Literature DB >> 28501121

Validation of a field spinal motion restriction protocol in a level I trauma center.

James M Tatum1, Nicolas Melo1, Ara Ko1, Navpreet K Dhillon1, Eric J T Smith1, Dorothy A Yim1, Galinos Barmparas1, Eric J Ley2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Spinal motion restriction (SMR) after traumatic injury has been a mainstay of prehospital trauma care for more than 3 decades. Recent guidelines recommend a selective approach with cervical spine clearance in the field when criteria are met.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In January 2014, the Department of Health Services of the City of Los Angeles, California, implemented revised guidelines for cervical SMR after blunt mechanism trauma. Adult patients (aged ≥18 y) with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of ≥13 presented to a single level I trauma center after blunt mechanism trauma over the following 1-y period were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, injury data, and prehospital data were collected. Cervical spine injury (CSI) was identified by International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, codes.
RESULTS: Emergency medical services transported 1111 patients to the emergency department who sustained blunt trauma. Patients were excluded if they refused c-collar placement or if documentation was incomplete. A total of 997 patients were included in our analysis with 172 (17.2%) who were selective cleared of SMR per protocol. The rate of Spinal Cord Injury was 2.2% (22/997) overall and 1.2% (2/172) in patients without SMR. The sensitivity and specificity of the protocol are 90.9% (95% confidence interval: 69.4-98.4) and 17.4% (95% confidence interval: 15.1-20.0), respectively, for CSI. Patients with CSI who arrived without immobilization having met field clearance guidelines, were managed without intervention, and had no neurologic compromise.
CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for cervical SMR have high sensitivity and low specificity to identify CSI. When patients with injuries were not placed on motion restrictions, there were no negative clinical outcomes.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blunt trauma; Cervical spine clearance; Cervical spine injury; Prehospital cervical spine clearance; Spinal motion restriction

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28501121     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  4 in total

1.  Cervical Spine Injury in Burned Trauma Patients: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Laura A Galganski; Jessica A Cox; David G Greenhalgh; Soman Sen; Kathleen S Romanowski; Tina L Palmieri
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 1.845

2.  Chinese expert consensus on the treatment of modern combat-related spinal injuries.

Authors:  Zhao-Wen Zong; Hao Qin; Si-Xu Chen; Jia-Zhi Yang; Lei Yang; Lin Zhang; Wen-Qiong Du; Xin Zhong; Ren-Jie Zhou; Dan Tan; Hao Wu
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2019-02-20

Review 3.  Factors which affect the application and implementation of a spinal motion restriction protocol by prehospital providers in a low resource setting: A scoping review.

Authors:  Charlene Geduld; Henra Muller; Colleen J Saunders
Journal:  Afr J Emerg Med       Date:  2022-09-15

4.  Epidemiology and predictors of traumatic spine injury in severely injured patients: implications for emergency procedures.

Authors:  David Häske; Rolf Lefering; Jan-Philipp Stock; Michael Kreinest
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 2.374

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.