Literature DB >> 28501547

Drawn together: When motor representations ground joint actions.

Francesco Della Gatta1, Francesca Garbarini2, Marco Rabuffetti3, Luca Viganò1, Stephen A Butterfill4, Corrado Sinigaglia5.   

Abstract

What enables individuals to act together? Recent discoveries suggest that a variety of mechanisms are involved. But something fundamental is yet to be investigated. In joint action, agents represent a collective goal, or so it is often assumed. But how, if at all, are collective goals represented in joint action and how do such representations impact performance? To investigate this question we adapted a bimanual paradigm, the circle-line drawing paradigm, to contrast two agents acting in parallel with two agents performing a joint action. Participants were required to draw lines or circles while observing circles or lines being drawn. The findings indicate that interpersonal motor coupling may occur in joint but not parallel action. This suggests that participants in joint actions can represent collective goals motorically.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Collective goal; Interpersonal coupling; Joint action; Motor representation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28501547     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.04.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  11 in total

1.  Bimanual joint action: correlated timing or "bimanual" movements accomplished by two people.

Authors:  Melanie Y Lam; Jarrod Blinch; Elizabeth M Connors; Jon B Doan; Claudia L R Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The sense of agency in joint action: An integrative review.

Authors:  Janeen D Loehr
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2022-02-10

3.  What's Shared in Movement Kinematics: Investigating Co-representation of Actions Through Movement.

Authors:  Matilde Rocca; Andrea Cavallo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-08-28

4.  Social Motor Priming: when offline interference facilitates motor execution.

Authors:  Sonia Betti; Eris Chinellato; Silvia Guerra; Umberto Castiello; Luisa Sartori
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Evidence for we-representations during joint action planning.

Authors:  Dimitrios Kourtis; Mateusz Woźniak; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Bimanual coupling effect during a proprioceptive stimulation.

Authors:  M Biggio; A Bisio; F Garbarini; Marco Bove
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Joint control of visually guided actions involves concordant increases in behavioural and neural coupling.

Authors:  David R Painter; Jeffrey J Kim; Angela I Renton; Jason B Mattingley
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-29

Review 8.  Interactive Brain Activity: Review and Progress on EEG-Based Hyperscanning in Social Interactions.

Authors:  Difei Liu; Shen Liu; Xiaoming Liu; Chong Zhang; Aosika Li; Chenggong Jin; Yijun Chen; Hangwei Wang; Xiaochu Zhang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-08

9.  Co-actors represent the order of each other's actions.

Authors:  Laura Schmitz; Cordula Vesper; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-08-22

10.  Joint action goals reduce visuomotor interference effects from a partner's incongruent actions.

Authors:  Sam Clarke; Luke McEllin; Anna Francová; Marcell Székely; Stephen A Butterfill; John Michael
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.