Literature DB >> 28505401

The influence of a composite hospital volume on outcomes for gastric cancer surgery: A Dutch population-based study.

Linde A D Busweiler1, Johan L Dikken1, Daniel Henneman1, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen2, Vincent K Y Ho3, Rob A E M Tollenaar1, Michel W J M Wouters4, Johanna W van Sandick4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Volume-outcome associations for complex surgical procedures have motivated centralization of care worldwide. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between overall hospital experience with complex upper gastrointestinal (GI) cancer resections and outcomes after gastric cancer surgery.
METHODS: Data on all patients (n = 4837) who underwent a resection for non metastatic invasive gastric cancer between 2005 and 2014 were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Annual hospital volume categories were based on the combined volume of gastrectomies, esophagectomies, and pancreatectomies (composite hospital volume). Volume-outcome analyses were performed for lymph node yield, 30-day mortality, and overall survival.
RESULTS: The proportion of gastric cancer resections performed in hospitals with an annual composite hospital volume of ≥40 upper GI cancer resections increased from 6% in 2005 to 80% in 2014. A higher composite hospital volume was univariably associated with a higher lymph node yield, lower 30-day mortality, and increased overall survival. Statistical significance was lost after adjusting for case mix. But, sub group analysis including only elderly patients (≥75 years) showed a significant association between composite hospital volume and 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSION: In the Netherlands, an increasing proportion of gastric cancer resections is performed in hospitals with a high composite hospital volume of gastric, esophageal, and pancreatic cancer resections. Special attention is warranted to referral of elderly patients, as these patients might specifically benefit from this centralization.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastrectomy; gastric cancer; high-volume hospitals; quality improvement; quality of health care; standard of care

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28505401     DOI: 10.1002/jso.24562

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Enhanced recovery after surgery-Does the ERAS concept keep its promises].

Authors:  Wolfgang Schwenk
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Increased assessment of HER2 in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Willemieke P M Dijksterhuis; Rob H A Verhoeven; Sybren L Meijer; Marije Slingerland; Nadia Haj Mohammad; Judith de Vos-Geelen; Laurens V Beerepoot; Theo van Voorthuizen; Geert-Jan Creemers; Martijn G H van Oijen; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Evaluation of the Implementation of FDG-PET/CT and Staging Laparoscopy for Gastric Cancer in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Emma C Gertsen; Alicia S Borggreve; Hylke J F Brenkman; Rob H A Verhoeven; Erik Vegt; Richard van Hillegersberg; Peter D Siersema; Jelle P Ruurda
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Quality Over Volume: Modeling Centralization of Gastric Cancer Resections in Italy.

Authors:  Laura Lorenzon; Alberto Biondi; Annamaria Agnes; Ottavio Scrima; Roberto Persiani; Domenico D'Ugo
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.720

5.  Timeliness of cancer care in a regional Victorian health service: A comparison of high-volume (Lung) and low-volume (oesophagogastric) tumour streams.

Authors:  Mwila Kabwe; Amanda Robinson; Yachna Shethia; Carol Parker; Robert Blum; Ilana Solo; Michael Leach
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-10-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.