| Literature DB >> 28512455 |
Kalpana Arora1,2, Satyawati Sharma1, Suresh B N Krishna3, Jamila K Adam3, Ashwani Kumar4.
Abstract
The present study investigated the use of waste non-edible oil cakes (Jatropha, Karanja, Neem, and Mahua) as a substrate for the growth of Paecilomyces variotii and dipicolinic acid (DPA) production. Previous researches proved the efficacy of DPA in suppressing certain pathogens that are deleterious to the plants in the rhizosphere. DPA production was statistical optimized by amending non-edible oil cakes in growing media as nitrogen and sugars (Dextrose, Glucose, and Lactose) as carbon source. Plackett-Burman design (PBD), indicated that Jatropha cake, Karanja cake, and Dextrose were the most significant components (p < 0.05) of the media and were further optimized using response surface methodology (RSM). Jatropha cake, Karanja cake, and Dextrose at the concentration of 12.5, 4.5, and 10 g/l, respectively, yielded 250 mg/l of DPA, which was 2.5 fold more than that obtained from basal medium. HPLC analysis of the optimized medium (peak at retention time of 30 min) confirmed the enhanced DPA production by P. variotii. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed that optimized medium impose a stress like condition (due to less C:N ratio) for the fungus and generated more spores as compared to the basal medium in which carbon source is easily available for the mycelial growth. The antimicrobial activity of the fungal extract was tested and found to be effective even at 10-2 dilution after 72 h against two plant pathogens, Fusarium oxysporum and Verticillium dahlia. Statistical experimental design of this study and the use of non-edible oil cakes as a substrate offer an efficient and viable approach for DPA production by P. variotii.Entities:
Keywords: Paecilomyces variotii; biocontrol; dipicolinic Acid (DPA); jatropha cake; karanja cake; medium optimization
Year: 2017 PMID: 28512455 PMCID: PMC5411456 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Growth and bioactive substance (DPA) production by .
| C1 | Alone | 0.42 ± 0.01c | 6.7 × 109 | 0.29 ± 0.04d | 2.7 × 109 | 102 ± 3.5 |
| + PDA (1:1) | 0.35c | 9.0 × 109 | 0.15 ± 0.016a | 7.9 × 108 | 110 ± 1.2 | |
| + dextrose | 0.36d | 5.1 × 1010 | 0.31 ± 0.02d | 3.4 × 109 | 135 ± 2.3 | |
| C2 | Alone | 0.44d | 5.1 × 109 | 0.271 ± 0.02d | 2.0 × 109 | 70 ± 1.2 |
| + PDA (1:1) | 0.32 ± 0.02d | 6.2 × 109 | 0.135 ± 0.005a | 3.1 × 108 | 78 ± 3.5 | |
| + dextrose | 0.23 ± 0.01c | 2.9 × 1010 | 0.28 ± 0.04d | 1.9 × 109 | 83 ± 1.3 | |
| C3 | Alone | 0.25 ± 0.02d | 4.5 × 109 | 0.275 ± 0.02d | 2.1 × 109 | 108 ± 2.1 |
| + PDA (1:1) | 0.31 ± 0.02d | 1.0 × 109 | 0.13 ± 0.01a | 3.0 × 108 | 116 ± 1.1 | |
| + dextrose) | 0.35 ± 0.01d | 2.1 × 1010 | 0.28 ± 0.04d | 1.8 × 109 | 136 ± 2.5 | |
| C4 | Alone | 0.18 ± 0.015b | 7.1 × 108 | 0.20 ± 0.03b | 10 × 107 | 60 ± 3.4 |
| + PDA (1:1) | 0.18 ± 0.01c | 8.3 × 107 | 0.12 ± 0.04a | 8.7 × 107 | 52 ± 1.8 | |
| + dextrose) | 0.20c | 7.7 × 107 | 0.18 ± 0.01b | 6.5 × 107 | 45 ± 3.4 | |
| Control | PDA (Potato Dextrose Agar) | 0.26 ± 0.01c | 2.5 × 109 | 0.249 ± 0.01c | 1.5 × 109 | 91 ± 1.0 |
C1, Jatropha oil cake; C2, Neem oil cake; C3, Karanja oil cake; C4, Mahua oil cake. Same letter used in each column indicates insignificant difference among the treatments (p < 0.05) according to DMRT. Value are means of n = 4.
Levels of various Carbon and Nitrogen sources tested in Plackett-Burman Design (PBD).
| x1 | Glucose | 15 | 60 |
| x2 | Dextrose | 15 | 60 |
| x3 | Lactose | 15 | 60 |
| x4 | Karanja | 10 | 40 |
| x5 | Jatropha | 12 | 48 |
| x6 | Neem | 12 | 48 |
| x7 | Mahua | 17 | 56 |
PBD and results of the fractional factorial design.
| 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 89.4 | 88.2 |
| 2 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 90.1 | 94.3 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 79.7 | 78.2 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 89.6 | 90.2 |
| 5 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 90.9 | 91.2 |
| 6 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 88.6 | 88.6 |
| 7 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 96.2 | 94.6 |
| 8 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 93.1 | 94.2 |
| 9 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 140.1 | 138 |
| 10 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 96.2 | 98.4 |
| 11 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 99.4 | 100.6 |
| 12 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 104 | 105.4 |
| 13 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 96.8 | 96.8 |
| 14 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 152 | 155 |
| 15 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 94 | 91.2 |
| 16 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 95.2 | 94.2 |
| 17 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 97.3 | 98.8 |
| 18 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 130.2 | 132 |
| 19 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 93.3 | 94.4 |
| 20 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 91 | 89.8 |
| 21 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 98.2 | 97.8 |
| 22 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 99.7 | 100.4 |
| 23 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 93 | 92.2 |
| 24 | −1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 93 | 92.3 |
| 25 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 99.6 |
| 26 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 68.7 | 70.3 |
| 27 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 88.3 | 88.6 |
| 28 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 92.4 | 93.2 |
| 29 | 1 | −1 | −1 | −1 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 92 | 91.2 |
| 30 | 1 | −1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | −1 | 92.4 | 93.6 |
Coded and real values for Box Behnken design (concentration g/l).
| Dextrose | 5 | 10 | 15 |
| Jatropha | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Karanja | 2 | 4 | 8 |
Response from Box Behnken design experiment (conc. g/l).
| 1 | −1.000 | 0.000 | −1.000 | 172.5 |
| 2 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 251.2 |
| 3 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 249.8 |
| 4 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 107 |
| 5 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 250.4 |
| 6 | −1.000 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 138 |
| 7 | −1.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 155 |
| 8 | 0.000 | −1.000 | 1.000 | 130 |
| 9 | 1.000 | 0.000 | −1.000 | 99.2 |
| 10 | 0.000 | −1.000 | −1.000 | 140 |
| 11 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | 115 |
| 12 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 248.2 |
| 13 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 253 |
| 14 | −1.000 | −1.000 | 0.000 | 140 |
| 15 | 0.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 128 |
| 16 | 0.000 | 1.000 | −1.000 | 175 |
| 17 | 1.000 | −1.000 | 0.000 | 115 |
Significance of quadratic model coefficients for DPA production.
| Intercept | 341.2 | 115.35 | <0.0001 |
| x1 | 47.0 | 69.50 | <0.0001 |
| x2 | 119.6 | 5.59 | 0.0501 |
| x3 | 225.5 | 16.99 | 0.0045 |
| −2.66 | 1.09 | 0.3309 | |
| −13.1 | 8.68 | 0.0215 | |
| −97.1 | 6.64 | 0.0367 | |
| x1x2 | 0.37 | 363.08 | <0.0001 |
| x1x3 | 2.83 | 225.96 | <0.0001 |
| x2x3 | −6.16 | 244.14 | <0.0001 |
ANOVA for response surface quadratic model obtained for DPA production.
| Model | 53514.61 | 5946.07 | 9 | 115.35 | <0.0001 |
| Residual | 360.85 | 51.55 | 10 | ||
| Lack of Fit | 295.32 | 49.22 | 6 | 3.004 | 0.22 |
| Pure Error | 16.382 | 4 | |||
| Total | 53875.46 | 19 |
CV % = 4.26; R.
Value of “p >F” less than 0.05 indicate model terms are significant.
The CV value >4 indicates adequate precision in the model.
Figure 12D contour plot and 3D response surface curve of Jatropha oil cake and Dextrose predicted by the full quadratic model.
Figure 22D contour plot and 3D response surface curve of Karanja and Dextrose predicted by the full quadratic model.
Figure 32D contour plot and 3D response surface curve of Karanja and Jatropha predicted by the full quadratic model.
Figure 4Scanning Electron Micrographs of Spores in normal PDB are less in number, spherical, and with smooth surface. (B) Spores in optimized non-edible oil cake medium are numerous, oval shaped, and ornamented surface.
Figure 5Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) analysis of and V. dahilae (B).
Figure 6High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) for DPA production of control and best NEOCs (Karanja oil cake + Jatropha oil cake + Dextrose) treatment (at Retention Time 30 min).