Carolien M Wind1, Esther de Vries1, Maarten F Schim van der Loeff2,3, Martijn S van Rooijen1, Alje P van Dam4,5, Walter H B Demczuk6, Irene Martin6, Henry J C de Vries1,7,8. 1. STI Outpatient Clinic, Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 2. Department of Infectious Diseases Research and Prevention, Public Health Service (GGD) of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 3. Department of General Medicine, Public Health Service Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 4. Public Health Laboratory, Department of Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service Amsterdam. 5. Department of Medical Microbiology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis General Hospital. 6. National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg. 7. Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 8. Center for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
Background: Increasing azithromycin usage and resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae threatens current dual treatment. Because antimicrobial exposure influences resistance, we analyzed the association between azithromycin exposure and decreased susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae. Methods: We included N. gonorrhoeae isolates of patients who visited the Amsterdam STI Clinic between 1999 and 2013 (t0), with another clinic visit in the previous 60 days (t-1). Exposure was defined as the prescription of azithromycin at t-1. Using multivariable linear regression, we assessed the association between exposure and azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to produce a phylogeny and identify multilocus sequence types (MLST), N. gonorrhoeae multiantigen sequence types (NG-MAST), and molecular markers of azithromycin resistance. Results: We included 323 isolates; 212 were unexposed to azithromycin, 14 were exposed ≤30 days, and 97 were exposed between 31 and 60 days before isolation. Mean azithromycin MIC was 0.28 mg/L (range, <0.016-24 mg/L). Linear regression adjusted for age, ethnicity, infection site, and calendar year showed a significant association between azithromycin exposure ≤30 days and MIC (β, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.56; P = .002). WGS was performed on 31 isolates: 14 unexposed, 14 exposed to azithromycin ≤30 days before isolation, and 3 t-1 isolates. Exposure to azithromycin was significantly associated with A39T or G45D mtrR mutations (P = .046) but not with MLST or NG-MAST types. Conclusions: The results suggest that frequent azithromycin use in populations at high risk of contracting N. gonorrhoeae induces an increase in MIC and may result in resistance.
Background: Increasing azithromycin usage and resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae threatens current dual treatment. Because antimicrobial exposure influences resistance, we analyzed the association between azithromycin exposure and decreased susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeae. Methods: We included N. gonorrhoeae isolates of patients who visited the Amsterdam STI Clinic between 1999 and 2013 (t0), with another clinic visit in the previous 60 days (t-1). Exposure was defined as the prescription of azithromycin at t-1. Using multivariable linear regression, we assessed the association between exposure and azithromycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to produce a phylogeny and identify multilocus sequence types (MLST), N. gonorrhoeae multiantigen sequence types (NG-MAST), and molecular markers of azithromycin resistance. Results: We included 323 isolates; 212 were unexposed to azithromycin, 14 were exposed ≤30 days, and 97 were exposed between 31 and 60 days before isolation. Mean azithromycin MIC was 0.28 mg/L (range, <0.016-24 mg/L). Linear regression adjusted for age, ethnicity, infection site, and calendar year showed a significant association between azithromycin exposure ≤30 days and MIC (β, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.56; P = .002). WGS was performed on 31 isolates: 14 unexposed, 14 exposed to azithromycin ≤30 days before isolation, and 3 t-1 isolates. Exposure to azithromycin was significantly associated with A39T or G45D mtrR mutations (P = .046) but not with MLST or NG-MAST types. Conclusions: The results suggest that frequent azithromycin use in populations at high risk of contracting N. gonorrhoeae induces an increase in MIC and may result in resistance.
Authors: L Ryan; D Golparian; N Fennelly; L Rose; P Walsh; B Lawlor; M Mac Aogáin; M Unemo; B Crowley Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2018-06-07 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Walter Demczuk; Irene Martin; Pam Sawatzky; Vanessa Allen; Brigitte Lefebvre; Linda Hoang; Prenilla Naidu; Jessica Minion; Paul VanCaeseele; David Haldane; David W Eyre; Michael R Mulvey Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Scott W Olesen; Elizabeth A Torrone; John R Papp; Robert D Kirkcaldy; Marc Lipsitch; Yonatan H Grad Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Lindley A Barbee; Olusegun O Soge; David A Katz; Julia C Dombrowski; King K Holmes; Matthew R Golden Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-02-10 Impact factor: 9.079