| Literature DB >> 28511056 |
Daniel Gold1, Mohammed Alian2, Avraham Domb2, Yara Karawani3, Maysa Jbarien3, Jacques Chollet4, Richard K Haynes5, Ho Ning Wong5, Viola Buchholz6, Andreas Greiner6, Jacob Golenser7.
Abstract
The current treatment of schistosomiasis is based on the anti-helminthic drug praziquantel (PZQ). PZQ affects only the adult stages of schistosomes. In addition, resistance to PZQ is emerging. We suggest a drug, which could serve as a potential alternative or complement to PZQ, and as a means of treating infections at earlier, pre-granuloma stage. Derivatives of the peroxidic antimalarial drug artemisinin have been indicated as alternatives, because both plasmodia and schistosomes are blood-feeding parasites. The mechanism of action of artemisinins is related to oxidative effects of the artemisinins on intracellular reductants leading to formation of cytotoxic reactive oxygen species. We used artemisone, which has improved pharmacokinetics and anti-plasmodial activity, and reduced toxicity compared to other artemisinins in clinical use against malaria. We infected adult mice by subcutaneous injection of S. mansoni cercariae (about 200) and treated them at various times post infection by the following methods: i. artemisone suspension administered by gavage (400-450 mg/kg); ii. subcutaneous injection of a gel containing a known concentration of artemisone (115-120 mg/kg); iii. subcutaneous insertion of the drug incorporated in a solid polymer (56-60 mg/kg); iv. intraperitoneal injection of the drug solubilized in DMSO (115-120 mg/kg). Drug administration in polymers was performed to enable slow release of the artemisone that was verified in vivo and in vitro bioassays using drug-sensitive malaria parasites. We found superior strong anti-schistosome effects up to a total reduction of worm number, mainly following repetitive treatments with the drug absorbed in the polymers (73.1% and 95.9% reduction in mice treated with artemisone in gel 7 and 14, and 21, 28 and 35 days post infection, respectively). The results indicate that artemisone has a potent anti-schistosome activity. Its main importance in this context is its effectiveness in treating hosts harboring juvenile schistosomes, before egg-deposition and induction of deleterious immune responses.Entities:
Keywords: Artemisone; Schistosoma; Slow release; Treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28511056 PMCID: PMC5430492 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2017.05.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist ISSN: 2211-3207 Impact factor: 4.077
Recovered worms and their percent reduction in mice treated by artemisinin derivatives.
| Compound | Structure | Recovered worms | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Male | Female | ||
| Control | – | 44.0 | 23.9 | 20.1 |
| Artemiside | 4.6 | 2.6 | 2.0 | |
| Artemisone | 3.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | |
| CKW03 | 9.2 | 5.4 | 3.8 | |
| Artemether | 5.4 | 3.2 | 2.2 | |
Infected mice were treated at day 21 post infection (PI) by gavage. The mice were dissected at day 49 PI and schistosomes counted. n = 5 in experimental groups and 10 in the control group. P < 0.01 in all experimental groups.
Fig. 1The effect of artemisone administered by gavage on S. mansoni infections. Infected mice were treated by gavage at days 18 and 25 (A), and at day 21, 29 and 35 (B) post infection (PI). Each point represents one mouse. Mice were dissected at day 49 PI and schistosomes counted. n = 5 in the control groups and 6 in the experimental groups. Difference was significant between the control group and the two artemisone treated groups group (<0.01) but was more pronounced in mice that were treated thrice compared to those that were treated twice (97.1 % vs. 70.4% reduction, respectively).
Fig. 2The effect of artemisone administered by late gavage treatment. Infected mice treated by gavage once on day 42, or twice on day 42 and 49 post infection (PI) were dissected on day 61 PI and schistosomes counted. n = 4 or 5 (each point represents one mouse). Difference was significant only between the control group and the group that was treated twice (68.5% reduction, p < 0.05).
Fig. 3The effect of artemisone administered in solid polymers. Infected mice were treated by artemisone in solid polymers 20 days PI. Each point represents one mouse. n = 5 in all groups. Mice were dissected at day 49 PI and schistosomes counted. Schistosome number in the treated group was reduced by 79.4% (p < 0.01).
Recovered worms and percent reduction in mice treated by artemisone and praziquantel administered in gel
| Day of | Artemisone in | Control | Experimental | Percent inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7, 14 | 4 mg | 18.6 | 5.0 | 73.1* |
| 21, 28 | 4 mg | 40.2 | 8.5 | 81.6* |
| 21, 28, 35 | 4 mg | 39.5 | 1.6 | 95.9* |
| 21 | 4 mg | 40.2 | 24.2 | 39.8 |
| 34 | 4 mg | 61.4 | 11.0 | 82.1* |
| 42, 49 | 4 mg | 30.2 | 2.3 | 92.4* |
| Praziquantel in | ||||
| 7, 14 | 4 mg | 30.2 | 25.0 | 17.3 |
| 42, 49 | 4 mg | 30.2 | 0.2 | 99.3* |
Infected mice were treated at various days PI. Mice were dissected on day 49–51 PI and schistosomes counted. n = 5 in all groups. *Significant vs. control (p < 0.01).
Artemisone is significant vs. praziquantel.
Percent inhibition of Plasmodium falciparum development by artemisone released in vitro from gels.
| Day of gel | Supernatant dilution | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1/3125 | 1/15,625 | 1/78,125 | |
| 3 | 95% | 68% | 17% |
| 7 | 94% | 14% | 11% |
Considerable amounts of active artemisone were released in vitro, spanning at least 7 days. For example, a final dilution of 1/15,625 of supernatant collected on day 3 inhibited 68% of parasite development (meaning that the amount of artemisone that was released in days 3 and 5 was about 16 and 5 μg, respectively).
The ED50 of free artemisone was estimated by identical methods and was about one ng/ml.
Significant in comparison with supernatants of blank gels.
Fig. 4Artemisone bioassay in mice infected by P. berghei ANKA (PbA). Mice were treated by artemisone in gel, 2mg/0.2ml/mouse (∼80 mg/kg), 3 days before infection with PbA. Each line represents one mouse. n = 3 in the experimental group and 5 in the control group. Difference was significant between the control and the experimental group (p < 0.01).