Stephanie M N Glegg1,2, Liisa Holsti2, Sue Stanton2, Steven Hanna3, Diana Velikonja4, Barbara Ansley5, Denise Sartor5, Christine Brum5. 1. a Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children , Vancouver , BC , Canada. 2. b Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy , University of British Columbia , Vancouver , BC , Canada. 3. c Department of Clinical Epidemiology & Biostatistics, and Department of Rehabilitation Science , McMaster University , Hamilton , ON , Canada. 4. d Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, DeGroote School of Medicine , McMaster University , Hamilton , ON , Canada. 5. e Hamilton Health Sciences , Hamilton , ON , Canada.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of knowledge translation (KT) on factors influencing virtual reality (VR) adoption and to identify support needs of therapists. HYPOTHESES: Intervention will be associated with improvements in therapists' perceived ease of use and self-efficacy, and an associated increase in intentions to use VR. METHOD: Single group mixed-methods pre-test-post-test evaluation of convenience sample of physical, occupational and rehabilitation therapists (n=37) from two brain injury rehabilitation centres. ADOPT-VR administered pre/post KT intervention, consisting of interactive education, clinical manual, technical and clinical support. RESULTS: Increases in perceived ease of use (p=0.000) and self-efficacy (p=0.001), but not behavioural intention to use VR (p=0.158) were found following KT, along with decreases in the frequency of perceived barriers. Post-test changes in the frequency and nature of perceived facilitators and barriers were evident, with increased emphasis on peer influence, organisational-level supports and client factors. Additional support needs were related to clinical reasoning, treatment programme development, technology selection and troubleshooting. CONCLUSIONS: KT strategies hold potential for targeting therapists' perceptions of low self-efficacy and ease of use of this technology. Changes in perceived barriers, facilitators and support needs at post-test demonstrated support for repeated evaluation and multi-phased training initiatives to address therapists' needs over time. Implications for Rehabilitation Therapists' learning and support needs in integrating virtual reality extend beyond technical proficiency to include clinical decision-making and application competencies spanning the entire rehabilitation process. Phased, multi-faceted strategies may be valuable in addressing therapists' changing needs as they progress from novice to experienced virtual reality users. The ADOPT-VR is a sensitive measure to re-evaluate the personal, social, environmental, technology-specific and system-level factors influencing virtual reality adoption over time.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of knowledge translation (KT) on factors influencing virtual reality (VR) adoption and to identify support needs of therapists. HYPOTHESES: Intervention will be associated with improvements in therapists' perceived ease of use and self-efficacy, and an associated increase in intentions to use VR. METHOD: Single group mixed-methods pre-test-post-test evaluation of convenience sample of physical, occupational and rehabilitation therapists (n=37) from two brain injury rehabilitation centres. ADOPT-VR administered pre/post KT intervention, consisting of interactive education, clinical manual, technical and clinical support. RESULTS: Increases in perceived ease of use (p=0.000) and self-efficacy (p=0.001), but not behavioural intention to use VR (p=0.158) were found following KT, along with decreases in the frequency of perceived barriers. Post-test changes in the frequency and nature of perceived facilitators and barriers were evident, with increased emphasis on peer influence, organisational-level supports and client factors. Additional support needs were related to clinical reasoning, treatment programme development, technology selection and troubleshooting. CONCLUSIONS: KT strategies hold potential for targeting therapists' perceptions of low self-efficacy and ease of use of this technology. Changes in perceived barriers, facilitators and support needs at post-test demonstrated support for repeated evaluation and multi-phased training initiatives to address therapists' needs over time. Implications for Rehabilitation Therapists' learning and support needs in integrating virtual reality extend beyond technical proficiency to include clinical decision-making and application competencies spanning the entire rehabilitation process. Phased, multi-faceted strategies may be valuable in addressing therapists' changing needs as they progress from novice to experienced virtual reality users. The ADOPT-VR is a sensitive measure to re-evaluate the personal, social, environmental, technology-specific and system-level factors influencing virtual reality adoption over time.
Entities:
Keywords:
Brain injury; knowledge translation; rehabilitation; technology adoption; theory of planned behaviour; virtual reality
Authors: Olivia S Chung; Tracy Robinson; Alisha M Johnson; Nathan L Dowling; Chee H Ng; Murat Yücel; Rebecca A Segrave Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 5.435
Authors: Danielle Levac; Stephanie M N Glegg; Heidi Sveistrup; Heather Colquhoun; Patricia A Miller; Hillel Finestone; Vincent DePaul; Jocelyn E Harris; Diana Velikonja Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Liana S Cahill; Leeanne M Carey; Natasha A Lannin; Megan Turville; Cheryl L Neilson; Elizabeth A Lynch; Carol E McKinstry; Jia Xi Han; Denise O'Connor Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2020-10-15
Authors: Olivia S Chung; Tracy Robinson; Alisha M Johnson; Nathan L Dowling; Chee H Ng; Murat Yücel; Rebecca A Segrave Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2022-01-04 Impact factor: 5.435