| Literature DB >> 28510959 |
John Derek Scasta1, David M Engle2, Ryan N Harr3, Diane M Debinski4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Symphoricarpos, a genus of the Caprifoliaceae family, consists of about 15 species of clonal deciduous shrubs in North America and 1 species endemic to China. In North American tallgrass prairie, Symphoricarpos orbiculatus (buckbrush) is the dominant shrub often forming large colonies via sexual and asexual reproductive mechanisms. Symphoricarpos shrubs, in particular S. orbiculatus, use a unique sexual reproductive mechanism known as layering where vertical stems droop and the tips root upon contact with the soil. Because of conflicting societal values of S. orbiculatus for conservation and agriculture and the current attempt to restore historical fire regimes, there is a need for basic research on the biological response of S. orbiculatus to anthropogenic burning regimes.Entities:
Keywords: Disturbance; Ecology; Prairie; Rangeland; Resprout; Restoration; Woody plant
Year: 2014 PMID: 28510959 PMCID: PMC5432769 DOI: 10.1186/s40529-014-0080-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bot Stud ISSN: 1817-406X Impact factor: 2.787
Schedule of prescribed fire and measurements of in the Grand River Grasslands, USA, 2007-2013
| Year | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 |
|
| |||||||
|
| |||||||
| Patch A | fire | - | - | fire | -, m1, m2 | -, m1 | fire, m1, m2 |
| Patch B | - | fire | - | - | fire, m1, m2 | -, m1 | -, m1, m2 |
| Patch C | - | - | fire | - | -, m1, m2 | fire, m1 | -, m1, m2 |
|
| |||||||
| Patch A | fire | - | fire* | fire | -, m1, m2 | -, m1 | fire, m1, m2 |
| Patch B | - | fire | fire* | - | fire, m1, m2 | -, m1 | -, m1, m2 |
| Patch C | - | - | fire | - | -, m1, m2 | fire, m1 | -, m1, m2 |
|
| |||||||
| Patch A | fire | - | - | fire | -, m1, m2 | -, m1 | fire, m1, m2 |
| Patch B | - | fire | - | - | fire, m1, m2 | -, m1 | -, m1, m2 |
| Patch C | - | - | fire | - | -, m1, m2 | fire, m1 | -, m1, m2 |
|
| |||||||
| | - | - | fire | - | -, m1 | fire, m1 | -, m1 |
| | - | - | fire | - | -, m1 | fire, m1 | -, m1 |
| | - | - | fire | - | -, m1 | fire, m1 | -, m1 |
|
| |||||||
| | - | - | - | - | -, m1, m2 | - | -, d |
| | - | - | - | - | -, m1, m2 | - | -, d |
| | - | - | - | - | -, m1, m2 | - | -, d |
Fire: − = no fire; fire = prescribed fire; fire* = escaped out of the intended burn patch and burned remainder of pasture; d = disrupted (we had less control over the unburned treatment and when we returned in 2013 to measure a second assessment of unburned pastures, they had all either been burned or mowed). (d = disrupted).
Measurements: m = Symphoricarpos orbiculatus maximum ramet height, ramet maximum canopy diameter, stems per ramet measured as number of vertical live stems arising from the same root crown; m = new aerial layering stems.
Treatments: Patch-burn grazing (PBG) where one-third of a pasture (the patch) is burned and cattle have full access to the pasture, Graze and burn (GAB) where the entire pasture is burned every third year (2012 was the burn year) and cattle have full access to the pasture, and Not burned for more than three years with no grazing. Treatments were in place starting in 2007 so all patches and pastures had a consistent elapsed time since fire (0.3, 1, 2 years since fire).
Figure 1Diagram of fire effects measurements given the clonal nature of . We conducted measurements at the ramet level and define ramets as individual plants or clonal fragments in the colony that are rooted and may or may not be connected to other ramets by rhizomes or rooted aerial layering stems. Individual ramets were identified by spatial independence based on vertical stems arising from the same root crown. New aerial layering stems were measured as vertical stems arising from the root crown, having a horizontal orientation, and not yet rooting at the tip.
Figure 2Mean ± SE of ramet height (A), ramet canopy diameter (B), stems per ramet (C), and ramets per 100 m(D) for plants exposed to three fire treatments in the Grand River Grasslands of Iowa, USA, 2011–2013. Treatments are 1) Patch-burn grazing (PBG) where one-third of a pasture (the patch) is burned and cattle have full access to the pasture, 2) Graze and burn (GAB) where the entire pasture is burned every third year (2012 was the burn year) and cattle have full access to the pasture, 3) Unburned for greater than three years with no grazing. The asterisk indicates if the unburned treatment is significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) than the burned treatments and all elapsed time since fire categories (0.3, 1 or 2 years after fire). Letters indicate significant differences within a treatment (P ≤ 0.05) (lower case for PBG and capitalized for GAB) based on a mixed effects model.
Maximum likelihood estimates for time since fire and probability of new layering stems
| Parameter | Estimate | Standard | Likelihood ratio 95% | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error | Confidence limits | ||||
| Intercept | 3.420 | 1.077 | 1.537 | 5.858 | 0.002 |
| Time Since Fire | −1.330 | 0.403 | −2.235 | −0.622 | 0.001 |
Maximum likelihood parameter estimates for time since fire and probability of the presence of new aerial layering stems based on the logit function and binomial presence/absence data. Based on the exponentiation of the parameter estimate, the odds of having a layering stem present improve 3.77x for every year closer to the burn year.
Figure 3Effect of elapsed time since fire on new horizontal layering stems based on percent of plots with new layering stems (A), and new layering stem density (B) in the unburned pastures and the Patch-burn grazed (PBG) pastures in in the Grand River Grasslands of Iowa, USA, 2011 and 2013. Letters indicate differences (P ≤ 0.05) based on a mixed effects model.