| Literature DB >> 28507472 |
Jin-Woo Jeong1,2, Jongsik Kim3, Eun Ok Choi1,2, Da Hye Kwon1,2, Gyu Min Kong4, Il-Whan Choi5, Bum Hoi Kim6, Gi-Young Kim7, Ki Won Lee8, Ki Young Kim8, Sung Goo Kim8, Young Whan Choi9, Su Hyun Hong1, Cheol Park10, Yung Hyun Choi1,2.
Abstract
Schisandrae Fructus, the fruit of Schisandra chinensis (Turcz.) Baill., is widely used in traditional medicine for the treatment of a number of chronic diseases. Although, Schisandrae Fructus was recently reported to attenuate the interleukin (IL)-1β-induced inflammatory response in chondrocytes in vitro, its protective and therapeutic potential against osteoarthritis (OA) in an animal model remains unclear. Therefore, we investigated the effects of the ethanol extract of Schisandrae Fructus (SF) on inflammatory responses and cartilage degradation in a monosodium iodoacetate (MIA)-induced OA rat model. Our results demonstrated that administration with SF had a tendency to attenuate MIA-induced damage of articular cartilage as determined by a histological grade of OA. SF significantly suppressed the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α in MIA-induced OA rats. SF also effectively inhibited expression of inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase and cyclooxygenase-2, thereby inhibiting the release of NO and prostaglandin E2. In addition, the elevated levels of matrix metalloproteinases-13 and two biomarkers for diagnosis and progression of OA, such as cartilage oligomeric matrix protein and C-telopeptide of type II collagen, were markedly ameliorated by SF administration. These findings indicate that SF could be a potential candidate for the treatment of OA.Entities:
Keywords: MIA; Schisandrae Fructus; cartilage degradation; inflammatory responses; osteoarthritis
Year: 2017 PMID: 28507472 PMCID: PMC5427464 DOI: 10.17179/excli2017-119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EXCLI J ISSN: 1611-2156 Impact factor: 4.068
Figure 1Effects of SF on knee joint swelling in MIA-induced OA rats. (A) Photographs of the hind knee joint at 3 weeks after the model of MIA-induced OA rats. (B) The severity of osteoarthritis during the course of MIA was determined by measuring the volume of the hind knee joint using calibrated digital caliper. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8) (**p < 0.01 MIA group vs. control group; ###p < 0.001 SF+MIA treatment groups vs. MIA group)
Figure 2Histological evaluation of joints activity after administration with SF in MIA-induced OA rats. Rats were injected with 3 mg MIA in the right knee. SF was administered orally daily for 3 weeks after MIA injection. (A) The knee joints of OA rats treated with either SF or vehicle control were stained with H&E, Safranin O and toluidine blue. (B) The joint lesions were graded on a scale of 0-13 using the modified Mankin scoring system, giving a combined score for cartilage structure, cellular abnormalities, and matrix staining. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8) (*p < 0.05 MIA group vs. normal control group; #p < 0.05 SF+MIA treatment groups vs. MIA group)
Figure 3Effects of SF on the cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α) production in the serum of MIA-induced OA rats. Rats were injected with 3 mg MIA in the right knee. SF was administered orally daily for 3 weeks after MIA injection. (A) The concentrations of IL-1β, (B) IL-6 and (C) TNF-α in serum collected from MIA-induced OA rats treated with or without SF. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8) (*p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 MIA group vs. normal control group; #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 SF+MIA treatment groups vs. MIA group)
Figure 4Effects of SF on the production of NO and PGE2, and expression of iNOS and COX-2 in MIA-induced OA rats. The contents of NO (A) and PGE2 (B) were measured in the serum of MIA-induced OA rat using Griess reaction and commercial ELISA kit, respectively. (C and D) Immunohistochemical staining was used to identify the expression of iNOS and COX-2 in the articular cartilage. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8) (*p < 0.05 MIA group vs. normal control group; **p < 0.01 MIA group vs. normal control group; #p < 0.05 SF+MIA treatment groups vs. MIA group; ##p < 0.01 SF+MIA treatment groups vs. MIA group)
Figure 5Effects of SF on the expression of MMP-13 in MIA-induced OA rats. (A) The immunohistochemical staining was used to identify the expression of MMP13 in the articular cartilage. (B) Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8) (*p < 0.05 MIA group vs. normal control group; #p < 0.05 SF+MIA treatment groups vs. MIA group)
Figure 6Effects of SF on production and expression of COMP and CTX-Ⅱ in MIA-induced OA rats. (A and B) The COMP and CTX-II production were measured in the serum of MIA-induced OA rat using a commercial ELISA kits. (C and D) Immunohistochemical staining was used to identify the expression of COMP and CTX-II in the articular cartilage. Data were expressed as mean ± SD (n = 8) (*p < 0.05 MIA group vs. normal control group; **p < 0.01 MIA group vs. normal control group; #p < 0.05 SF+MIA treatment groups vs. MIA group)