| Literature DB >> 28508135 |
Melvin F Siliakus1, John van der Oost2, Servé W M Kengen2.
Abstract
The cytoplasmic membrane of a prokaryotic cell consists of a lipid bilayer or a monolayer that shields the cellular content from the environment. In addition, the membrane contains proteins that are responsible for transport of proteins and metabolites as well as for signalling and energy transduction. Maintenance of the functionality of the membrane during changing environmental conditions relies on the cell's potential to rapidly adjust the lipid composition of its membrane. Despite the fundamental chemical differences between bacterial ester lipids and archaeal ether lipids, both types are functional under a wide range of environmental conditions. We here provide an overview of archaeal and bacterial strategies of changing the lipid compositions of their membranes. Some molecular adjustments are unique for archaea or bacteria, whereas others are shared between the two domains. Strikingly, shared adjustments were predominantly observed near the growth boundaries of bacteria. Here, we demonstrate that the presence of membrane spanning ether-lipids and methyl branches shows a striking relationship with the growth boundaries of archaea and bacteria.Entities:
Keywords: Adaptation; Archaea; Bacteria; Lipids; Membranes
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28508135 PMCID: PMC5487899 DOI: 10.1007/s00792-017-0939-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Extremophiles ISSN: 1431-0651 Impact factor: 2.395
Fig. 1Common bacterial and archaeal lipid variations and the lipid divide. The lipid divide is presented by three colours. Grey hydrocarbon chains are represented by fatty acids in bacteria and isoprenoid chains in archaea. Red in bacteria, ester-bonds typically link the hydrocarbon chains to the glycerol backbone. In archaea, hydrocarbon chains are attached to the glycerol backbone by ether-bonds. Yellow the backbone moiety in bacterial lipids is represented by glycerol-3-phosphate (a–d). In archaeal lipids the backbone moiety is represented by the enantiomeric glycerol-1-phosphate (e–h). Common variations on the bacterial ‘phosphatidic acid’ (a) are presented by anteiso- and iso-branched chain fatty acids or ether bonds shown in (b). c and d show branched chain GDGTs with iso-diabolic acid and diabolic acid with either ester or ether bonds, respectively. Common variations on the archaeal ‘archaetidic acid’ (e) are presented by a fusion of the isoprenoid tail ends to form macrocyclic archaeol (f). Archaeal bipolar glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraether (GDGT-0) is depicted in g and spans the membrane to form lipid monolayers. h shows GDGT-2, this bipolar lipid contains 2 cyclopentane rings in the phytanyl chains. Head groups are presented either by R1 phosphate polar heads, or R2 single or multiple hexoses
Fig. 2Variations in fatty acid chain conformation. From top to bottom common fatty acid modifications are depicted: β-hydroxy fatty acid, ω-cyclohexyl fatty acid, cyclopropane fatty acid, iso-branched chain fatty acid, anteiso-branched chain fatty acid, saturated straight chain fatty acid, trans-unsaturated fatty acid, cis-unsaturated fatty acid, diabolic acid, iso-diabolic acid, ether bound fatty acid.
Adapted from (Chintalapati et al. 2004; Denich et al. 2003)
Physiological membrane adaptations by core lipid modifications typically found in bacterial and archaeal extremophiles
| Bacteria | Temperature | pH | Pressure | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| pHmin <3 | pHmax >10 | >70 MPa | |||||||
| Level of chain length | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||||
| shorter chain ≤C14 | + | (7,8) | + | (31, 33) | + | (42, 43) | |||||
| longer chain ≥C18 | |||||||||||
| Level of unsaturation | |||||||||||
| PUFA | + | (1–3) | + | (39) | |||||||
| MUFA-cis | + | (7,8, 40) | + | (21) | + | (33) | + | (44) | |||
| MUFA-trans | + | (8) | |||||||||
| Level of branching | |||||||||||
| BCFA-iso | + | (4,15,41) | + | (29) | + | (38, 42–44) | |||||
| BCFA- | + | (4) | + | (29, 32) | + | (44) | |||||
| Diabolic acid | + | (18, 45) | + | (35) | |||||||
| (β)-hydroxy FA | + | (8) | + | (30, 33) | |||||||
| Level of cyclization | |||||||||||
| Ω-Cyclohexyl | + | (29, 32) | |||||||||
| Cyclopropyl | + | (7) | + | (21) | + | (30, 33) | |||||
| Level of tetraester and etherlipids | |||||||||||
| Tetraesters | + | (22, 46) | |||||||||
| Mono- di- tetraethers | + | (18–21) | + | (34, 35) | |||||||
| Level of terpenes | |||||||||||
| Polar carotenoid | + | (5,6) | + | (16, 17) | |||||||
| Non-polar terpenes | + | (44) | |||||||||
| Other modifications | |||||||||||
| Cardiolipins | + | (7) | + | (44) | |||||||
| Glycolipids | + | (7) | + | (16) | |||||||
| BMP | + | (44) | |||||||||
References: 1: Russell (1997), 2: Shivaji and Prakash (2010), 3: Zsiros et al. (2000), 4: Oshima and Miyagawa (1974), 5: Chattopadhyay et al. (1997), 6: Jagannadham et al. (2000), 7: Guan et al. (2013), 8: Wan et al. (2016), 9: Nichols et al. (2004), 10: Gibson et al. (2005), 11: Sprott et al. (1997), 12: Cario et al. (2015), 13: De Rosa et al. (1980), 14: Uda et al. (2004), 15: Patel et al. (1991), 16: Ray et al. (1971), 17: Yokoyama et al. (1996), 18: Damsté et al. (2007), 19: Langworthy et al. (1983), 20: Huber et al. (1992), 21: Jahnke et al. (2001), 22: Huber et al. (1989), 23: Matsuno et al. (2009), 24: De Rosa et al. (1987), 25: Hafenbradl et al. (1996), 26: Ulrih et al. (2009), 27: Schleper et al. (1995), 28: Kaneshiro and Clark (1995), 29: De Rosa et al. (1974), 30: Wichlacz et al. (1986), 31: Wakao et al. (1994), 32: Matsubara et al. (2002), 33: Mykytczuk et al. (2010), 34: Weijers et al. (2006), 35: Damste et al. (2011), 36: Macalady et al. (2004), 37: Uda et al. (2001), 38: Clejan et al. (1986), 39: Nogi and Kato (1999), 40: Knoblauch et al. (1999), 41: Heinen et al. (1970), 42: Li et al. (1994), 43: Prowe and Antranikian (2001), 44: Clejan et al. (1986), 45: Balk et al. (2009), 46: Lee et al. (2002), 47: Namwong et al. (2007), 48: Feng et al. (2005), 49: Castillo et al. (2006), 50: Xu et al. (2001), 51: Xu et al. (1999), 52: Lanzotti et al. (1989), 53: Tindall et al. (1984), 54: Grant et al. (1985), 55: Takai et al. (2000), 56: Sako et al. (1996), 57: Sprott et al. (1991), 58: Hu et al. (2008), 59: Bowers and Wiegel (2011), 60: Schleper et al. (1995), 61: Feng et al. (2005), 62: Xu et al. (2001), 63: Lanzotti et al. (1989)
PUFA polyunsaturated fatty acids, MUFA-cis cis-monounsaturated fatty acids, MUFA-trans trans-monounsaturated fatty acids, BCFA-iso iso-branched chain fatty acids, BCFA-anteiso anteiso-branched chain fatty acids, BMP bis-mono-acylglycero-phosphate, TE tetraethers, + increased production, − decreased production
Fig. 3Bacterial growth temperature optima versus percentage BCFAs. Documented growth temperature optima of 48 bacteria plotted against the percentage of BCFAs of the respective bacterium. The trend shows that at low growth temperatures, BCFA percentages are generally low, while at moderate and high growth temperatures, BCFA percentages are variable
Fig. 4Reported maximal, optimal and minimal growth temperatures of presently studied most extreme hyperthermophiles and psychrophiles. Hyperthermophilic bacteria and archaea are depicted in the upper panels and grouped according to increasing maximal growth temperature. Psychrophilic bacteria and archaea are depicted in the lower panels and grouped according to decreasing minimal growth temperature
Fig. 5Reported maximal, optimal and minimal pressure-values of presently studied most extreme piezophiles/barophiles. Barophilic bacteria and archaea are grouped according to increasing maximal pressure tolerance
Fig. 6Reported maximal, optimal and minimal pH-values of presently studied most extreme acidophiles and alkaliphiles. Acidophilic bacteria and archaea are depicted in the upper panels and grouped according to decreasing minimal pH values. Alkaliphilic bacteria and archaea are depicted in the lower panels and grouped according to increasing maximal pH values