Literature DB >> 28505662

Asymmetries between convergence and divergence reveal tonic vergence is dependent upon phasic vergence function.

Ian M Erkelens1, William R Bobier1.   

Abstract

Horizontal vergence eye movements are controlled by two processes, phasic and slow-tonic. Slow-tonic responses are hypothesized to be stimulated by the faster, pulse-step neural output of the phasic system. This suggests that the general behavior of each system should be similar; however, this relationship has yet to be investigated directly. We characterize the relationship between phasic and tonic vergence by quantifying directional asymmetries in the response properties of each mechanism to the same disparity amplitudes. Four subjects viewed symmetric steps in disparity dichoptically at 40 cm while eye movements were recorded with infrared oculography. First- and second-order phasic and slow-tonic convergence response properties increased linearly with disparity demand (p < 0.01), whereas divergence responses did not (p > 0.05). Phasic divergence responses were slower than convergence (p = 0.012) and were associated with a higher frequency of saccades (p < 0.001). The average rate of slow-tonic change was correlated to the average peak velocity of phasic vergence at the same vergence demand in both directions, r = 0.78, p < 0.0001. Clear directional asymmetries were observed in phasic and tonic vergence responses. The response properties of the slow-tonic mechanism varied directly with the peak velocity of the complementary phasic system. These results provide empirical evidence of the relationship between phasic and slow-tonic vergence, suggesting that the latter depends on the motor function of the former, specifically the peak velocity. The recruitment of additional oculomotor mechanisms, such as saccades, improved the phasic response properties of the slower divergence mechanism but did not directly influence the response behavior of the slow-tonic mechanism.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28505662     DOI: 10.1167/17.5.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  5 in total

1.  Functional anatomy of human extraocular muscles during fusional divergence.

Authors:  Joseph L Demer; Robert A Clark
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Comparison of symmetrical prism adaptation to asymmetrical prism adaptation in those with normal binocular vision.

Authors:  Elio M Santos; Chang Yaramothu; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Differential diagnosis of vergence and saccade disorders in dyslexia.

Authors:  Lindsey M Ward; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Target Eccentricity and Form Influences Disparity Vergence Eye Movements Responses: A Temporal and Dynamic Analysis.

Authors:  Chang Yaramothu; Rajbir S Jaswal; Tara L Alvarez
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 0.957

5.  Reflexive Fusional Vergence and Its Plasticity Are Impaired in Convergence Insufficiency.

Authors:  Ian M Erkelens; William R Bobier
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.799

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.