Literature DB >> 28503812

The difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children.

Zhong Lin1, Balamurali Vasudevan2, Kenneth J Ciuffreda3, Hong Jia Zhou1, Guang Yun Mao1,4, Ning Li Wang5, Yuan Bo Liang1,6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the difference between cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic autorefraction and its association with the progression of refractive error in Beijing urban children.
METHODS: A total of 386 children aged 6-17 years were enrolled in the baseline investigation of the Beijing Myopia Progression Study in 2010. They were invited for follow-up vision examinations in the years 2011, 2012, and 2013, including cycloplegic (cyclopentolate 1%, three times) autorefraction. We investigated the difference between the cycloplegic spherical equivalent (SE) and the non-cycloplegic SE (DSE) provided by autorefraction and its association with refractive error progression. The progression of refractive error was defined as the difference between the cycloplegic SE at follow-up and at baseline.
RESULTS: Two hundred and nineteen children (57%) with completed refractive data (mean ± standard deviation: -1.36 ± 2.44 D at baseline) were ultimately enrolled. The DSE reduced from 0.51 ± 0.72 D at baseline to 0.19 ± 0.43 D in the third year of follow-up (p = 0.01). The baseline DSE was positively associated with the children's baseline cycloplegic refraction (β = 0.193 dioptre dioptre-1 , p < 0.001). After further divided by refractive status, the DSE was consistently higher in the hyperopic group than in either the emmetropic or myopic groups at each follow-up (all p < 0.001). In the multivariate regression analysis, the myopic children with larger baseline DSE (β = -0.404 dioptre dioptre-1 , p = 0.01) exhibited more myopic refractive change. However, baseline DSE was not found to be a significant risk factor (relative risk, 95% confidence interval: 1.06, 0.79-1.41) for those with newly developed myopia.
CONCLUSION: In this sample, the children's DSE was found to be increased as the hyperopic refraction increased. Furthermore, greater the DSE was associated with the progression of refractive error among the myopic children, but not with the onset of myopia.
© 2017 The Authors Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics © 2017 The College of Optometrists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accommodation; hyperopia; myopia; refractive error; refractive progression

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28503812     DOI: 10.1111/opo.12381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  5 in total

1.  Lag of accommodation predicts clinically significant change of spherical equivalents after cycloplegia.

Authors:  Cheng-Cheng Jin; Ru-Xia Pei; Bei Du; Gui-Hua Liu; Nan Jin; Lin Liu; Rui-Hua Wei
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  The effect of atropine 0.01% eyedrops on relative peripheral refraction in myopic children.

Authors:  Jiaxin Tian; Shifei Wei; Shiming Li; Wenzai An; Weiling Bai; Xintong Liang; Jialing Du; Ningli Wang
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 4.456

3.  Changes in the anterior segment after cycloplegia with a biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Tomoaki Higashiyama; Maki Iwasa; Masahito Ohji
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  A review on the epidemiology of myopia in school children worldwide.

Authors:  Andrzej Grzybowski; Piotr Kanclerz; Kazuo Tsubota; Carla Lanca; Seang-Mei Saw
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  The Influence of 0.5% Tropicamide on Anterior Segment Parameters With CASIA2 in Emmetropic, Myopic, and Hyperopic Eyes.

Authors:  Feng Lin; Yuliang Wang; Yujia Liu; Xiaomei Qu; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 4.755

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.