Ala Yaromina1, Marlies Granzier2, Rianne Biemans2, Natasja Lieuwes2, Wouter van Elmpt2, Georgy Shakirin3, Ludwig Dubois2, Philippe Lambin2. 1. Dept. of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. Electronic address: ala.yaromina@maastrichtuniversity.nl. 2. Dept. of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, The Netherlands. 3. Philips GmbH, Innovative Technologies, Aachen, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We tested a novel treatment approach combining (1) targeting radioresistant hypoxic tumour cells with the hypoxia-activated prodrug TH-302 and (2) inverse radiation dose-painting to boost selectively non-hypoxic tumour sub-volumes having no/low drug uptake. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 18F-HX4 hypoxia tracer uptake measured with a clinical PET/CT scanner was used as a surrogate of TH-302 activity in rhabdomyosarcomas growing in immunocompetent rats. Low or high drug uptake volume (LDUV/HDUV) was defined as 40% of the GTV with the lowest or highest 18F-HX4 uptake, respectively. Two hours post TH-302/saline administration, animals received either single dose radiotherapy (RT) uniformly (15 or 18.5Gy) or a dose-painted non-uniform radiation (15Gy) with 50% higher dose to LDUV or HDUV (18.5Gy). Treatment plans were created using Eclipse treatment planning system and radiation was delivered using VMAT. Tumour response was quantified as time to reach 3 times starting tumour volume. RESULTS: Non-uniform RT boosting tumour sub-volume with low TH-302 uptake (LDUV) was superior to the same dose escalation to HDUV (p<0.0001) and uniform RT with the same mean dose 15Gy (p=0.0077). Noteworthy, dose escalation to LDUV required on average 3.5Gy lower dose to the GTV to achieve similar tumour response as uniform dose escalation. CONCLUSIONS: The results support targeted dose escalation to non-hypoxic tumour sub-volume with no/low activity of hypoxia-activated prodrugs. This strategy applies on average a lower radiation dose and is as effective as uniform dose escalation to the entire tumour. It could be applied to other type of drugs provided that their distribution can be imaged.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We tested a novel treatment approach combining (1) targeting radioresistant hypoxic tumour cells with the hypoxia-activated prodrug TH-302 and (2) inverse radiation dose-painting to boost selectively non-hypoxic tumour sub-volumes having no/low drug uptake. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 18F-HX4 hypoxia tracer uptake measured with a clinical PET/CT scanner was used as a surrogate of TH-302 activity in rhabdomyosarcomas growing in immunocompetent rats. Low or high drug uptake volume (LDUV/HDUV) was defined as 40% of the GTV with the lowest or highest 18F-HX4 uptake, respectively. Two hours post TH-302/saline administration, animals received either single dose radiotherapy (RT) uniformly (15 or 18.5Gy) or a dose-painted non-uniform radiation (15Gy) with 50% higher dose to LDUV or HDUV (18.5Gy). Treatment plans were created using Eclipse treatment planning system and radiation was delivered using VMAT. Tumour response was quantified as time to reach 3 times starting tumour volume. RESULTS: Non-uniform RT boosting tumour sub-volume with low TH-302 uptake (LDUV) was superior to the same dose escalation to HDUV (p<0.0001) and uniform RT with the same mean dose 15Gy (p=0.0077). Noteworthy, dose escalation to LDUV required on average 3.5Gy lower dose to the GTV to achieve similar tumour response as uniform dose escalation. CONCLUSIONS: The results support targeted dose escalation to non-hypoxic tumour sub-volume with no/low activity of hypoxia-activated prodrugs. This strategy applies on average a lower radiation dose and is as effective as uniform dose escalation to the entire tumour. It could be applied to other type of drugs provided that their distribution can be imaged.
Authors: Linda Spiegelberg; Ruud Houben; Raymon Niemans; Dirk de Ruysscher; Ala Yaromina; Jan Theys; Christopher P Guise; Jeffrey B Smaill; Adam V Patterson; Philippe Lambin; Ludwig J Dubois Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2019-01-18
Authors: Franziska Eckert; Kerstin Zwirner; Simon Boeke; Daniela Thorwarth; Daniel Zips; Stephan M Huber Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2019-03-12 Impact factor: 7.561
Authors: Linda Spiegelberg; Stefan J van Hoof; Rianne Biemans; Natasja G Lieuwes; Damiënne Marcus; Raymon Niemans; Jan Theys; Ala Yaromina; Philippe Lambin; Frank Verhaegen; Ludwig J Dubois Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2019-08-17 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Alexander M A van der Wiel; Lesley Schuitmaker; Ying Cong; Jan Theys; Arne Van Hoeck; Conchita Vens; Philippe Lambin; Ala Yaromina; Ludwig J Dubois Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-08-27 Impact factor: 6.575