Literature DB >> 28503743

Benchmarking the research track record and level of appointment of Australian occupational therapy academics.

Kieran Broome1,2, Marion Gray3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Academic faculty are active contributors to the evidence base of the profession. Little is known about the research productivity of Australian occupational therapy academics.
METHODS: A bibliographic analysis of Australian occupational therapy faculty websites and corresponding Scopus citation database profiles was conducted. A description of current research productivity benchmarks and relationships with holding a doctorate, academic appointment level and institutional characteristics were explored.
RESULTS: The median H-index of Clinical and Associate Lecturers was 0, 1 for Lecturers, 4 for Senior Lecturers, 7.5 for Associate Professors and 13 for Professors. The number of publications and number of citing documents follows a Pareto tendency, where 20% of researchers are responsible for around 80% of the research track record of Australian occupational therapy academics.
CONCLUSION: The findings provide a benchmark for Australian occupational therapy faculty research track records and associations with appointment levels. This benchmark differs across countries and disciplines. The results raise considerations for enhancing the overall research track record of occupational therapy academics.
© 2017 Occupational Therapy Australia.

Keywords:  bibliometrics; occupational therapy; universities

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28503743     DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Occup Ther J        ISSN: 0045-0766            Impact factor:   1.856


  1 in total

1.  Benchmarking the research track record and level of appointment of Australian medical laboratory science academics.

Authors:  Rebecca Donkin; Kieran Broome; Libby Swanepoel
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.