Literature DB >> 28504218

First-in-human evaluation of a novel poly-L-lactide based sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold for the treatment of de novo native coronary artery lesions: MeRes-1 trial.

Ashok Seth1, Yoshinobu Onuma, Ricardo Costa, Praveen Chandra, Vinay K Bahl, Cholenahally N Manjunath, Ajaykumar U Mahajan, Viveka Kumar, Pravin K Goel, Gurpreet S Wander, Mathew S Kalarickal, Upendra Kaul, V K Ajit Kumar, Pratap C Rath, Vijay Trehan, Gunasekaran Sengottuvelu, Sundeep Mishra, Alexandre Abizaid, Patrick W Serruys.   

Abstract

AIMS: The MeRes-1 trial sought to study the safety and effectiveness of a novel sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold (MeRes100 BRS) in treating de novo native coronary artery lesions by clinical evaluation and using multiple imaging modalities. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The MeRes-1 first-in-human trial was a single-arm, prospective, multicentre study, which enrolled 108 patients with de novo coronary artery lesions (116 scaffolds were deployed to treat 116 lesions in 108 patients). At six months, quantitative coronary angiography revealed in-scaffold late lumen loss of 0.15±0.23 mm with 0% binary restenosis. Optical coherence tomography demonstrated minimum scaffold area (6.86±1.73 mm2) and percentage neointimal strut coverage (99.30%). Quantitative intravascular ultrasound analysis confirmed a 0.14±0.16 mm2 neointimal hyperplasia area. At one year, major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, any myocardial infarction and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation, occurred in only one patient (0.93%) and there was no scaffold thrombosis reported. At one year, computed tomography angiography demonstrated that all scaffolds were patent and in-scaffold mean percentage area stenosis was 11.33±26.57%.
CONCLUSIONS: The MeRes-1 trial demonstrated the safety and effectiveness of MeRes100 BRS. The favourable clinical outcomes and effective vascular responses have provided the basis for further studies in a larger patient population. The MeRes-1 trial is registered at the Clinical Trials Registry-India.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28504218     DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EuroIntervention        ISSN: 1774-024X            Impact factor:   6.534


  9 in total

1.  Two-year longitudinal evaluation of a second-generation thin-strut sirolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold with hybrid cell design in porcine coronary arteries.

Authors:  Pawel Gasior; Yanping Cheng; Jinggang Xia; Gerard B Conditt; Jennifer C McGregor; Renu Virmani; Juan F Granada; Grzegorz L Kaluza
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 2.  Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds: Deployment Tips and Tricks and the Future of the Technology.

Authors:  J Ribamar Costa; Alexandre Abizaid
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

Review 3.  Optical coherence tomography guidance during bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation.

Authors:  Gioel Gabrio Secco; Monica Verdoia; Gianfranco Pistis; Giuseppe De Luca; Matteo Vercellino; Andrea Audo; Rosario Parisi; Maurizio Reale; Giorgio Ballestrero; Paolo Nicola Marino; Carlo Di Mario
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Bioresorbable Scaffolds in Coronary Intervention: Unmet Needs and Evolution.

Authors:  Davide Capodanno
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.243

5.  Pharmacokinetic Study of Sirolimus-Eluting BioResorbable Vascular Scaffold System for Treatment of De Novo Native Coronary Lesions: A Sub-Study of MeRes-1 Trial.

Authors:  Praveen Chandra; Ajaykumar U Mahajan; Vipin D Bulani; Ashok S Thakkar
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2018-12-07

6.  Two-stage degradation and novel functional endothelium characteristics of a 3-D printed bioresorbable scaffold.

Authors:  Tieying Yin; Ruolin Du; Yang Wang; Junyang Huang; Shuang Ge; Yuhua Huang; Youhua Tan; Qing Liu; Zhong Chen; Hanqing Feng; Jie Du; Yazhou Wang; Guixue Wang
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-08-24

7.  Coronary bioresorbable stents: Non-invasive quantitative evaluation of intra- and juxta-stent plaque composition-A computed tomography longitudinal study.

Authors:  Evguenia Zdanovich; Samer Mansour; Louis-Mathieu Stevens; Charbel Naim; Daniel Juneau; Alexandre Semionov; Carl Chartrand-Lefebvre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 8.  Mid-term outcomes of the Absorb BVS versus second-generation DES: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cordula M Felix; Victor J van den Berg; Sanne E Hoeks; Jiang Ming Fam; Mattie Lenzen; Eric Boersma; Peter C Smits; Patrick W Serruys; Yoshinobu Onuma; Robert Jan M van Geuns
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mid-term outcomes of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds vs second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndromes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Junsong Ke; Hongyu Zhang; Jun Huang; Ping Lv; Jumei Yan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.889

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.