| Literature DB >> 28511634 |
Chantal Trudel1,2, Sue Cobb1, Kathryn Momtahan3, Janet Brintnell4, Ann Mitchell4.
Abstract
Qualitative data collection methods drawn from the early stages of human-centred design frameworks combined with thematic analysis were used to develop an understanding of infection prevention practice within an existing neonatal intensive care unit. Findings were used to generate a framework of understanding which in turn helped inform a baseline approach for future research and design development. The study revealed that a lack of clarity between infection transmission zones and a lack of design attributes needed to uphold infection prevention measures may be undermining healthcare workers' understanding and application of good practice. The issue may be further complicated by well-intentioned behavioural attitudes to meeting work objectives; undue influences from spatial constraints; the influence of inadvertent and excessive touch-based interactions; physical and/or cognitive exertion to maintain transmission barriers; and the impact of expanding job design and increased workload to supplement for lack of effective barriers. Practitioner Summary: Despite high hand hygiene compliance within a neonatal intensive care unit, healthcare workers expressed concerns about the unit design and infection prevention practice. Early inquiry methods from human-centred design and thematic analysis helped develop a framework to understand how design can be used to aid infection prevention.Entities:
Keywords: Infection prevention and control; design; ergonomics; human factors; neonatal intensive care unit
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28511634 DOI: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1330967
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ergonomics ISSN: 0014-0139 Impact factor: 2.778