| Literature DB >> 28510185 |
Lin-Jiao Wang1,2, Mao-Yin Sheng3,4,5, Pei-Cai Wen1,6, Jia-Ying Du2,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tartary buckwheat are very popular as an important functional food material and its cultivation is very widespread in our whole world, but there obviously lack works in the researches of genetic breeding for agricultural and medicinal utilization. The aim of this study is to obtain good germplasm resources for agricultural and medicinal use of tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) by inducing the tetraploid plants.Entities:
Keywords: Chromosome counting; Colchicine; Fagopyrum tataricum; Morphological characteristics; Tetraploid
Year: 2017 PMID: 28510185 PMCID: PMC5432912 DOI: 10.1186/s40529-016-0157-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bot Stud ISSN: 1817-406X Impact factor: 2.787
Effects of colchicines (0.25%) treated duration on death rate, and tetraploid induction efficiency in treated cultivars of Fagopyrum tataricum
| Cultivar | Duration of treatment (h) | Number of seedlings | Death rate (%) | Tetraploid induction efficiency (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qianwei 2# | 48 | 50 | 2.00 | 29.15 D |
| 72 | 50 | 6.00 | 53.23 A | |
| 96 | 50 | 10.00 | 41.45 BC | |
| Jinku 2# | 48 | 50 | 2.00 | 12.13 E |
| 72 | 50 | 4.00 | 31.24 D | |
| 96 | 50 | 6.00 | 19.35 E | |
| Chuanqiao 1# | 48 | 50 | 4.00 | 50.34 B |
| 72 | 50 | 6.00 | 54.55 A | |
| 96 | 50 | 8.00 | 48.56 B | |
| Liuqiao 1# | 48 | 50 | 4.00 | 18.34 E |
| 72 | 50 | 8.00 | 30.45 D | |
| 96 | 50 | 10.00 | 20.04 E |
Death rate was recorded after 2 weeks of colchicines treatment
Different capital letters indicate significance of the difference between two mean values at the p = 0.01 level, as tested by Duncan’s test
Fig. 1Chromosomes of root tip cell of the diploid F. tataricum cultivars (a–d) and their corresponding induced tetraploids (e–h) (a/e Qianwei 2#; b/f Jinku 2#; c/g Chuanqiao 1#; d/h Liuqiao 1#). Bars 5 μm
Fig. 2Chromosome configuration of meiotic MI stage of the diploid and induced tetraploid F. tataricum (a 4x = 8IV, b 4x = 4IV + 8II, c and d 2x = 8II)
Fig. 3Abnormal cell division of PMC at meiotic TII stage of the induced tetraploid F. tataricum plants (a Tetrads with micronucleus; b tetrad with multiple nucleoli; c Pentad with multiple nucleoli; d triad with multiple nucleoli; e pentads; f hexads). Arrows show multiple nucleoli
Comparisons of meiotic TII stage between the induced tetraploids and their corresponding diploid F. tataricum cultivars
| Cultivar | Tetraploid | Diploid |
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sum of cell | Abnormal cell frequency (%) | Micronucleus to cell ratio | Sum of cell | Abnormal cell frequency (%) | Micronucleus to cell ratio | |||
| Qianwei 2# | 132 | 30.30 | 0.5000 | 112 | 5.36 | 0.0536 | 4.9645** | 7.6190** |
| Jinku 2# | 107 | 25.23 | 0.4486 | 107 | 4.67 | 0.0467 | 4.2171** | 6.8096** |
| Chuanqiao 1# | 140 | 18.57 | 0.3857 | 159 | 4.40 | 0.0440 | 3.9015** | 7.3160** |
| Liuqiao 1# | 194 | 28.87 | 0.4897 | 124 | 4.03 | 0.0403 | 5.4857** | 8.4178** |
| Average | 25.05 | 0.4494 | 4.45 | 0.0445 | ||||
t a Indicate the t value of abnormal cell frequency (%)
t b Indicate the t value of micronucleus to cell ratio
** Indicate significance of the difference at the p = 0.01 level
Comparisons of vegetative characteristics between the induced tetraploids and their corresponding diploid F. tataricum cultivars
| Vegetative characteristic (cm) | Qianwei 2# | Jinku 2# | Chuanqiao 1# | Liuqiao 1# | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| Plant height | 66.30 ± 20.20a | 55.03 ± 5.35a | 62.21 ± 15.34a | 56.00 ± 10.23a | 59.80 ± 21.02a | 61.67 ± 2.34a | 75.00 ± 23.12a | 69.90 ± 11.20a |
| Plant breadth | 40.23 ± 12.34a | 45.89 ± 9.21a | 39.36 ± 12.89a | 51.24 ± 18.21a | 45.34 ± 18.23a | 43.89 ± 8.90a | 53.34 ± 20.01a | 50.34 ± 15.78a |
| Diameter of basal stem | 1.03 ± 0.38a | 0.98 ± 0.31a | 1.11 ± 0.38a | 1.02 ± 0.30a | 0.99 ± 0.20a | 0.96 ± 0.13a | 1.20 ± 0.14a | 1.21 ± 0.33a |
| Leaf length | 6.12 ± 0.12A | 5.28 ± 0.28B | 6.39 ± 0.22A | 5.63 ± 0.26B | 6.56 ± 0.17A | 5.86 ± 0.15B | 7.23 ± 0.32A | 6.31 ± 0.18B |
| Leaf width | 4.02 ± 0.28A | 3.34 ± 0.17B | 4.21 ± 0.21A | 3.25 ± 0.13B | 3.99 ± 0.15A | 3.05 ± 0.11B | 5.32 ± 0.21A | 3.15 ± 0.15B |
| Leaf thickness | 0.95 ± 0.05A | 0.38 ± 0.13B | 0.83 ± 0.04A | 0.35 ± 0.11A | 0.88 ± 0.14A | 0.41 ± 0.10B | 0.92 ± 0.09A | 0.36 ± 0.16B |
| Leaf index (length/width) | 1.43 ± 0.22a | 1.21 ± 0.25b | 1.48 ± 0.31a | 1.11 ± 0.32b | 1.32 ± 0.18a | 1.39 ± 0.20a | 1.42 ± 0.23a | 1.35 ± 0.19a |
Different small-case/capital letters indicate the significance of difference between two mean values at the p = 0.05/0.01 level, respectively, as tested by two-sample t test, the same below
Comparisons of reproductive characteristics between the induced tetraploids and their corresponding diploid F. tataricum cultivars
| Reproductive characteristic | Qianwei 2# | Jinku 2# | Chuanqiao 1# | Liuqiao 1# | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| Vertical length of flower bud (mm) | 4.12 ± 0.16A | 3.23 ± 0.22B | 4.01 ± 0.24a | 3.36 ± 0.25b | 3.99 ± 0.20a | 3.37 ± 0.15b | 4.19 ± 0.23A | 3.30 ± 0.11B |
| Transverse diameter of flower bud (mm) | 2.35 ± 0.18A | 1.88 ± 0.21B | 2.22 ± 0.12A | 1.79 ± 0.20B | 2.31 ± 0.15a | 2.01 ± 0.11b | 2.68 ± 0.17A | 1.90 ± 0.23B |
| Flower diameter (mm) | 5.15 ± 0.26A | 3.68 ± 0.20B | 6.35 ± 0.32A | 3.24 ± 0.19B | 5.45 ± 0.25A | 3.56 ± 0.18B | 6.41 ± 0.20A | 3.29 ± 0.12B |
| Length of petal (mm) | 2.69 ± 0.11A | 1.63 ± 0.12B | 3.01 ± 0.18A | 1.51 ± 0.18B | 2.23 ± 0.13A | 1.25 ± 0.20B | 2.95 ± 0.09A | 1.17 ± 0.18B |
| Width of petal (mm) | 0.90 ± 0.03A | 0.52 ± 0.06B | 0.97 ± 0.09A | 0.49 ± 0.02B | 0.88 ± 0.07A | 0.40 ± 0.05B | 0.95 ± 0.03A | 0.38 ± 0.08B |
| Pollen grain diameter (μm) | 5.01 ± 0.34A | 3.91 ± 0.28B | 5.57 ± 0.34A | 3.82 ± 0.23B | 4.98 ± 0.31A | 3.88 ± 0.28B | 5.55 ± 0.27A | 3.89 ± 0.31B |
| Pollen-vigorous (%) | 20.35 ± 1.38B | 49.36 ± 3.21A | 18.89 ± 1.34B | 42.66 ± 2.89A | 19.67 ± 1.89B | 45.89 ± 2.92A | 17.89 ± 1.25B | 40.96 ± 3.01A |
| No. of inflorescences per plant | 42 ± 6a | 39 ± 8a | 37 ± 7a | 35 ± 8a | 43 ± 7a | 39 ± 5a | 38 ± 9a | 33 ± 5a |
| Average length of inflorescence (cm) | 8.91 ± 4.25a | 10.35 ± 4.36a | 7.89 ± 5.02a | 10.78 ± 5.21a | 7.34 ± 4.56a | 9.67 ± 3.89a | 6.99 ± 4.23a | 10.36 ± 5.01a |
| No. of flowers per inflorescence | 34 ± 21a | 67 ± 31a | 42 ± 20a | 73 ± 26a | 39 ± 25a | 71 ± 30a | 49 ± 22a | 77 ± 31a |
| Thousand-seed weight (g) | 24.41 ± 3.67A | 19.38 ± 2.25B | 22.66 ± 1.89A | 19.11 ± 1.12B | 31.59 ± 1.35A | 18.12 ± 0.98B | 26.84 ± 2.01A | 17.57 ± 1.03B |
| Seed size (mm) | 8.29 ± 0.84A | 5.86 ± 0.73B | 8.10 ± 0.35A | 6.01 ± 0.34B | 7.20 ± 0.17A | 5.63 ± 0.22B | 7.17 ± 0.24A | 5.42 ± 0.11B |
Different small-case/capital letters indicate the significance of difference between two mean values at the p = 0.05/0.01 level, respectively, as tested by two-sample t test, the same below
Fig. 4Leaves of the induced tetraploids and their corresponding diploid F. tataricum cultivars (a Qianwei 2#; b Jinku 2#; c Chuanqiao 1#; d Liuqiao 1#)
Fig. 5Flowers of the induced tetraploids and their corresponding diploid F. tataricum cultivars (a Qianwei 2#; b Jinku 2#; c Chuanqiao 1#; d Liuqiao 1#)
Fig. 6Pollen grains of the induced tetraploids and their corresponding diploid F. tataricum cultivars (a Qianwei 2#; b Jinku 2#; c Chuanqiao 1#; d Liuqiao 1#)
Fig. 7Seeds of the induced tetraploids and their corresponding diploid F. tataricum cultivars (a Qianwei 2#; b Jinku 2#; c Chuanqiao 1#; d Liuqiao 1#)
Comparisons of seed protein content and seed flavonoid content between induced tetraploids and their corresponding diploid F. tataricum cultivars
| Content | Qianwei 2# | Jinku 2# | Chuanqiao 1# | Liuqiao 1# | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | |
| Seed protein (%) | 16.4 ± 0.32A | 14.9 ± 0.45B | 19.4 ± 1.56A | 13.9 ± 1.14B | 15.7 ± 1.14A | 13.7 ± 1.03B | 18.5 ± 1.21A | 14.5 ± 0.96 B |
| Seed flavonoid (%) | 4.57 ± 0.25 A | 2.54 ± 0.18B | 3.84 ± 0.38A | 2.98 ± 0.27B | 3.23 ± 0.22A | 2.91 ± 0.16B | 3.96 ± 0.31A | 2.62 ± 0.11B |