X-Q Xu1, W Qian1, G Ma1, H Hu1, G-Y Su1, H Liu2, H-B Shi1, F-Y Wu3. 1. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. 3. Department of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. Electronic address: wfy_njmu@163.com.
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the performance of the combination of diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating radiologically indeterminate malignant from benign orbital masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with orbital masses (36 benign and 29 malignant) underwent DW and DCE MRI examinations for pre-treatment evaluation. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was derived from DW imaging data using the mono-exponential model. The volume transfer constant (Ktrans), the flux rate constant between the extravascular extracellular space and the plasma (Kep), and the extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve) were calculated using modified Tofts model. Differences in quantitative metrics were tested using independent-samples t test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to determine and compare the diagnostic ability of each significant metric. RESULTS: The malignant group demonstrated significantly lower ADC (0.711±0.260 versus 1.187±0.389, p<0.001) and higher Kep values (1.265±0.637 versus 0.871±0.610, p=0.008) than the benign group. Optimal diagnostic performance (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.941; sensitivity, 0.966; specificity, 0.917) could be achieved using combined ADC and Kep values as the diagnostic index. The diagnostic performance of the combination of ADC and Kep was significantly better than Kep alone (p=0.006). Compared with ADC alone, combined ADC and Kep values also showed higher AUC (0.941 versus 0.898), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.220). CONCLUSION: Kep and ADC could help to differentiate radiologically indeterminate malignant from benign orbital masses. The combination of DW and DCE MRI might improve the differentiating performance.
AIM: To evaluate the performance of the combination of diffusion-weighted (DW) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating radiologically indeterminate malignant from benign orbital masses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with orbital masses (36 benign and 29 malignant) underwent DW and DCE MRI examinations for pre-treatment evaluation. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was derived from DW imaging data using the mono-exponential model. The volume transfer constant (Ktrans), the flux rate constant between the extravascular extracellular space and the plasma (Kep), and the extravascular extracellular volume fraction (Ve) were calculated using modified Tofts model. Differences in quantitative metrics were tested using independent-samples t test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were used to determine and compare the diagnostic ability of each significant metric. RESULTS: The malignant group demonstrated significantly lower ADC (0.711±0.260 versus 1.187±0.389, p<0.001) and higher Kep values (1.265±0.637 versus 0.871±0.610, p=0.008) than the benign group. Optimal diagnostic performance (area under the ROC curve [AUC], 0.941; sensitivity, 0.966; specificity, 0.917) could be achieved using combined ADC and Kep values as the diagnostic index. The diagnostic performance of the combination of ADC and Kep was significantly better than Kep alone (p=0.006). Compared with ADC alone, combined ADC and Kep values also showed higher AUC (0.941 versus 0.898), although the difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.220). CONCLUSION: Kep and ADC could help to differentiate radiologically indeterminate malignant from benign orbital masses. The combination of DW and DCE MRI might improve the differentiating performance.
Authors: Pietro Valerio Foti; Mario Travali; Renato Farina; Stefano Palmucci; Corrado Spatola; Luigi Raffaele; Vincenzo Salamone; Rosario Caltabiano; Giuseppe Broggi; Lidia Puzzo; Andrea Russo; Michele Reibaldi; Antonio Longo; Paolo Vigneri; Teresio Avitabile; Giovani Carlo Ettorre; Antonio Basile Journal: Insights Imaging Date: 2021-06-03