Thomas F X O'Donnell1, Sarah E Deery1, Jeremy D Darling1, Katie E Shean1, Murray A Mittleman2, Gabrielle N Yee1, Matthew R Dernbach1, Marc L Schermerhorn3. 1. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass. 2. Cardiovascular Epidemiology Research Unit, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Mass. 3. Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass. Electronic address: mscherm@bidmc.harvard.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lipid management guidelines recommend high-intensity statins for all patients ≤75 years old with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and moderate-intensity statins for CLTI patients >75 years old without contraindications or on dialysis, but these recommendations are based primarily on coronary and stroke data. We aimed to validate these guidelines in patients with CLTI and to assess current adherence to these recommendations. METHODS: We identified all patients with CLTI who underwent first-time revascularization (endovascular or surgical) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2005 to 2014. Patients were classified as taking high-intensity, moderate-intensity, low-intensity, or no statin postoperatively. Outcomes included death and major adverse limb event (MALE). Propensity scores were calculated for the probability of receiving guideline-recommended intensity of statin therapy to account for nonrandom assignment of treatments. Cox regression models were constructed and adjusted for the propensity scores and further adjusted for strong potential confounders. RESULTS: After excluding patients on hemodialysis (n = 252), we identified 1019 limbs from 931 patients with a median follow-up of 380 days. Patients discharged on the recommended statin intensity had higher rates of preoperative statin use, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, stroke, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery bypass grafting; they had lower smoking rates and were less likely to be ambulatory preoperatively. Overall, only 35% were taking the recommended statin dosage: 55% of those >75 years old and 20% of those ≤75 years old. In multivariable analysis including propensity scores where appropriate, discharge on any statin was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.90; P < .01). Discharge on the recommended intensity of statin therapy was associated with lower mortality (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.99; P < .05) and lower MALE rate (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97; P < .05). Patients >75 years old and ≤75 years old accrued similar benefit. In patients >75 years old, moderate-intensity statin therapy was associated with lower rates of death and MALE compared with high-intensity therapy but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the recommended intensity of statin therapy in compliance with 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lipid management guidelines is associated with significantly improved survival and lower MALE rate in patients undergoing revascularization for CLTI. Adherence to current guidelines is an appealing target for quality improvement.
OBJECTIVE: The 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lipid management guidelines recommend high-intensity statins for all patients ≤75 years old with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and moderate-intensity statins for CLTI patients >75 years old without contraindications or on dialysis, but these recommendations are based primarily on coronary and stroke data. We aimed to validate these guidelines in patients with CLTI and to assess current adherence to these recommendations. METHODS: We identified all patients with CLTI who underwent first-time revascularization (endovascular or surgical) at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2005 to 2014. Patients were classified as taking high-intensity, moderate-intensity, low-intensity, or no statin postoperatively. Outcomes included death and major adverse limb event (MALE). Propensity scores were calculated for the probability of receiving guideline-recommended intensity of statin therapy to account for nonrandom assignment of treatments. Cox regression models were constructed and adjusted for the propensity scores and further adjusted for strong potential confounders. RESULTS: After excluding patients on hemodialysis (n = 252), we identified 1019 limbs from 931 patients with a median follow-up of 380 days. Patients discharged on the recommended statin intensity had higher rates of preoperative statin use, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, stroke, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, and coronary artery bypass grafting; they had lower smoking rates and were less likely to be ambulatory preoperatively. Overall, only 35% were taking the recommended statin dosage: 55% of those >75 years old and 20% of those ≤75 years old. In multivariable analysis including propensity scores where appropriate, discharge on any statin was associated with lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.90; P < .01). Discharge on the recommended intensity of statin therapy was associated with lower mortality (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.60-0.99; P < .05) and lower MALE rate (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.97; P < .05). Patients >75 years old and ≤75 years old accrued similar benefit. In patients >75 years old, moderate-intensity statin therapy was associated with lower rates of death and MALE compared with high-intensity therapy but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the recommended intensity of statin therapy in compliance with 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association lipid management guidelines is associated with significantly improved survival and lower MALE rate in patients undergoing revascularization for CLTI. Adherence to current guidelines is an appealing target for quality improvement.
Authors: Sidney C Smith; Emelia J Benjamin; Robert O Bonow; Lynne T Braun; Mark A Creager; Barry A Franklin; Raymond J Gibbons; Scott M Grundy; Loren F Hiratzka; Daniel W Jones; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Margo Minissian; Lori Mosca; Eric D Peterson; Ralph L Sacco; John Spertus; James H Stein; Kathryn A Taubert Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Joseph P Drozda; T Bruce Ferguson; Hani Jneid; Harlan M Krumholz; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Jeffrey W Olin; Henry H Ting; Paul A Heidenreich; Nancy M Albert; Paul S Chan; Lesley H Curtis; T Bruce Ferguson; Gregg C Fonarow; P Michael Ho; Sean O'Brien; Andrea M Russo; Randal J Thomas; Henry H Ting; Paul D Varosy Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes Date: 2015-12-14
Authors: Neil J Stone; Jennifer G Robinson; Alice H Lichtenstein; C Noel Bairey Merz; Conrad B Blum; Robert H Eckel; Anne C Goldberg; David Gordon; Daniel Levy; Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Patrick McBride; J Sanford Schwartz; Susan T Shero; Sidney C Smith; Karol Watson; Peter W F Wilson; Karen M Eddleman; Nicole M Jarrett; Ken LaBresh; Lev Nevo; Janusz Wnek; Jeffrey L Anderson; Jonathan L Halperin; Nancy M Albert; Biykem Bozkurt; Ralph G Brindis; Lesley H Curtis; David DeMets; Judith S Hochman; Richard J Kovacs; E Magnus Ohman; Susan J Pressler; Frank W Sellke; Win-Kuang Shen; Sidney C Smith; Gordon F Tomaselli Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michael S Conte; Frank B Pomposelli; Daniel G Clair; Patrick J Geraghty; James F McKinsey; Joseph L Mills; Gregory L Moneta; M Hassan Murad; Richard J Powell; Amy B Reed; Andres Schanzer; Anton N Sidawy Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2015-01-28 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Pierre Amarenco; Julien Bogousslavsky; Alfred Callahan; Larry B Goldstein; Michael Hennerici; Amy E Rudolph; Henrik Sillesen; Lisa Simunovic; Michael Szarek; K M A Welch; Justin A Zivin Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-08-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Maria Teresa B Abola; Deepak L Bhatt; Sue Duval; Patrice P Cacoub; Iris Baumgartner; Hong Keo; Mark A Creager; Danielle M Brennan; Ph Gabriel Steg; Alan T Hirsch Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2012-01-24 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Dharam J Kumbhani; Ph Gabriel Steg; Christopher P Cannon; Kim A Eagle; Sidney C Smith; Shinya Goto; E Magnus Ohman; Yedid Elbez; Piyamitr Sritara; Iris Baumgartner; Subhash Banerjee; Mark A Creager; Deepak L Bhatt Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2014-02-28 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Curt Diehm; Jens Rainer Allenberg; David Pittrow; Matthias Mahn; Gerhart Tepohl; Roman L Haberl; Harald Darius; Ina Burghaus; Hans Joachim Trampisch Journal: Circulation Date: 2009-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: P Michael Ho; David J Magid; Susan M Shetterly; Kari L Olson; Thomas M Maddox; Pamela N Peterson; Frederick A Masoudi; John S Rumsfeld Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Thomas F X O'Donnell; Sarah E Deery; Katie E Shean; Murray A Mittleman; Jeremy D Darling; Mohammad H Eslami; Randall R DeMartino; Marc L Schermerhorn Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2018-03-23 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Jeremy D Darling; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Sarah E Deery; Anthony V Norman; Giap H Vu; Raul J Guzman; Mark C Wyers; Allen D Hamdan; Marc L Schermerhorn Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Jeremy D Darling; Thomas F X O'Donnell; Giap H Vu; Anthony V Norman; Emily St John; Lars Stangenberg; Mark C Wyers; Allen D Hamdan; Marc L Schermerhorn Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2020-08-29 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Simin Hua; Carmen R Isasi; Jorge R Kizer; Kunihiro Matsushita; Matthew A Allison; Wassim Tarraf; Qibin Qi; Sonia G Ponce; Martha Daviglus; Robert C Kaplan Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 5.501