Literature DB >> 28501481

Effect of Lymphadenectomy During Radical Nephroureterectomy in Locally Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

Masaomi Ikeda1, Kazumasa Matsumoto2, Kazushige Sakaguchi3, Daisuke Ishii2, Ken-Ichi Tabata2, Kazuhiro Kurosawa3, Shinji Urakami3, Toshikazu Okaneya3, Masatsugu Iwamura2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of lymph node dissection (LND) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of LND on clinical outcomes during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and to determine prognostic factors of survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1985 to 2013, 404 patients with UTUC underwent RNU; 5 patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Among them, 182 (46%) were pathologically negative for lymph node metastasis (pN0), 177 (44%) were non-LND (pNx), and 40 (10%) were positive for lymph nodes metastasis (pN1/2).
RESULTS: The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate were higher in pN0 patients than in pNx patients and in pN1/2 patients. According to multivariate analysis, non-LND was an independent predictive factor of DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91; P = .004) and CSS (HR, 2.28; P = .003). In the subgroup with muscle-invasive UTUC, the 5-year DFS and CSS rates were higher in pN0 patients than in pNx patients. However, there was no statistical difference between pN0 and pNx groups in terms of DFS and CSS in the pT2 cases. DFS and CSS times were significantly prolonged in the pN0 group in the locally advanced UTUC patients (≥pT3).
CONCLUSION: In the ≥pT3 subgroup, the 5-year DFS and CSS were significantly prolonged in the pN0 group, but there were no statistical differences between pN0 and pNx groups in terms of DFS and CSS in the pT2 subgroup. LND for patients with locally advanced UTUC might improve disease prognosis.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical outcome; Lymph node dissection; Prognosis; UTUC

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28501481     DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer        ISSN: 1558-7673            Impact factor:   2.872


  6 in total

Review 1.  Lymph node dissection for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A systematic review.

Authors:  Vinson Wai-Shun Chan; Chris Ho Ming Wong; Yuhong Yuan; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2020-07-27

Review 2.  Lymphadenectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Igor Duquesne; Idir Ouzaid; Yohann Loriot; Marco Moschini; Evanguelos Xylinas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 3.  Lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy: Establishing the existing evidence based on a review of the literature.

Authors:  Nathan Grimes; Alastair McKay; Su-Min Lee; Omar M Aboumarzouk
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2019-04-24

Review 4.  The nephroureterectomy: a review of technique and current controversies.

Authors:  Gregory J Barton; Wei Phin Tan; Brant A Inman
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-12

Review 5.  Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Nephro-Ureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Review.

Authors:  Arthur Peyrottes; Gianluigi Califano; Idir Ouzaïd; Paul Lainé-Caroff; Thibaut Long Depaquit; Jean-François Hermieu; Evanguelos Xylinas
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24

6.  Effect of lymph node dissection on stage-specific survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy.

Authors:  Ting-Shuai Zhai; Liang Jin; Zhen Zhou; Xiang Liu; Huan Liu; Wei Chen; Jing-Yi Lu; Xu-Dong Yao; Li-Ming Feng; Lin Ye
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.