Literature DB >> 28505188

Early childhood lung function is a stronger predictor of adolescent lung function in cystic fibrosis than early Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection.

Jessica E Pittman1, Hannah Noah2, Hollin E Calloway3, Stephanie D Davis4, Margaret W Leigh5,6, Mitchell Drumm7, Scott D Sagel8, Frank J Accurso8, Michael R Knowles6, Marci K Sontag8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been suggested as a major determinant of poor pulmonary outcomes in cystic fibrosis (CF), although other factors play a role. Our objective was to investigate the association of early childhood Pseudomonas infection on differences in lung function in adolescence with CF.
METHODS: Two populations of subjects with CF were studied: from the Gene Modifier Study (GMS), 346 F508del homozygotes with severe vs. mild adolescent lung disease, and from the Colorado Newborn Screen Study (NBS) 172 subjects diagnosed with CF by newborn screening. Associations of Pseudomonas infection and lung function in early childhood with lung function in adolescence were investigated using multivariate linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: Among GMS subjects, those with severe adolescent lung disease had worse lung function in childhood (FEV1 25 percentage points lower) compared to subjects with mild adolescent lung disease, regardless of early childhood Pseudomonas status. Among NBS subjects, those with lowest adolescent lung function had significantly lower early childhood lung function and faster rate of decline in FEV1 than subjects with highest adolescent lung function; early Pseudomonas infection was not associated with rate of FEV1 decline. The strongest predictor of adolescent lung function was early childhood lung function. Subjects with a higher percentage of cultures positive for Pseudomonas before age 6 or a lower BMI at 2-4 years old also had lower adolescent lung function, though these associations were not as strong as with early childhood lung function.
CONCLUSIONS: In separate analyses of two distinct populations of subjects with CF, we found a strong correlation between lower lung function in early childhood and adolescence, regardless of early childhood Pseudomonas status. Factors in addition to early Pseudomonas infection have a strong impact on lung function in early childhood in CF. Further exploration may identify novel underlying genetic or environmental factors that predispose children with CF to early loss of lung function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28505188      PMCID: PMC5432103          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a chronic, life-limiting genetic illness in which dysfunction of the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) causes impaired mucociliary clearance, leading to chronic pulmonary disease, among other symptoms[1-4]. Lung disease in CF begins in infancy and is characterized by a cycle of chronic inflammation, infection, and airway damage causing progressive obstructive airways disease and loss of lung function[1-11]. Despite the early onset of pathology, patients with CF show marked variability in phenotype, disease severity, and survival[12-16]. Previous studies have tried to explain this heterogeneity by investigating factors associated with lower lung function in CF, including environmental (lower socioeconomic status, tobacco exposure)[17-20], nutritional[15, 21, 22], infectious (bacterial, viral, and fungal)[15, 21–32], and genetic (CFTR genotype and effects of various modifier genes)[12, 33–35]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection, in particular, has been associated with more rapid decline in lung function and more severe lung disease; earlier acquisition of Pa has been associated with poorer lung function in adulthood and higher risk of death in childhood. This has led to widespread adoption of Pa eradication protocols in children with CF[36, 37]. We have previously shown in a large, retrospective case-control study that earlier age of Pa infection (before 5 years of age) was strongly associated with severe (vs. mild) CF lung disease in adolescence and adulthood[29]. However, we hypothesized that multiple other factors are involved in determining lung function in early childhood in CF, and that early Pa infection alone would not account for differences in lung function in early childhood that persist into adolescence, even in a cohort of children diagnosed by newborn screening with subsequent aggressive early management of CF lung disease. Our primary objective was to investigate the association between early childhood lung function, early Pa infection, and adolescent lung function in subjects with CF. We also aimed to investigate other factors associated with early lung function in children with CF. To accomplish this, we tested our hypothesis in two separate datasets: the Gene Modifier Study (GMS), a retrospective, case-control study with annualized data, used in our original publication[29], and the Colorado Newborn Screen (NBS) Study, a prospectively collected, encounter-based study.

Materials and methods

Populations & variables

Gene Modifier Study (GMS)

A multicenter, retrospective case-control study of subjects with CF, all F508del homozygotes, classified as having either severe or mild adolescent lung function (defined as FEV1 in the highest or lowest quartiles for FEV1 percent predicted by birth cohort, respectively–an extremes of phenotype design), using annualized data from the CF Foundation Patient Registry (CFFPR)[29, 35]. Written informed consent was obtained for all subjects. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Analysis was restricted to subjects in our previous publication (n = 629)[29] with a) spirometry (PFTs) at 6–8 years of age, b) respiratory culture data before 6 years of age, and c) classification of adolescent lung disease severity at age 12 or older (to avoid overlap with early childhood FEV1 data). Definitions of key variables: Pa status: ever/never recorded as having a culture positive for Pa before 6 years of age. Early childhood lung function: defined as the mean FEV1 percent predicted (FEV1) between 6–8 years of age (Wang)[38]. Best FEV1 between 6 and 8 years of age was also calculated. Calculations utilized all available spirometric data from the CFFPR. Mild vs. severe adolescent lung disease: defined based on GMS enrollment criteria[35].

Colorado Newborn Screen database (NBS)

The NBS database consists of prospectively collected, encounter-based clinical data (supplemented by CFFPR data) for subjects diagnosed with CF from 1982–2010 at the Children’s Hospital Colorado [39, 40]. Informed consent was obtained for all subjects. This study was approved by the Colorado Multiple Institutional Review Board, University of Colorado, Denver. For this study, analysis was restricted to subjects who a) were pancreatic insufficient, b) had BMI data available at 2–4 years of age, c) had respiratory culture data available before 6 years of age, d) had PFT data between 6 and 8 years of age, and e) had PFT data available at age 10 or older. Definitions of key variables: Early childhood lung function: defined as the mean FEV1 percent predicted (FEV1) at 6–8 years of age (Wang)[38]. Best FEV1 at 6 to 8 years of age was also calculated. Calculations utilized all available spirometric data from the CFFPR. Adolescent lung function: defined as the mean FEV1 percent predicted (Hankinson)[41] for the last 3 years of available PFT data beginning at 10 years of age or older. Subjects were divided into even quartiles by adolescent lung function for bivariate analysis. This variable was treated as continuous for regression analysis. Number of spirometric measures: counts defined separately for both early childhood and adolescent lung function variables. Mean age at PFTs: defined separately for early childhood and adolescent variables. Early childhood infection status: Pa status: ever/never culture-positive for Pa before 6 years of age, Percentage of cultures positive for Pa prior to 6 years of age, S. aureus status: ever/never culture-positive for S. aureus before 6 years of age, Percentage of cultures positive for S. aureus prior to 6 years of age, Number of respiratory cultures before 6 years of age. Early childhood nutritional status: Mean BMI Z-score from 2 to 4 years of age, Mean height Z-score from 2 to 4 years of age, Mean weight Z-score from 2 to 4 years of age[42]. Absolute change in FEV1 percent predicted from early childhood to adolescence: defined as mean early childhood FEV1 percent predicted minus the mean adolescent FEV1 percent predicted; Rate of change in FEV1 (percent predicted/year): defined as the absolute change in FEV1 percent predicted / (mean age at adolescent PFTs–mean age at early childhood PFTs) Other variables included for both analyses were gender, race (Caucasian vs. non-Caucasian), ethnicity (Hispanic vs. non-Hispanic), year of birth, age at diagnosis, means of diagnosis (newborn screen, meconium ileus at presentation, and symptoms [respiratory, gastrointestinal, or failure to thrive]), CFTR genotype, and age of first recorded respiratory culture.

Analyses (NBS, GMS)

Bivariate analyses used Student’s t-test and χ2 testing to compare means or proportions, respectively. Multiple comparisons were accounted for in the NBS cohort using ANOVA testing with Bonferroni correction. Comparisons consisted of: Comparison of population characteristics by adolescent lung function group (GMS: severe vs. mild adolescent lung function; NBS: adolescent FEV1 quartile). GMS: Comparison of early FEV1 in subjects with severe vs. mild adolescent FEV1, by early childhood Pa status. GMS: Comparison of early FEV1 in subjects who were Pa positive vs. negative in early childhood, by severe vs. mild adolescent lung function group. NBS: Comparison of early FEV1 by adolescent FEV1 quartile and by early childhood Pa status. NBS: Comparison of early FEV1 in subjects Pa positive vs. negative in early childhood, by adolescent FEV1 quartile. NBS: Comparison of rate of change and absolute change in FEV1 percent predicted from early childhood to adolescence by adolescent FEV1 quartile and early childhood Pa status. NBS: Comparison of rate of change and absolute change in FEV1 percent predicted from early childhood to adolescence in subjects Pa positive vs. negative in early childhood by adolescent FEV1 quartile. Multivariate linear regression with backwards elimination of covariates was used to define the association of early childhood characteristics and adolescent lung function (as the primary outcome) for the NBS dataset. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant for all bivariate analyses. Variables initially included in multivariate regression model were based on bivariate analyses and results from previous publications. Covariates included in the full model were: early childhood FEV1, gender, year of birth, diagnosis by newborn screen (yes/no), age at CF diagnosis, genotype (F508del homozygous vs. other), number of discrete PFTs included in early childhood FEV1 variable, number of discrete PFTs included in adolescent FEV1 variable, number of discrete cultures prior to 6 years of age, percentage of cultures positive for Pa prior to 6 years of age, percentage of cultures positive for S. aureus prior to 6 years of age, mean BMI percentile at 2 to 4 years of age, and number of discrete BMI values between 2 and 4 years of age. Variables were removed from the model based on evaluation of p values (p<0.05) and partial F testing.

Results

Table 1 presents population characteristics for the GMS and NBS datasets (datasets available as supporting information files 1 & 2). NBS subjects were, on average, born later, diagnosed at a younger age (median 0.07 years vs. 0.35 years), and had respiratory culture data earlier than GMS subjects. Approximately 50% of NBS subjects were F508del homozygous, vs. 100% of GMS subjects. Approximately 17% (27/172) of the NBS cohort were diagnosed by meconium ileus and 4/172 were missed on the newborn screen and diagnosed later. The mean age at definition of adolescent lung function was 15.5 and 17.4 years for NBS and GMS subjects, respectively.
Table 1

Population characteristics of GMS and NBS subjects.

GMS groupNBS group
 n = 346n = 172
Female49% (n = 169)49% (n = 85)
F508del homozygous100%52% (n = 90)
Year of birth (median, range)1985 (1979–1993)1991 (1982–2000)
Age (years) at diagnosis (median)0.350.07
Diagnosed by newborn screening3% (n = 12)81% (n = 140)*
Diagnosed with meconium ileus25% (n = 88)16% (n = 27)
Culture data  
Age (years) at first culture2.5 (±1.9)0.4 (±0.7)
Number of cultures prior to age 612.1 (±6.6)
Pseudomonas aeruginosa before age 663% (n = 218)53% (n = 91)
Non-mucoid Pa52% (n = 89)
Mucoid Pa14% (n = 24)
Percentage of cultures Pa positive before age 611% (±17)
Age (years) first Pa under age 6 (of those Pa pos.)3.5 (±1.8)2.5 (±1.8)
Staphylococcus aureus before age 664% (n = 223)84% (n = 144)
Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus84% (n = 144)
Methicillin-resistant S. aureus3% (n = 6)
Percentage of cultures Staph positive before age 632% (±25)
Age (years) first Staph under age 63.4 (±1.9)1.7 (±1.6)
Anthropometric data  
Mean BMI Z-score at 2–4 years of age-0.4 (±1.3)
Lung function data  
Mean FEV1 percent predicted age 6–8 years86.8% (±20.4)94.2% (±14.5)
Mean FEV1 percent predicted in adolescence**84.9% (±18.8)
Mean age of adolescent PFTs (or definition of GMS severity)17.4 (±2.9)15.5 (±3.6)

* Additional 5 subjects w/ false-negative newborn screening, remainder diagnosed with meconium ileus

† Limited data available (annualized CF Registry data)

** Adolescent lung function defined as severe vs. mild in GMS study by birth cohort

* Additional 5 subjects w/ false-negative newborn screening, remainder diagnosed with meconium ileus † Limited data available (annualized CF Registry data) ** Adolescent lung function defined as severe vs. mild in GMS study by birth cohort

GMS population

Of the 629 F508del homozygous subjects initially enrolled and described elsewhere[29], 346 met inclusion criteria (Fig 1). Over 60% of subjects had at least one culture positive for Pa prior to 6 years of age.
Fig 1

GMS population: Inclusion/Exclusion of subjects.

Subjects from the parent GMS study included in current analysis were limited to those who a) had lung function data between age 6 and 8, b) were enrolled in the GMS study at 12 years of age or greater, and c) had respiratory culture data available prior to age 6. Definition of adolescent lung function occurred at time of GMS enrollment; age cutoff was created to separate time of definition of adolescent lung function from early childhood lung function.

GMS population: Inclusion/Exclusion of subjects.

Subjects from the parent GMS study included in current analysis were limited to those who a) had lung function data between age 6 and 8, b) were enrolled in the GMS study at 12 years of age or greater, and c) had respiratory culture data available prior to age 6. Definition of adolescent lung function occurred at time of GMS enrollment; age cutoff was created to separate time of definition of adolescent lung function from early childhood lung function. GMS subjects were stratified into four subgroups by Pa infection status at age 6 (ever vs. never Pa positive prior to 6 years of age) and adolescent lung disease group (severe vs. mild). Subjects in the four sub-groups did not differ significantly by gender distribution, age at diagnosis, age of definition of adolescent lung function, or presence of other respiratory pathogens in early childhood (data not shown). Age of first culture was younger in subjects who were Pa positive in early childhood whether they had mild or severe lung function in adolescence (Mean age (years) at first culture in the mild adolescent lung disease group was 2.22 vs. 3.51 for Pa positive and negative subjects, respectively, p<0.05. Mean age at first culture in the severe adolescent lung disease groups were—2.18 vs. 3.51 for Pa positive and negative subjects, respectively, p<0.05). Similarly, Pa positive subjects had a higher mean number of respiratory cultures before age 6 regardless of lung function in adolescence (number of cultures among subjects with mild adolescent lung disease—4.56 vs. 3.11 for Pa positive and negative subjects, respectively, p<0.05. Number of cultures among subjects with severe adolescent lung disease—4.86 vs. 2.57 for Pa positive and negative subjects, p<0.05). Fig 2 illustrates differences in early lung function among the four GMS subgroups. Among subjects who were Pa positive in early childhood, mean FEV1 at 6–8 years of age was lower in those with severe vs. mild adolescent lung disease (72.4% ± 15.8 and 99.4% ±13.1, respectively) (p<0.0001). Among Pa-negative subjects, there was a similar difference in early childhood FEV1 between those with severe vs. mild adolescent lung disease (79.1% ± 16.7 and 103.2% ± 14, respectively) (p<0.0001). In comparing subjects with severe lung disease later in life, mean early childhood FEV1 was ~8 percentage points lower in those subjects who were Pa-positive before age 6 (p = 0.01); however, there was no significant difference in early FEV1 between Pa positive and negative subjects with mild adolescent lung disease.
Fig 2

GMS population: Early childhood lung function by Pa status before age 6 and severe vs. mild lung disease in adolescence.

Mean FEV1 percent predicted at 6 to 8 years of age is plotted by classification of lung disease in adolescence (severe vs. mild) and Pa infectious status up to age 6 (ever vs. never culture positive for Pa).

GMS population: Early childhood lung function by Pa status before age 6 and severe vs. mild lung disease in adolescence.

Mean FEV1 percent predicted at 6 to 8 years of age is plotted by classification of lung disease in adolescence (severe vs. mild) and Pa infectious status up to age 6 (ever vs. never culture positive for Pa).

NBS population

Of 434 subjects included in the Colorado NBS database, 172 were included in final analysis; the majority excluded were not old enough to have “adolescent” lung function data available at 10 years of age or older (Fig 3).
Fig 3

Colorado NBS population–Inclusion/Exclusion of subjects.

Subjects in Colorado NBS analysis were limited to those 10 years of age or older at the time of analysis in order to have “adolescent” lung function data available. Subjects included in analysis were required to have data on respiratory cultures before age 6, BMI at age 2 to 4, lung function at age 6 to 8, and lung function over age 10.

Colorado NBS population–Inclusion/Exclusion of subjects.

Subjects in Colorado NBS analysis were limited to those 10 years of age or older at the time of analysis in order to have “adolescent” lung function data available. Subjects included in analysis were required to have data on respiratory cultures before age 6, BMI at age 2 to 4, lung function at age 6 to 8, and lung function over age 10.

Comparison by adolescent lung function quartile

NBS subjects were first divided into even quartiles by adolescent lung function (n = 43 in each quartile), then further divided by Pa status in early childhood. When comparing NBS subjects by lung function quartile in adolescence, subjects with lower adolescent lung function were born earlier and had a higher percentage of cultures positive for Pa prior to age 6 than adolescents with higher lung function (Table 2). There were no significant differences in nutritional status, age of first culture, number of cultures before age 6, percentage of subjects Pa-positive before age 6, or age at first Pa-positive culture between the adolescent lung function quartile groups. Subjects with lower adolescent lung function had significantly lower FEV1 at 6 to 8 years of age than those in the higher adolescent lung function quartiles (Table 2).
Table 2

Colorado NBS population characteristics by adolescent lung function quartile.

Lowest quartile2nd quartile3rd quartileHighest quartile
n = 43n = 43n = 43n = 43p (ANOVA or chi2)
Female58%42%42%56%0.3
F508del homozygous58%44%47%60%0.3
Year of birth1989.6 (±5)1991.8 (±4.6)1992.2 (±3.8)1993.5 (±5)0.002
Age (years) at diagnosis0.1 (±0.4)0.1 (±0.1)0.07 (±0.07)0.1 (±0.2)0.6
Diagnosed by newborn screening*81%72%84%88%0.3
Diagnosed with meconium ileus16%21%16%9%0.5
Culture data     
Age (years) at first culture0.5 (±1)0.3 (±0.3)0.4 (±0.8)0.2 (±0.3)0.3
Number of cultures prior to age 611.3 (±7.6)11.7 (±6.1)11.3 (±5.7)14.2 (±6.7)0.1
Pseudomonas aeruginosa before age 667%47%49%49%0.2
non-mucoid Pa65%47%47%49%0.2
mucoid Pa19%16%14%7%0.4
Percentage of cultures Pa positive before age 631% (±26)16% (±7)18% (±12)16% (±9)0.0002
Age (years) first Pa under age 62.2 (±1.6)2.7 (±2)2.8 (±1.7)2.3 (±2)0.6
Staphylococcus aureus (all w MSSA) before age 679%74%88%93%0.08
MRSA2%2%2%7%0.6
Percentage of cultures Staph positive before age 628% (±25)32% (±27)35% (±27)33% (±21)0.5
Age (years) first Staph under age 62 (±1.5)1.7 (±1.5)1.7 (±1.7)1.5 (±1.6)0.7
Nutritional data     
Mean BMI Z-score at 2–4 years of age-0.8 (±2)-0.3 (±0.9)-0.3 (±1)-0.1 (±0.8)0.08
Mean BMI percentile at 2–4 years of age36% (±28)42% (±24)40% (±27)46% (±24)0.37
number anthropomorphic measures age 2–45 (±3.8)7 (±5)6.9 (±3.4)7.2 (±3.6)0.049
Lung function data     
Mean FEV1 percent predicted age 6–8 years84% (±13)92.2% (±12.5)95.5% (±11.2)105.3% (±12.7)<0.0001
Best FEV1 percent predicted age 6–8 years96.2% (±15.3)104.2% (±11.7)106.1% (±11.8)116.4% (±12.6)<0.0001
Number of PFTs included age 6–8 years7.5 (±5.7)7.5 (±6.3)6.6 (±3.3)7.8 (±3.9)0.7
Mean FEV1 percent predicted in adolescence58.9% (±11.7)82.1% (±3.9)92.3% (±3)106.4% (±7.2)-
Best FEV1 percent predicted in adolescence73.9% (±14.5)95.6% (±8.6)101.8% (±6.3)113.7 (±8.5)-
Number of PFTs included in adolescent data21.9 (±18.8)17.4 (±12.1)11.7 (±11.6)12.3 (±13.2)0.003
Mean age of adolescent PFTs16.9 (±3.6)15.8 (±3.4)15.2 (±2.4)14.2 (±4.2)0.004

* Additional 5 subjects w/ false-negative newborn screening, remainder diagnosed with meconium ileus

* Additional 5 subjects w/ false-negative newborn screening, remainder diagnosed with meconium ileus

Comparison by adolescent lung function quartile and early Pa status

Fig 4 illustrates differences in early childhood lung function by adolescent lung function quartile and early childhood Pa status. Early childhood FEV1 was significantly lower in subjects with poorer adolescent lung function who were Pa positive before age 6 (mean early childhood FEV1 78% (±13), 89% (±7), 94% (±11), and 107% (±12) for lowest to highest adolescent lung function groups, p<0.0001). Though a similar pattern was seen in the Pa negative group, differences did not reach statistical significance (mean early childhood FEV1 93% (±7), 95% (±16), 97% (±11), and 103% (±13) for lowest to highest adolescent lung function group, p = 0.065). When comparing Pa positive and negative subjects by adolescent lung function quartile, Pa positive subjects in the lowest adolescent lung function quartile had significantly lower early childhood lung function than Pa negative (78% (±13) vs. 93% (±6), p< 0.001); differences in early childhood FEV1 between Pa positive and negative subjects in the other quartiles were not statistically significant (p = 0.09, 0.18, 0.86 for 2nd lowest, 3rd, and highest quartiles, respectively).
Fig 4

Colorado NBS Population: Early childhood lung function by adolescent lung function quartile and early childhood Pa status.

Early childhood lung function (mean FEV1 at 6–8 years of age) by adolescent lung function quartile and early childhood Pa status (ever/never Pa positive before age 6). Subjects were first divided into even quartiles by adolescent lung function (n = 43 in each quartile), then further divided by Pa status in early childhood. Among Pa positive subjects, those in the lowest adolescent lung function quartile had significantly lower early childhood lung function compared to all other quartiles; differences in early childhood lung function among Pa negative subjects did not reach statistical significance. When comparing subjects within individual adolescent lung function quartiles, Pa positive subjects in the lowest adolescent lung function quartile had significantly lower early childhood lung function than Pa negative (p<0.001); otherwise there were no significant differences in early childhood lung function by Pa status within adolescent lung function quartiles.

Colorado NBS Population: Early childhood lung function by adolescent lung function quartile and early childhood Pa status.

Early childhood lung function (mean FEV1 at 6–8 years of age) by adolescent lung function quartile and early childhood Pa status (ever/never Pa positive before age 6). Subjects were first divided into even quartiles by adolescent lung function (n = 43 in each quartile), then further divided by Pa status in early childhood. Among Pa positive subjects, those in the lowest adolescent lung function quartile had significantly lower early childhood lung function compared to all other quartiles; differences in early childhood lung function among Pa negative subjects did not reach statistical significance. When comparing subjects within individual adolescent lung function quartiles, Pa positive subjects in the lowest adolescent lung function quartile had significantly lower early childhood lung function than Pa negative (p<0.001); otherwise there were no significant differences in early childhood lung function by Pa status within adolescent lung function quartiles. There was a significant decline in FEV1 percent predicted from early childhood to adolescence in the two lowest adolescent lung function quartiles, with a decrease of 25 percentage points and 10 percentage points in lowest and 2nd lowest quartiles, respectively (p<0.0001 for both). There was no significant change in mean FEV1 from early childhood to adolescence in the higher two adolescent lung function quartiles (Table 3). Similarly, rate of decline in FEV1 from childhood to adolescence (percent predicted per year) was significantly higher in subjects in the two lowest adolescent lung function quartiles (Table 3).
Table 3

Colorado NBS Population: Absolute change and annual rate of change (percent predicted per year) in FEV1 percent predicted from early childhood to adolescence by adolescent lung function quartile.

Absolute change in FEV1 was defined as mean FEV1 percent predictedage 6–8 minus mean FEV1 percent predictedadolescent. Annual rate of change was defined as absolute change in FEV/ (mean age adolescent PFTs–mean age early childhood PFTs).

 Mean FEV1Best FEV1
 meanpmeanp
LOWEST QUARTILE
change in % predicted (child—adolescent)-25.1<0.0001-22.3<0.0001
annual rate of change-2.8 (±2.1)*-1.1 (±1.6)*
2nd QUARTILE
change in % predicted (child—adolescent)-10.1<0.0001-8.6<0.0001
annual rate of change-2.4 (±3.3)-1 (±1.5)
3rd QUARTILE
change in % predicted (child—adolescent)-3.20.06-4.40.03
annual rate of change-1.7 (±2.1)-0.5 (±2.1)
HIGHEST QUARTILE
change in % predicted (child—adolescent)1.10.5-2.70.09
annual rate of change-1.1 (±2.7) -0.5 (±1.8) 

* p value for difference among any of the 4 quartiles (ANOVA) < 0.001

† p value comparing lowest quartile to all other quartiles <0.001

‡ p value comparing 2nd quartile to highest quartile <0.003

Colorado NBS Population: Absolute change and annual rate of change (percent predicted per year) in FEV1 percent predicted from early childhood to adolescence by adolescent lung function quartile.

Absolute change in FEV1 was defined as mean FEV1 percent predictedage 6–8 minus mean FEV1 percent predictedadolescent. Annual rate of change was defined as absolute change in FEV/ (mean age adolescent PFTs–mean age early childhood PFTs). * p value for difference among any of the 4 quartiles (ANOVA) < 0.001 † p value comparing lowest quartile to all other quartiles <0.001 ‡ p value comparing 2nd quartile to highest quartile <0.003 Table 4 shows annual rate of decline (percent predicted per year) in FEV1 from early childhood to adolescence by adolescent lung function quartile and early childhood Pa status. Subjects with the lowest adolescent lung function had significantly faster annual rates decline in FEV1 than all other subjects; mean FEV1 percent predicted in the two highest quartiles appeared nearly stable from childhood to adolescence (by both percent predicted and rate of decline). Importantly, rate of decline did not differ significantly within adolescent lung function quartiles when comparing subjects by early childhood Pa status (Table 4).
Table 4

Colorado NBS Population: Annual rate of change in FEV1 percent predicted from childhood to adolescence by adolescent lung function quartile and Pa status before 6 years of age.

Adolescent Lung Function Quartile
Lowest quartilen = 432nd quartilen = 433rd quartilen = 43Highest quartilen = 43
Mean (SD)Pa negativen = 14Pa positiven = 29Pa negativen = 23Pa positiven = 20Pa negativen = 22Pa positiven = 21Pa negativen = 22Pa positiven = 21
FEV1 age 6–892.9 (±6.8)*79.7 (±13.2)94.6 (±15.6)89.5 (±7.1)97.1 (±11.5)93.9 (±11)**103.2 (±13)107.4 (±12.4)**
Annual rate of change in FEV1% predicted-2.6 (±0.9)-2.8 (±2.5)-1.2 (±1.9)-0.9 (±1.1)-0.4 (±1.6)-0.1 (±1.4)0.6 (±1.5)-0.1 (±1.7)

* p<0.05 comparing Pa positive and negative groups within adolescent lung function quartile

† p<0.05 compared to lowest adolescent lung function quartile group with same Pa status

** p<0.05 compared to 2nd adolescent lung function quartile group with same Pa status

* p<0.05 comparing Pa positive and negative groups within adolescent lung function quartile † p<0.05 compared to lowest adolescent lung function quartile group with same Pa status ** p<0.05 compared to 2nd adolescent lung function quartile group with same Pa status For all comparisons discussed above, similar patterns were seen when comparing best early childhood FEV1 as opposed to mean (data not shown).

Linear regression

Variables included in the final linear regression model (after backwards elimination of covariates) were: adolescent FEV1, early childhood FEV1, BMI Z-score at 2–4 years of age, percentage of cultures positive for Pa before age 6, number of cultures obtained before age 6, number of PFTs included in the early childhood lung function variable, number of PFTs included in the adolescent lung function variable, gender, year of birth, and age at diagnosis. We found a strong association between lower early childhood FEV1 and lower adolescent FEV1 (p<0.001, Table 5). Higher percentage of cultures positive for Pa prior to age 6 was also significantly associated with lower adolescent FEV1 (p = 0.02), though the effect appeared markedly less than that of early childhood FEV1. Contribution to the explained variance of the full model was 0.1957 for mean early childhood FEV1 vs. 0.0157 for percentage of cultures positive for Pa before age 6. In this model, predicted mean adolescent FEV1 increased by 19.7 percent predicted when early childhood FEV1 was increased from the 25th percentile (85.5% predicted) to the 95th percentile (117.4%), while it decreased by only 5.8% when percentage of cultures positive for Pa was increased from the 25th percentile (0%) to the 95th percentile (36.8% positive) (see Fig 5). Lower BMI in early childhood also showed a significant association with lower adolescent lung function (p = 0.005). Neither the simple presence of Pa prior to age 6 (yes/no dichotomous variable for at least one positive culture) nor the presence or percentage of cultures positive for S. aureus prior to age 6 were significantly associated with adolescent FEV1.
Table 5

Colorado NBS population: Linear regression, association with mean adolescent FEV1 percent predicted.

Results of linear regression investigating association of early childhood events/exposures with mean adolescent FEV1 percent predicted. All variables with p<0.05 are shown; the model was also adjusted for gender, age at diagnosis, number of respiratory cultures prior to age 6, and number of PFTs used to calculate early childhood FEV1. Variables eliminated from the model included genotype (F508del homozygous yes/no), diagnosis by newborn screening, percentage of cultures positive for S. aureus prior to age 6, and number of measures included in BMI value.

95% CI
VARIABLEß coeffSELower 95%Upper 95%p value
Mean FEV1%predicted age 6 to 80.6160.0770.4650.768<0.001
Percent of cultures Pa positive before age 6-0.1590.070-0.297-0.0210.024
Year of birth1.030.3190.3971.660.002
BMI z-score age 2 to 42.370.8260.7434.010.005
Number of PFTs used to calculate mean adolescent FEV1-0.3240.078-0.478-0.17<0.001

Also adjusted for gender, age at diagnosis, number of cultures age 0–6, number of PFTs age 6–8 (these variables were also included in regression analysis, but without significant p value).

Fig 5

NBS linear regression: Predicted adolescent lung function is more strongly associated with early childhood FEV1 than with percentage of cultures positive for Pa in early childhood.

Subject values for mean early childhood and adolescent FEV1 are shown in scatterplot, with subjects Pa positive in early childhood represented by gray triangles, Pa negative by black circles. Superimposed lines represent NBS linear regression results showing predicted adolescent FEV1 (with 95% confidence intervals—dashed lines) by early childhood FEV1. The black line shows predicted adolescent FEV1 by early childhood FEV1 when percentage of cultures positive for Pa prior to age 6 is held at 0% (25th percentile); the grey line represents the predicted adolescent FEV1 when percentage of cultures positive for Pa prior to age 6 is held at 30% (approximately the 90th percentile for our cohort). These values were all adjusted for gender, year of birth, age at diagnosis, number of cultures before age 6, BMI Z score at 2 to 4 years of age, and number of PFT tests included in early childhood and adolescent values (all held at mean). Predicted mean adolescent FEV1 increased by 19.7 percent predicted when early childhood FEV1 was increased from the 25th percentile (85.5% predicted) to the 95th percentile (117.4%), while it decreased by only 4.8% when percentage of cultures positive for Pa was increased from the 25th percentile (0%) to the 92nd percentile (30% positive), or 5.8% when increased to 36.8% positive (95th percentile). Contribution to the explained variance of the full model was 0.1957 for mean early childhood FEV1 vs. 0.0157 for percentage of cultures positive for Pa before age 6.

NBS linear regression: Predicted adolescent lung function is more strongly associated with early childhood FEV1 than with percentage of cultures positive for Pa in early childhood.

Subject values for mean early childhood and adolescent FEV1 are shown in scatterplot, with subjects Pa positive in early childhood represented by gray triangles, Pa negative by black circles. Superimposed lines represent NBS linear regression results showing predicted adolescent FEV1 (with 95% confidence intervals—dashed lines) by early childhood FEV1. The black line shows predicted adolescent FEV1 by early childhood FEV1 when percentage of cultures positive for Pa prior to age 6 is held at 0% (25th percentile); the grey line represents the predicted adolescent FEV1 when percentage of cultures positive for Pa prior to age 6 is held at 30% (approximately the 90th percentile for our cohort). These values were all adjusted for gender, year of birth, age at diagnosis, number of cultures before age 6, BMI Z score at 2 to 4 years of age, and number of PFT tests included in early childhood and adolescent values (all held at mean). Predicted mean adolescent FEV1 increased by 19.7 percent predicted when early childhood FEV1 was increased from the 25th percentile (85.5% predicted) to the 95th percentile (117.4%), while it decreased by only 4.8% when percentage of cultures positive for Pa was increased from the 25th percentile (0%) to the 92nd percentile (30% positive), or 5.8% when increased to 36.8% positive (95th percentile). Contribution to the explained variance of the full model was 0.1957 for mean early childhood FEV1 vs. 0.0157 for percentage of cultures positive for Pa before age 6.

Colorado NBS population: Linear regression, association with mean adolescent FEV1 percent predicted.

Results of linear regression investigating association of early childhood events/exposures with mean adolescent FEV1 percent predicted. All variables with p<0.05 are shown; the model was also adjusted for gender, age at diagnosis, number of respiratory cultures prior to age 6, and number of PFTs used to calculate early childhood FEV1. Variables eliminated from the model included genotype (F508del homozygous yes/no), diagnosis by newborn screening, percentage of cultures positive for S. aureus prior to age 6, and number of measures included in BMI value. Also adjusted for gender, age at diagnosis, number of cultures age 0–6, number of PFTs age 6–8 (these variables were also included in regression analysis, but without significant p value).

Discussion

We have shown in two separate, distinct cohorts of CF subjects that lower FEV1 in early childhood (6 to 8 years of age) is strongly associated with lower FEV1 in adolescence, and that this association is only partially explained by infection with Pa before age 6; thus, other genetic and/or environmental factors, likely in early childhood, must be playing a major role. Importantly, we have also shown a striking divergence in loss of lung function among CF patients, as subjects with worse lung function in early childhood had a significantly faster rate of FEV1 decline from childhood to adolescence compared to those with better early childhood lung function. This finding holds even for those diagnosed in infancy, was the majority of NBS subjects presented for management and treatment prior to the development of respiratory symptoms, and those with worse lung function early still had a faster rate of decline. Our findings suggest that predisposing genetic and/or environmental factors and events in infancy and preschool in children with CF may have a strong impact on lung function from early childhood through adolescence and adulthood, even in children diagnosed by newborn screening. Our results are consistent with Burns’ finding that 97% of infants with CF in their clinic population had serologic or microbiologic evidence of Pa exposure before age three[43], which would suggest that growth of Pa on respiratory culture cannot be the driving force in differences in early lung function. In the GMS dataset, subjects with severe adolescent lung disease had mean early childhood FEV1 approximately 25 percentage points lower than adolescent subjects with mild disease, regardless of early childhood Pa status. In the NBS dataset, early lung function was lower in subjects with lower adolescent lung function. We acknowledge that there is an association between early Pa infection, early childhood lung function, and adolescent lung function, as subjects with lower adolescent lung function and early Pa infection appeared to have worse early childhood lung function in both study populations. This confirms that infection with Pa is one of many factors associated with lower lung function in adolescence, but our findings emphasize that, even when adjusting for chronicity or prevalence of positive cultures, Pa is not the major cause of lower lung function in children that persists into adolescence. Previous studies have shown that lung function in healthy subjects remains relatively stable when comparing percent-predicted values from childhood to adolescence[44, 45]. Studies in children with CF have noted an association with higher baseline FEV1 and more rapid rate of decline over the next 3–6 years[27, 46]. However, we found that subjects with CF with lower adolescent lung function showed significantly greater rate of decline in FEV1 percent predicted and annual rate of decline in FEV1 percent predicted from early childhood to adolescence, while those subjects with higher adolescent lung function showed no significant decline from early childhood to adolescence. This suggests that children with CF and lower FEV1 are not simply tracking along a given lung function trajectory, but have active progression and worsening of their lung disease in comparison to their healthier counterparts with CF. Our findings may differ from previous studies in follow-up time from early childhood to adolescence was relatively longer–perhaps uniformly bridging adolescence in our population resulted in different patterns of lung function decline. The NBS population was also limited to a single state population, and thus our study population was smaller and possibly more homogenous. Finally, our analysis approaches may have differed. The strongest predictor of low lung function in adolescence was low lung function in early childhood. Importantly, there were no significant differences in rate of decline when comparing Pa positive and negative subjects within adolescent lung function quartiles. Instead, subjects with lower adolescent lung function (in both Pa positive and negative groups) both started with lower early childhood lung function and showed a faster rate of decline in lung function than their counterparts with higher adolescent lung function. Those subjects with a higher percentage of respiratory cultures positive for Pa prior to age 6 also had lower lung function in adolescence, though that association was not as strong as that with early childhood lung function, and the dichotomous presence/absence of Pa prior to age 6 was not associated with adolescent lung function. This suggests that infectious burden, and possibly inflammatory response, plays a role in outcomes, though compliance with prescribed preventative treatments such as chest physiotherapy could also explain persistent decline in some children. Our findings are consistent with previous studies implicating chronic Pa infection in poorer pulmonary outcomes in patients with CF[15, 27, 29, 47], and implicating inflammation as a strong predictor of lung function decline[48]. The importance of S. aureus in CF lung disease has been a source of recent debate[28, 30, 31, 49, 50]; we found no significant association between S. aureus infection in early childhood and adolescent lung function, though we were unable to investigate the association with methicillin-resistant S. aureus due to low prevalence in our NBS population and lack of consistent reporting in our GMS population. Poor nutritional status in early childhood was also associated with lower lung function in adolescence, which is consistent with previous studies[21, 22]. Earlier year of birth was also associated with poorer adolescent lung function, which may reflect our study design, as these subjects would have been older when adolescent lung function was recorded, but could also reflect advances in management and treatment. Our findings suggest early childhood lung function, early nutritional status, and density or persistence of early Pa infection were most strongly associated with adolescent lung function in subjects with CF. Our two distinct datasets show consistent results, even though they represent different birth cohorts (straddling initiation of widespread use of inhaled tobramycin for treatment of Pa infection), had different genetic makeups and geographic origins, and likely reflected different treatment regimens (based on clinical advances from GMS to NBS birth cohorts). Both datasets had distinct advantages and complement the other well. The GMS dataset was large, representing CF centers across the U.S., and genetically homogenous (all F508del homozygotes), but was limited by use of annualized data, relatively scant data in infancy and preschool, and the extremes of phenotype design. The NBS dataset was smaller regional, but contained the full spectrum of CF lung disease (not extremes of phenotype), a representative distribution of CF genotypes, and used encounter-based, non-annualized data. Initiation of CF-directed care such as chest physiotherapy at diagnosis, and prior to development of respiratory symptoms, is another advantage in the NBS dataset and eliminates a potential confounder. Our study had several limitations. Both GMS and NBS datasets are comprised of clinically collected data; there was not uniformity in data collection frequency or variables collected. PFT data at 6–8 years of age was the earliest age at which we could determine “early” childhood lung function. Because of the annualized data in the GMS study and the extremes of phenotype design, we were not able to explore associations between early childhood events, early childhood lung function, and adolescent lung function in great detail in this population. The NBS study population had more extensive early childhood data; however, there was still substantial variability as to how much data was available on individual subjects. We were unable to include mucoid Pa or methicillin-resistant S. aureus in either analysis due to low prevalence in the NBS population, and limited data available from the CFFPR for the majority of GMS subjects. Similarly, we had limited data on other organisms such as Haemophilus influenza, Aspergillus fumigatus, or Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, and were not able to include these in our analyses, nor were we able to include differences in therapies and treatments. Finally, socioeconomic status was not reliably collected and was therefore not included in our regression model, yet socioeconomic status has been shown to be associated with worse outcomes in CF[18]. Despite these limitations, we believe the consistency of our results in two distinct populations of subjects lend support to our findings. In summary, we have shown in two distinct populations of subjects with CF that lung function in early childhood is more strongly associated with lung function in adolescence in CF than infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa before age 6. Most strikingly, we found that subjects with lower lung function in adolescence had lower lung function in early childhood and a more rapid rate of decline of FEV1 from childhood to adolescence than those subjects with higher lung function in adolescence. Annual rate of decline was not different between Pa positive and Pa negative subjects in early childhood (within adolescent lung function quartile), suggesting that long-term pulmonary outcomes and disease trajectory may be largely determined prior to lung function measures at 6 years of age. Perhaps equally important, these differences were present in a cohort of children diagnosed with CF in infancy and prior to development of respiratory symptoms. Our findings suggest genetic influences and multiple factors in infancy and preschool have a substantial impact on lung function from early childhood onwards in subjects with CF. It will be critical to further study events in early childhood in patients with CF to define these key factors for future intervention.

GMS dataset.

Variables for all subjects included in the final analysis of Gene Modifier Study population. Please contact Dr. Pittman with questions or for more details. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

NBS dataset.

Variables for all subjects included in the final analysis of the Newborn Screen Study population. Please contact Dr. Pittman with questions or for more details. (XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  47 in total

1.  Risk factors for rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in one second in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Michael W Konstan; Wayne J Morgan; Steven M Butler; David J Pasta; Marcia L Craib; Stefanie J Silva; Dennis C Stokes; Mary Ellen B Wohl; Jeffrey S Wagener; Warren E Regelmann; Charles A Johnson
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S. population.

Authors:  J L Hankinson; J R Odencrantz; K B Fedan
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Cystic fibrosis mutations and genotype-pulmonary phenotype analysis.

Authors:  Andrew T Braun; Philip M Farrell; Claude Ferec; Marie Pierre Audrezet; Anita Laxova; Zhanhai Li; Michael R Kosorok; Marjorie A Rosenberg; William M Gershan
Journal:  J Cyst Fibros       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Early pulmonary infection, inflammation, and clinical outcomes in infants with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  M Rosenfeld; R L Gibson; S McNamara; J Emerson; J L Burns; R Castile; P Hiatt; K McCoy; C B Wilson; A Inglis; A Smith; T R Martin; B W Ramsey
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2001-11

5.  Longitudinal development of mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection and lung disease progression in children with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Zhanhai Li; Michael R Kosorok; Philip M Farrell; Anita Laxova; Susan E H West; Christopher G Green; Jannette Collins; Michael J Rock; Mark L Splaingard
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-02-02       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Impact of Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus infection on inflammation and clinical status in young children with cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Scott D Sagel; Ronald L Gibson; Julia Emerson; Sharon McNamara; Jane L Burns; Jeffrey S Wagener; Bonnie W Ramsey
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Predictors of mucoid Pseudomonas colonization in cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  Hara Levy; Leslie A Kalish; Carolyn L Cannon; K Christopher García; Craig Gerard; Don Goldmann; Gerald B Pier; Scott T Weiss; A A Colin
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2008-05

8.  Lung function from infancy to the preschool years after clinical diagnosis of cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Wanda J Kozlowska; Andrew Bush; Angela Wade; Paul Aurora; Siobhán B Carr; Rosie A Castle; Ah-Fong Hoo; Sooky Lum; John Price; Sarath Ranganathan; Clare Saunders; Sanja Stanojevic; John Stroobant; Colin Wallis; Janet Stocks
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 9.  Pseudomonas acquisition in young patients with cystic fibrosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.

Authors:  Margaret Rosenfeld; Bonnie W Ramsey; Ronald L Gibson
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.155

10.  Risk factors for lung function decline in a large cohort of young cystic fibrosis patients.

Authors:  Jonathan Cogen; Julia Emerson; Don B Sanders; Clement Ren; Michael S Schechter; Ronald L Gibson; Wayne Morgan; Margaret Rosenfeld
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2015-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.