Meander E Sips1, Marc J M Bonten, Maaike S M van Mourik. 1. aJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care bDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes recent advances in the field of automated surveillance of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), with a focus on data sources and the development of semiautomated or fully automated algorithms. RECENT FINDINGS: The availability of high-quality data in electronic health records and a well-designed information technology (IT) infrastructure to access these data are indispensable for successful implementation of automated HAI surveillance. Previous studies have demonstrated that reliance on stand-alone administrative data is generally unsuited as sole case-finding strategy. Recent attempts to combine multiple administrative and clinical data sources in algorithms yielded more reliable results. Current surveillance practices are mostly limited to single healthcare facilities, but future linkage of multiple databases in a network may allow interfacility surveillance. Although prior surveillance algorithms were often straightforward decision trees based on structured data, recent studies have used a wide variety of techniques for case-finding, including logistic regression and various machine learning methods. In the future, natural language processing may enable the use of unstructured narrative data. SUMMARY: Developments in healthcare IT are rapidly changing the landscape of HAI surveillance. The electronic availability and incorporation of routine care data in surveillance algorithms enhances the reliability, efficiency and standardization of surveillance practices.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes recent advances in the field of automated surveillance of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), with a focus on data sources and the development of semiautomated or fully automated algorithms. RECENT FINDINGS: The availability of high-quality data in electronic health records and a well-designed information technology (IT) infrastructure to access these data are indispensable for successful implementation of automated HAI surveillance. Previous studies have demonstrated that reliance on stand-alone administrative data is generally unsuited as sole case-finding strategy. Recent attempts to combine multiple administrative and clinical data sources in algorithms yielded more reliable results. Current surveillance practices are mostly limited to single healthcare facilities, but future linkage of multiple databases in a network may allow interfacility surveillance. Although prior surveillance algorithms were often straightforward decision trees based on structured data, recent studies have used a wide variety of techniques for case-finding, including logistic regression and various machine learning methods. In the future, natural language processing may enable the use of unstructured narrative data. SUMMARY: Developments in healthcare IT are rapidly changing the landscape of HAI surveillance. The electronic availability and incorporation of routine care data in surveillance algorithms enhances the reliability, efficiency and standardization of surveillance practices.
Authors: Erica S Shenoy; Eric S Rosenthal; Yu-Ping Shao; Siddharth Biswal; Manohar Ghanta; Erin E Ryan; Dolores Suslak; Nancy Swanson; Valdery Moura Junior; David C Hooper; M Brandon Westover Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2018-05-17 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Robert Garcia; Sue Barnes; Roy Boukidjian; Linda Kaye Goss; Maureen Spencer; Edward J Septimus; Marc-Oliver Wright; Shannon Munro; Sara M Reese; Mohamad G Fakih; Charles E Edmiston; Martin Levesque Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2022-05-04 Impact factor: 4.303
Authors: John Karlsson Valik; Logan Ward; Hideyuki Tanushi; Kajsa Müllersdorf; Anders Ternhag; Ewa Aufwerber; Anna Färnert; Anders F Johansson; Mads Lause Mogensen; Brian Pickering; Hercules Dalianis; Aron Henriksson; Vitaly Herasevich; Pontus Nauclér Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Beatriz Villamarín-Bello; Berta Uriel-Latorre; Florentino Fdez-Riverola; María Sande-Meijide; Daniel Glez-Peña Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2019-09-23 Impact factor: 3.411