Literature DB >> 28508184

Nationwide cross-sectional adherence to mammography screening guidelines: national behavioral risk factor surveillance system survey results.

Anand Narayan1, Alexander Fischer2, Zihe Zhang3, Ryan Woods4, Elizabeth Morris5, Susan Harvey4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Varying recommendations about breast cancer screening have generated much confusion about when and how often to undergo mammography screening, yet there is limited population-based data about the extent to which patients adhere to various mammographic screening guidelines in practice. Our purpose was to evaluate population-based adherence to mammographic screening using criteria from major guideline-producing organizations.
METHODS: Women aged 40-74 in the 2014 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System survey were included. Self-reported mammographic screening within 1 or 2 years, according to major guideline-producing organizations (American Cancer Society [ACS], US Preventative Services Task Force [USPSTF], American College of Radiology [ACR], American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists [ACOG]) was calculated with logistic regression, adjusting for demographics and indices of access to health care.
RESULTS: 159,123 women were included. By age category, cross-sectional adherence to USPSTF guidelines ranged from 76 to 81%, ACS (55-81%) and ACR/ACOG (45-64%) with increasing age being associated improved adherence. The highest proportions of women undergoing mammographic screening were seen in women ages 65-69 (66% within last year, 81% within last 2 years). Statistically significant predictors of adherence to mammography screening included increased income category (OR 1.08, 1.07-1.09), higher education category (OR 1.13, 1.11-1.16), and increased access to health care (OR 2.25, 1.94-2.60), adjusted for age categories.
CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to mammography screening was closest to USPSTF guidelines with 76-81% cross-sectional adherence. Frequency of screening increases with age with highest screening proportions in women ages 65-69 (66% within last year, 81% within last 2 years). For all screening guidelines, adherence to mammography screening remains poor in women with limited access to health insurance with less than half of women obtaining recommended screening.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adherence; Breast cancer; Guidelines; Mammography; Screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28508184     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-017-4286-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  14 in total

1.  A mixed methods study: Midlife African American women's knowledge, beliefs, and barriers to well-woman visit, flu vaccine, and mammogram use.

Authors:  Vida Henderson; Jessica M Madrigal; Arden Handler
Journal:  J Women Aging       Date:  2018-11-22

2.  Potential of using mammography screening appointments to identify high-risk women: cross sectional survey results from the national health interview survey.

Authors:  Anand K Narayan; Sarah F Mercaldo; Yasha P Gupta; Erica T Warner; Constance D Lehman; Randy C Miles
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Racial and ethnic disparities among state Medicaid programs for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Florence K Tangka; Sujha Subramanian; Lee Rivers Mobley; Sonja Hoover; Jiantong Wang; Ingrid J Hall; Simple D Singh
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Understanding Patient and Clinical Stakeholder Perspectives to Improve Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Leah Tuzzio; Sarah Brush; Kelly Ehrlich; Hongyuan Gao; Melissa L Anderson; Lorella Palazzo
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2021-06-02

5.  Cumulative Advanced Breast Cancer Risk Prediction Model Developed in a Screening Mammography Population.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Shuai Chen; Marzieh K Golmakani; Brian L Sprague; Jeffrey A Tice; Anna N A Tosteson; Garth H Rauscher; Louise M Henderson; Diana S M Buist; Janie M Lee; Charlotte C Gard; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 11.816

6.  The association between social media use for health related information and compliance with breast and cervical cancer screenings.

Authors:  HyounKyoung G Park; Young-Il Kim; Warner K Huh; Sejong Bae
Journal:  Res Rep (Montgomery, Ala.)       Date:  2020-05-07

7.  Increasing referral of at-risk women for genetic counseling and BRCA testing using a screening tool in a community breast imaging center.

Authors:  Banu K Arun; Susan K Peterson; Lilian E Sweeney; Rachel D Bluebond; Rebecca S S Tidwell; Sukh Makhnoon; Anne C Kushwaha
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-08-23       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Sensitive and specific multi-cancer detection and localization using methylation signatures in cell-free DNA.

Authors:  M C Liu; G R Oxnard; E A Klein; C Swanton; M V Seiden
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Suzanne Vang; Laurie R Margolies; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  The Prevalence and Associated Factors of Cancer Screening Uptake Among a National Population-Based Sample of Adults in Marshall Islands.

Authors:  Supa Pengpid; Chao Zhang; Karl Peltzer
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.302

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.