| Literature DB >> 28508692 |
Alessandro Busca1, Federica Lessi2, Luisa Verga3, Anna Candoni4, Chiara Cattaneo5, Simone Cesaro6, Giulia Dragonetti7, Mario Delia8, Alessio De Luca9, Gaspare Guglielmi9, Mario Tumbarello10, Giordana Martino10, Gianpaolo Nadali11, Rosa Fanci12, Marco Picardi13, Leonardo Potenza14, Annamaria Nosari15, Franco Aversa16, Livio Pagano7.
Abstract
Posaconazole demonstrated clinical superiority over fluconazole and itraconazole for prophylaxis of mold infections, although concerns exist regarding the high acquisition cost for posaconazole. In this respect, we sought to analyze the costs of antifungal prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who received prophylactic posaconazole (n = 510, 58%), itraconazole (n = 120, 14%) or fluconazole (n = 175, 20%) during induction chemotherapy. The estimated cost of antifungal prophylaxis as well as the costs of subsequent systemic antifungal therapy for treatening an invasive fungal infections (IFI) was higher in the posaconazole group compared to itraconazole and fluconazole groups. Based on the Monte Carlo simulations, the itraconazole group had the highest cost, followed by the posaconazole and fluconazole group, although the overall survival was higher in the posaconazole group as compared to the other groups. In conclusion, the cost of prophylaxis with posaconazole in AML patients compares favorably with conventional antifungal agents.Entities:
Keywords: Antifungal prophylaxis; acute myeloid leukemia; antifungal treatment; cost
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28508692 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1318438
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Leuk Lymphoma ISSN: 1026-8022