and 2F o − F c electron-density maps). (b) Identical view as in (a) for the DLS data. An overlay fit between the Cu Kα and DLS models gave an r.m.s.d. of 0.14 Å for this subunit, i.e. closely identical in all respects. The fac-[Re(CO)3(H2O)2(X)] cif file (RRE) indicating the positions of the Re atoms in the DLS data as determined by the DLS X-ray wavelength optimized anomalous difference electron-density map. Notice the near-perfect overlay position of the respective Re atoms, i.e. Re6 and Re5 versus RRE6 and RRE7, as well as for H2O34 and H2O17 versus O2 for RRE6 and RRE7.
Figure 5Comparison of all possible small-molecule Re⋯Re interactions. (a) Mogul search plots of the number of small-molecule hits utilizing Re⋯Re interactions containing the fac-[Re(CO)3]+ fragment as a search criterion found in the CSD database. Colour bars indicate the number of structure hit entries with respect to bond length (Å) in the CSD version update 5.37 data library. The minimum/maximum bond distances had a standard deviation of 0.129 Å and a mean value of 3.065 Å. (b) Data analysis of all small-molecule hits {not necessarily containing the fac-[Re(CO)3]+ fragment as illustrated in (a)} for Re⋯Re interactions as a search criterion in the CSD database. The longest Re⋯Re distance [3.4934 (6) Å] is found in a cyclic pentakis(μ-hydrido)-icosacarbonyl-pentarhenium complex (CSD refcode PORYIE; Bergamo et al., 1998 ▸), whereas the shortest is for a carboxylate-dirhenium complex (CSD refcode GUVTUO; Golichenko & Shtemenko, 2015 ▸).