Georgia M Beasley1, Yinin Hu2, Linda Youngwirth3, Randall P Scheri3, April K Salama4, Kara Rossfeld5, Syed Gardezi2, Doreen M Agnese5, J Harrison Howard5, Douglas S Tyler6, Craig L Slingluff2, Alicia M Terando5. 1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. Georgia.beasley@osumc.edu. 2. Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA. 3. Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 4. Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. 5. Division of Surgical Oncology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely performed for primary cutaneous melanomas; however, limited data exist for SLNB after locally recurrent (LR) or in-transit (IT) melanoma. METHODS: Data from three centers performing SLNB for LR/IT melanoma (1997 to the present) were reviewed, with the aim of assessing (1) success rate; (2) SLNB positivity; and (3) prognostic value of SLNB in this population. RESULTS: The study cohort included 107 patients. Management of the primary melanoma included prior SLNB for 56 patients (52%), of whom 10 (18%) were positive and 12 had complete lymph node dissections (CLNDs). In the present study, SLNB was performed for IT disease (48/107, 45%) or LR melanoma (59/107, 55%). A sentinel lymph node (SLN) was removed in 96% (103/107) of cases. Nodes were not removed for four patients due to lymphoscintigraphy failures (2) or nodes not found during surgery (2). SLNB was positive in 41 patients (40%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 31.5-50.5), of whom 35 (88%) had CLND, with 13 (37%) having positive nonsentinel nodes. Median time to disease progression after LR/IT metastasis was 1.4 years (95% CI 0.75-2.0) for patients with a positive SLNB, and 5.9 years (95% CI 1.7-10.2) in SLNB-negative patients (p = 0.18). There was a trend towards improved overall survival for patients with a negative SLNB (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: SLNB can be successful in patients with LR/IT melanoma, even if prior SLNB was performed. In this population, the rates of SLNB positivity and nonsentinel node metastases were 40% and 37%, respectively. SLNB may guide management and prognosis after LR/IT disease.
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is routinely performed for primary cutaneous melanomas; however, limited data exist for SLNB after locally recurrent (LR) or in-transit (IT) melanoma. METHODS: Data from three centers performing SLNB for LR/IT melanoma (1997 to the present) were reviewed, with the aim of assessing (1) success rate; (2) SLNB positivity; and (3) prognostic value of SLNB in this population. RESULTS: The study cohort included 107 patients. Management of the primary melanoma included prior SLNB for 56 patients (52%), of whom 10 (18%) were positive and 12 had complete lymph node dissections (CLNDs). In the present study, SLNB was performed for IT disease (48/107, 45%) or LR melanoma (59/107, 55%). A sentinel lymph node (SLN) was removed in 96% (103/107) of cases. Nodes were not removed for four patients due to lymphoscintigraphy failures (2) or nodes not found during surgery (2). SLNB was positive in 41 patients (40%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 31.5-50.5), of whom 35 (88%) had CLND, with 13 (37%) having positive nonsentinel nodes. Median time to disease progression after LR/IT metastasis was 1.4 years (95% CI 0.75-2.0) for patients with a positive SLNB, and 5.9 years (95% CI 1.7-10.2) in SLNB-negative patients (p = 0.18). There was a trend towards improved overall survival for patients with a negative SLNB (p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: SLNB can be successful in patients with LR/IT melanoma, even if prior SLNB was performed. In this population, the rates of SLNB positivity and nonsentinel node metastases were 40% and 37%, respectively. SLNB may guide management and prognosis after LR/IT disease.
Authors: Prathamesh M Kulkarni; Eric J Robinson; Jing Wang; Yvonne M Saenger; Jaya Sarin Pradhan; Robyn D Gartrell-Corrado; Bethany R Rohr; Megan H Trager; Larisa J Geskin; Harriet M Kluger; Pok Fai Wong; Balazs Acs; Emanuelle M Rizk; Chen Yang; Manas Mondal; Michael R Moore; Iman Osman; Robert Phelps; Basil A Horst; Zhe S Chen; Tammie Ferringer; David L Rimm Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Robyn D Gartrell; Douglas K Marks; Emanuelle M Rizk; Margaret Bogardus; Camille L Gérard; Luke W Barker; Yichun Fu; Camden L Esancy; Gen Li; Jiayi Ji; Shumin Rui; Marc S Ernstoff; Bret Taback; Sarabjot Pabla; Rui Chang; Sandra J Lee; John J Krolewski; Carl Morrison; Basil A Horst; Yvonne M Saenger Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2019-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Vladimir Sadkin; Viktor Sкuridin; Evgeny Nesterov; Elena Stasyuk; Alexander Rogov; Natalya Varlamova; Roman Zelchan Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 4.379