Literature DB >> 28506487

A review of monopolar motor mapping and a comprehensive guide to continuous dynamic motor mapping for resection of motor eloquent brain tumors.

P Schucht1, K Seidel2, A Jilch2, J Beck2, A Raabe2.   

Abstract

Monopolar mapping of motor function differs from the most commonly used method of intraoperative mapping, i.e. bipolar direct electrical stimulation at 50-60Hz (Penfield technique mapping). Most importantly, the monopolar probe emits a radial, homogenous electrical field different to the more focused inter-tip bipolar electrical field. Most users combine monopolar stimulation with the short train technique, also called high frequency stimulation, or train-of-five techniques. It consists of trains of four to nine monopolar rectangular electrical pulses of 200-500μs pulse length with an inter stimulus interval of 2-4msec. High frequency short train stimulation triggers a time-locked motor-evoked potential response, which has a defined latency and an easily quantifiable amplitude. In this way, motor thresholds might be used to evaluate a current-to-distance relation. The homogeneous electrical field and the current-to-distance approximation provide the surgeon with an estimate of the remaining distance to the corticospinal tract, enabling the surgeon to adjust the speed of resection as the corticospinal tract is approached. Furthermore, this stimulation paradigm is associated with a lower incidence of intraoperative seizures, allowing continuous stimulation. Hence, monopolar mapping is increasingly used as part of a strategy of continuous dynamic mapping: ergonomically integrated into the surgeon's tools, the monopolar probe reliably provides continuous/uninterrupted feedback on motor function. As part of this strategy, motor mapping is not any longer a time consuming interruption of resection but rather a radar-like, real-time information system on the spatial relationship of the current resection site to eloquent motor structures.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Continuous dynamic mapping; Glioma surgery; Intraoperative neuromonitoring; Monopolar motor mapping; Motor-evoked potential

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28506487     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2017.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurochirurgie        ISSN: 0028-3770            Impact factor:   1.553


  8 in total

Review 1.  Essential Management of Pediatric Brain Tumors.

Authors:  Katharina Lutz; Stephanie T Jünger; Martina Messing-Jünger
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02

2.  Surgery of Motor Eloquent Glioblastoma Guided by TMS-Informed Tractography: Driving Resection Completeness Towards Prolonged Survival.

Authors:  Carolin Weiss Lucas; Andrea Maria Faymonville; Ricardo Loução; Catharina Schroeter; Charlotte Nettekoven; Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens; Karl Josef Langen; N Jon Shah; Gabriele Stoffels; Volker Neuschmelting; Tobias Blau; Hannah Neuschmelting; Martin Hellmich; Martin Kocher; Christian Grefkes; Roland Goldbrunner
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Continuous dynamic mapping to avoid accidental injury of the facial nerve during surgery for large vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Kathleen Seidel; Matthias S Biner; Irena Zubak; Jonathan Rychen; Jürgen Beck; Andreas Raabe
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Clinical Pearls and Methods for Intraoperative Motor Mapping.

Authors:  Marco Rossi; Tommaso Sciortino; Marco Conti Nibali; Lorenzo Gay; Luca Viganò; Guglielmo Puglisi; Antonella Leonetti; Henrietta Howells; Luca Fornia; Gabriella Cerri; Marco Riva; Lorenzo Bello
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Intraoperative mapping of pre-central motor cortex and subcortex: a proposal for supplemental cortical and novel subcortical maps to Penfield's motor homunculus.

Authors:  Prajwal Ghimire; Jose Pedro Lavrador; Asfand Baig Mirza; Noemia Pereira; Hannah Keeble; Marco Borri; Luciano Furlanetti; Christian Brogna; Jozef Jarosz; Richard Gullan; Francesco Vergani; Ranjeev Bhangoo; Keyoumars Ashkan
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Continuous subcortical language mapping in awake glioma surgery.

Authors:  Hans W Axelson; Francesco Latini; Malin Jemstedt; Mats Ryttlefors; Maria Zetterling
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Transcranial versus direct electrical stimulation for intraoperative motor-evoked potential monitoring: Prognostic value comparison in asleep brain tumor surgery.

Authors:  Luca Viganò; Vincenzo Callipo; Marta Lamperti; Marco Rossi; Marco Conti Nibali; Tommaso Sciortino; Lorenzo Gay; Guglielmo Puglisi; Antonella Leonetti; Gabriella Cerri; Lorenzo Bello
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  The PROGRAM study: awake mapping versus asleep mapping versus no mapping for high-grade glioma resections: study protocol for an international multicenter prospective three-arm cohort study.

Authors:  Jasper Kees Wim Gerritsen; Clemens Maria Franciscus Dirven; Steven De Vleeschouwer; Philippe Schucht; Christine Jungk; Sandro M Krieg; Brian Vala Nahed; Mitchel Stuart Berger; Marike Lianne Daphne Broekman; Arnaud Jean Pierre Edouard Vincent
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 3.006

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.