Vivian X Zhou1, Macarena Lolas1, Tammy T Chang2. 1. Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 2. Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Liver Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. Electronic address: tammy.chang@ucsf.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Liver organoids show potential for development as a tissue replacement therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, but efficient methods for introducing organoids into host livers have not been established. In this study, we aimed to develop a surgical technique to implant hepatic organoids into the liver and assess their engraftment. METHODS: Donor hepatocytes were isolated from ROSA26 C57BL/6 mice, so that engrafted cells, when implanted into wild-type mice, could be easily identified by X-gal staining. Hepatic organoids were generated by three-dimensional culture in rotating wall vessel bioreactors. We qualitatively and quantitatively compared organoid engraftment to that of single-cell hepatocyte transplants. In addition, we determined the effect of adding stellate cells to hepatocytes to form co-aggregated organoids and the effect of partial hepatectomy of the host liver on organoid engraftment. RESULTS: Direct orthotopic implantation of hepatic organoids within a hepatotomy site resulted in local engraftment of exogenous hepatocytes with limited durability. Hepatocyte-stellate cell organoids produced more extracellular matrix but did not significantly improve engraftment compared with hepatocyte-alone organoids. Partial hepatectomy of the host liver led to significantly decreased engraftment of organoids. Survival of organoids was limited by the presence of apoptotic hepatocytes within organoids as early as 1 h after implantation. Organoids eventually became necrotic and elicited a chronic inflammatory giant cell reaction similar to a foreign body response. CONCLUSIONS: With additional organoid and host factor optimization, direct orthotopic implantation of hepatic organoids may be an approach to introduce large numbers of exogenous hepatocytes into recipient livers.
BACKGROUND: Liver organoids show potential for development as a tissue replacement therapy for patients with end-stage liver disease, but efficient methods for introducing organoids into host livers have not been established. In this study, we aimed to develop a surgical technique to implant hepatic organoids into the liver and assess their engraftment. METHODS:Donor hepatocytes were isolated from ROSA26 C57BL/6 mice, so that engrafted cells, when implanted into wild-type mice, could be easily identified by X-gal staining. Hepatic organoids were generated by three-dimensional culture in rotating wall vessel bioreactors. We qualitatively and quantitatively compared organoid engraftment to that of single-cell hepatocyte transplants. In addition, we determined the effect of adding stellate cells to hepatocytes to form co-aggregated organoids and the effect of partial hepatectomy of the host liver on organoid engraftment. RESULTS: Direct orthotopic implantation of hepatic organoids within a hepatotomy site resulted in local engraftment of exogenous hepatocytes with limited durability. Hepatocyte-stellate cell organoids produced more extracellular matrix but did not significantly improve engraftment compared with hepatocyte-alone organoids. Partial hepatectomy of the host liver led to significantly decreased engraftment of organoids. Survival of organoids was limited by the presence of apoptotic hepatocytes within organoids as early as 1 h after implantation. Organoids eventually became necrotic and elicited a chronic inflammatory giant cell reaction similar to a foreign body response. CONCLUSIONS: With additional organoid and host factor optimization, direct orthotopic implantation of hepatic organoids may be an approach to introduce large numbers of exogenous hepatocytes into recipient livers.
Authors: Jennifer Barrila; Andrea L Radtke; Aurélie Crabbé; Shameema F Sarker; Melissa M Herbst-Kralovetz; C Mark Ott; Cheryl A Nickerson Journal: Nat Rev Microbiol Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 60.633
Authors: Sau Fung Wong; Da Yoon No; Yoon Young Choi; Dong Sik Kim; Bong Geun Chung; Sang-Hoon Lee Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Meritxell Huch; Helmuth Gehart; Ruben van Boxtel; Karien Hamer; Francis Blokzijl; Monique M A Verstegen; Ewa Ellis; Martien van Wenum; Sabine A Fuchs; Joep de Ligt; Marc van de Wetering; Nobuo Sasaki; Susanne J Boers; Hans Kemperman; Jeroen de Jonge; Jan N M Ijzermans; Edward E S Nieuwenhuis; Ruurdtje Hoekstra; Stephen Strom; Robert R G Vries; Luc J W van der Laan; Edwin Cuppen; Hans Clevers Journal: Cell Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 41.582