Literature DB >> 28502405

A practical guidance for assessments of sedentary behavior at work: A PEROSH initiative.

Andreas Holtermann1, Vera Schellewald2, Svend Erik Mathiassen3, Nidhi Gupta4, Andrew Pinder5, Anne Punakallio6, Kaj Bo Veiersted7, Britta Weber8, Esa-Pekka Takala6, Francesco Draicchio9, Henrik Enquist10, Kevin Desbrosses11, Maria Peñahora García Sanz12, Marzena Malińska13, María Villar12, Michael Wichtl14, Michaela Strebl14, Mikael Forsman15, Sirpa Lusa6, Tomasz Tokarski13, Peter Hendriksen4, Rolf Ellegast8.   

Abstract

Sedentary behavior is defined as sitting or lying with low energy expenditure. Humans in industrialized societies spend an increasing amount of time in sedentary behaviors every day. This has been associated with detrimental health outcomes. Despite a growing interest in the health effects of sedentary behavior at work, associations remain unclear, plausibly due to poor and diverse methods for assessing sedentary behavior. Thus, good practice guidance for researchers and practitioners on how to assess occupational sedentary behavior are needed. The aim of this paper is to provide a practical guidance for practitioners and researchers on how to assess occupational sedentary behavior. Ambulatory systems for use in field applications (wearables) are a promising approach for sedentary behavior assessment. Many different small-size consumer wearables, with long battery life and high data storage capacity are commercially available today. However, no stand-alone commercial system is able to assess sedentary behavior in accordance with its definition. The present paper offers decision support for practitioners and researchers in selecting wearables and data collection strategies for their purpose of study on sedentary behavior. Valid and reliable assessment of occupational sedentary behavior is currently not easy. Several aspects need to be considered in the decision process on how to assess sedentary behavior. There is a need for development of a cheap and easily useable wearable for assessment of occupational sedentary behavior by researchers and practitioners.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Guideline; Measurements; Sedentary work; Sitting; Technical; Wearables

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28502405     DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Ergon        ISSN: 0003-6870            Impact factor:   3.661


  6 in total

1.  Sedentary behavior moderates the relationship between physical activity and cardiometabolic risk in young Latino children.

Authors:  Jamil A Malik; Jennifer Coto; Elizabeth R Pulgaron; Amber Daigre; Janine E Sanchez; Ronald B Goldberg; Dawn K Wilson; Alan M Delamater
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Assessing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior under Free-Living Conditions: Comparison of Active Style Pro HJA-350IT and ActiGraphTM GT3X.

Authors:  Shohei Yano; Mohammad Javad Koohsari; Ai Shibata; Kaori Ishii; Suzanne Mavoa; Koichiro Oka
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Concurrent and discriminant validity of ActiGraph waist and wrist cut-points to measure sedentary behaviour, activity level, and posture in office work.

Authors:  Roman P Kuster; Maria Hagströmer; Daniel Baumgartner; Wilhelmus J A Grooten
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Is Sitting Always Inactive and Standing Always Active? A Simultaneous Free-Living activPal and ActiGraph Analysis.

Authors:  Roman P Kuster; Wilhelmus J A Grooten; Victoria Blom; Daniel Baumgartner; Maria Hagströmer; Örjan Ekblom
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Validity of Three Survey Questions for Self-Assessed Sedentary Time.

Authors:  Viktoria Wahlström; Mikael Nygren; David Olsson; Frida Bergman; Charlotte Lewis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  A comparison of standard and compositional data analysis in studies addressing group differences in sedentary behavior and physical activity.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Glòria Mateu-Figueras; Marina Heiden; David M Hallman; Marie Birk Jørgensen; Andreas Holtermann
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 6.457

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.