Literature DB >> 28508180

A study evaluating the effects of throat packs during nasal surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

Ali Al-Lami1,2, Kwamena Amonoo-Kuofi3, Praneta Kulloo4, Raj Lakhani5, Navin Prakash6, Nazir Bhat6.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were to identify differences in post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) and throat pain between throat packed and non-packed patient groups in nasal surgery. This was a prospective, double blind, randomised controlled trial. A water-soaked throat pack gauze was inserted in the mouth to occlude the oropharynx was used in the throat pack group. The second group received no throat pack. A validated PONV questionnaire was completed 6 h post-operatively. Visual analogue scores (VAS) for throat pain were completed in recovery, 2, and 6 h post-operatively. 80 patients were enrolled (40 into each group based on power calculation). With regard to the primary outcome measure, mean PONV score for the throat pack group was 2.75 [median 0, standard deviation (SD 10.86)] and the mean PONV score for the non-packed group was 0.36 (median 0, SD 1.39). The difference in PONV was not statistically significant [P value 0.375, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.19 to 3.32]. With regard to throat pain VAS scores (our secondary outcome measure), in recovery, the mean throat pain VAS score for the throat packed group was 2.5 (median 1, SD 2.8) and the mean throat pain VAS score for the non-throat packed group was 1.3 (median 0, SD 2.5). Statistical analysis showed a significant difference between the two groups with the throat pack group experiencing more throat pain in recovery (P value 0.018 (95% CI 1.13-2.52). At 2 and 6 h post-operatively, the mean throat pain VAS scores for the throat packed group were 2.1 and 2.3, respectively, and the mean throat pain VAS score for the non-throat packed group was 2.3 and 1.4, respectively. Statistical analysis showed non-significant difference between the two groups at 2 and 6 h post-operatively. The use of throat packs in nasal surgery does not confer PONV reduction benefit. The use of throat pack, however, is associated with a small but statistically significant more throat pain in the initial recovery period from nasal operations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nasal surgery; Post-operative nausea and vomiting; Throat packs; Throat pain

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28508180     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4589-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  14 in total

1.  INCIDENCE OF SORE THROAT FOLLOWING ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION.

Authors:  C J HARTSELL; C R STEPHEN
Journal:  Can Anaesth Soc J       Date:  1964-05

2.  Minor sequelae of anaesthesia: a pilot study.

Authors:  J EDMONDS-SEAL; N H EVE
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Sore throat after anaesthesia.

Authors:  C M CONWAY; J S MILLER; F L SUGDEN
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1960-05       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Reducing the risk of retained throat packs after surgery.

Authors:  S Colbert; M Jackson; M Turner; P A Brennan
Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 1.651

5.  Pharyngeal packing is a predisposing factor for postoperative aphthous stomatitis in nasal surgery.

Authors:  Kerem Erkalp; Yasemin Arzu Korkut; Aysenur Meric; Volkan Kahya; Orhan Gedikli; Ozlem Kucuk Su; Leyla Saitoglu
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-03-20       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 6.  Review of the use of throat packs in nasal surgery.

Authors:  V Jaiswal; G C Bedford
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 1.469

7.  A survey of postoperative nasal packing among UK ENT surgeons.

Authors:  Costa Repanos; Stephen E McDonald; Amir H Sadr
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Postoperative throat complaints after tracheal intubation.

Authors:  A M Christensen; H Willemoes-Larsen; L Lundby; K B Jakobsen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 9.166

9.  The efficacy of pharyngeal packing during routine nasal surgery--a prospective randomised controlled study.

Authors:  S I Basha; E McCoy; R Ullah; J B Kinsella
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  The Effect of Pharyngeal Packing during Nasal Surgery on the Incidence of Post Operative Nausea, Vomiting, and Sore Throat.

Authors:  Ali Karbasforushan; Behzad Hemmatpoor; Behnam Reza Makhsosi; Tayebeh Mahvar; Parisa Golfam; Behrooz Khiabani
Journal:  Iran J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  Gastric Negative Pressure Suction Method Reduces the Incidence of PONV after Orthognathic Surgery.

Authors:  Jia Wang; Zhenzhen Zhang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-05-20

2.  A randomized, double-blind study of the ultrasound assessment of the effect of pharyngeal packing on perioperative gastric volume in nasal surgery.

Authors:  M Emrah Temel; Tolga Totoz; Kerem Erkalp; Gulen Safiye Temel; Aysin Selcan
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  The use of throat packs in pediatric cleft lip/palate surgery: a retrospective study.

Authors:  B J A Smarius; C H A L Guillaume; G Jonker; A B Mink van der Molen; C C Breugem
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.573

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.