Literature DB >> 28510285

Influence of quality of recovery on patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery: a prospective observational cohort study.

V Berning1, M Laupheimer2, M Nübling3, T Heidegger1,4.   

Abstract

Patient satisfaction and quality of recovery are important measures of quality. Whether, and to what extent, patient satisfaction is influenced by quality of recovery, however, is not clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the additional influence of quality of recovery on total patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery. In this prospective cohort study, we used a validated quality of recovery questionnaire and a multi-item patient satisfaction questionnaire. Patients completed the quality of recovery questionnaire pre-operatively and 24 h postoperatively. One to two weeks after discharge, a third quality of recovery questionnaire was sent out, together with the patient satisfaction questionnaire. If no response was received after 2 weeks, a reminder containing the quality of recovery and the satisfaction questionnaire were mailed. Seven hundred and thirty-four patients were consecutively assessed for eligibility. Five hundred and seventy-nine patients completed at least one questionnaire (recruitment rate 79%). Four hundred and sixty-seven patients (81%) completed all four questionnaires. The total satisfaction score was high, with a mean (SD) of 94.6 (10.7) on a 0-100 scale. Correlation analysis between quality of recovery and total patient satisfaction showed correlations of 0.2-0.3. Testing different aspects of quality of recovery in models already containing the significant factors of patient satisfaction did not improve the model fit markedly. We conclude that quality of recovery has only a marginal additional effect on total patient satisfaction with anaesthesia and surgery.
© 2017 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Quality measures: patient care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28510285     DOI: 10.1111/anae.13906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesia        ISSN: 0003-2409            Impact factor:   6.955


  9 in total

Review 1.  The role of local anaesthetic techniques in ERAS protocols for thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Seamus Crumley; Stefan Schraag
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Patient satisfaction with divided anesthesia care.

Authors:  Kira-Lee Koster; Carolin Björklund; Sebastian Fenner; Wolfgang Johann Flierler; Michael Laupheimer; Katharina Burri; Matthias Nübling; Thomas Heidegger
Journal:  Anaesthesiologie       Date:  2022-08-29

3.  Comparing propofol anaesthesia guided by Bispectral Index monitoring and frontal EEG wave analysis with standard monitoring in laparoscopic surgery: protocol for the 'EEG in General Anaesthesia - More Than Only a Bispectral Index' Trial, a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Bettina U Gruber; Valerie Girsberger; Lukas Kusstatscher; Simon Funk; Anita Luethy; Lien Jakus; Julien Maillard; Luzius A Steiner; Salome Dell-Kuster; Christoph S Burkhart
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Propofol vs. inhalational agents to maintain general anaesthesia in ambulatory and in-patient surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Schraag; Lorenzo Pradelli; Abdul Jabbar Omar Alsaleh; Marco Bellone; Gianni Ghetti; Tje Lin Chung; Martin Westphal; Sebastian Rehberg
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 5.  Systematic Review of Breast-Q: A Tool to Evaluate Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Ishith Seth; Nimish Seth; Gabriella Bulloch; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2021-12-16

6.  Efficacy of High-Quality Nursing Service for the Patients during the Anesthesia Recovery Period: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hui Li; Heng Wang; Yan Pan; Qian Huang; Xueping Li; Xiaoqi Zeng; Li Zhou
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 1.664

7.  Relationship between inpatient satisfaction and the quality of surgery.

Authors:  Rongyu Shang; Duan Wang; Huifen Cai; Jiafei Chen; Lin Lv; Chunji Huang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-05

8.  Factors Associated with Poor Satisfaction with Anesthesia in Patients Who Had Previous Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Junko Nakahira; Toshiyuki Sawai; Junichi Ishio; Shoko Nakano; Toshiaki Minami
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2019-10-30

9.  The combinatorial use of propofol-fentanyl-ketamine for sedoanalgesia in patients undergoing urological procedures.

Authors:  Abdelkarim S Aloweidi; Sami A Abu-Halaweh; Ghazi M Al-Edwan; Saddam H Al Demour; Laith T Abu Mahfuz; Osama N Noubani; Mohammad M Al Rwaidi; Isam K Bsisu; Mohammad M Abufaraj
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.422

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.