Literature DB >> 28501581

Longer Observation Time Increases Proportion of Neoplasms Detected by Esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Jae Myung Park1, Sol Mi Huo2, Han Hee Lee2, Bo-In Lee2, Ho Jin Song3, Myung-Gyu Choi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is commonly used to detect upper gastrointestinal (GI) neoplasms. However, there is little evidence that longer examination time increases rate of detection of upper GI neoplasia. We investigated the association between length of time spent performing a normal screening EGD and rate of neoplasm detection.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 111,962 subjects who underwent EGD as part of a comprehensive health-screening program from January 2009 to December 2015 in Korea. Endoscopy findings were extracted from reports prepared by 14 board-certified endoscopists. Endoscopists were classified as fast or slow based on their mean examination time for a normal EGD without biopsy during their first year of the study. All endoscopists used the same endoscopy unit. We obtained findings from histologic analyses of GI biopsies from patient records; positive findings were defined as the detection of neoplasms (esophageal, gastric, or duodenal lesions). We examined the association between examination time and proportions of neoplasms detected. The primary outcome measure was the rate of neoplasm detection for each endoscopist (total number of neoplastic lesions detected divided by the number of subjects screened) and as the proportion of subjects with at least 1 neoplastic lesion.
RESULTS: The mean examination time was 2 minutes 53 seconds. Using 3 minutes as a cutoff, we classified 8 endoscopists as fast (mean duration, 2:38 ± 0:21 minutes) and 6 endoscopists as slow (mean duration, 3:25 ± 0:19 minutes). Each endoscopist's mean examination time correlated with their rate of neoplasm detection (R2 = 0.54; P = .046). Fast endoscopists identified neoplasms in the upper GI tract in 0.20% of patients, whereas slow endoscopists identified these in 0.28% of patients (P = .0054). The frequency of endoscopic biopsy varied among endoscopists (range, 6.9%-27.8%) and correlated with rate of neoplasm detection (R2 = 0.76; P = .0015). On multivariable analysis, slow endoscopists were more likely to detect gastric adenomas or carcinomas than fast endoscopists (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.17-1.97).
CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective analysis of data from more than 100,000 subjects who underwent EGD in a screening program, we found slow endoscopists detected a higher proportion of neoplasms than fast endoscopists. Examination time is therefore a useful indicator of quality for EGD.
Copyright © 2017 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagus; Quality indicators; Stomach; Tumor

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28501581     DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  25 in total

1.  Screening endoscopy for gastric cancer: time for quality control.

Authors:  Eun Hye Kim; Chan Hyuk Park
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-09-27

2.  Quality standards and performance measures: steps to high quality diagnostic endoscopy.

Authors:  Yu Kyung Cho
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-01-28

Review 3.  AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Atrophic Gastritis: Expert Review.

Authors:  Shailja C Shah; M Blanca Piazuelo; Ernst J Kuipers; Dan Li
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 33.883

Review 4.  Quality indicators in esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Authors:  Sang Yoon Kim; Jae Myung Park
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2022-05-16

5.  Assigning a different endoscopist for each annual follow-up may contribute to improved gastric cancer detection rates.

Authors:  Shuhei Unno; Kimihiro Igarashi; Hiroaki Saito; Dai Hirasawa; Toru Okuzono; Yukari Tanaka; Masato Nakahori; Tomoki Matsuda
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-10-17

6.  Three-year interval for endoscopic screening may reduce the mortality in patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Sang Il Choi; Boram Park; Jungnam Joo; Young-Il Kim; Jong Yeul Lee; Chan Gyoo Kim; Il Ju Choi; Myeong-Cherl Kook; Soo-Jeong Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Rates and Risk Factors for Interval Gastric Cancers at Screening Gastroscopy.

Authors:  Jin Hwa Park; Kang Nyeong Lee; Hang Lak Lee; Dae Won Jun; Jai Hoon Yoon; Oh Young Lee; Byung Chul Yoon; Ho Soon Choi
Journal:  Turk J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.852

8.  Identification of gaze pattern and blind spots by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using an eye-tracking technique.

Authors:  Ayoung Lee; Hyunsoo Chung; Yejin Cho; Jue Lie Kim; Jinju Choi; Eunwoo Lee; Bokyung Kim; Soo-Jeong Cho; Sang Gyun Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Composite detection rate as an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy quality measure correlating with detection of neoplasia.

Authors:  Marcin Romańczyk; Bartosz Ostrowski; Tomasz Marek; Tomasz Romańczyk; Małgorzata Błaszczyńska; Krzysztof Budzyń; Maciej Bugajski; Mateusz Koziej; Maciej Kajor; Krzysztof Januszewski; Wojciech Zajęcki; Marek Waluga; Marek Hartleb
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-02       Impact factor: 6.772

10.  Increased incidence of metachronous gastric neoplasm after endoscopic resection in patients with synchronous gastric neoplasm.

Authors:  Ga-Yeong Shin; Hye Jin Cho; Jae Myung Park; Chul-Hyun Lim; Yu Kyung Cho; Myung-Gyu Choi
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.