Literature DB >> 28500988

Comparison of Faradaic reactions in capacitive deionization (CDI) and membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) water treatment processes.

Wangwang Tang1, Di He2, Changyong Zhang1, Peter Kovalsky1, T David Waite3.   

Abstract

Capacitive deionization (CDI) and membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) are the most common cell architectures in the use of CDI for water treatment. In this work, the Faradaic reactions occurring in batch-mode CDI and MCDI processes were compared by investigating the variation of H2O2 and dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations, pH, conductivity and current during charging and discharging under different charging voltages. During charging, the H2O2 concentration in CDI increased rapidly and then decreased while almost no H2O2 was generated in MCDI due to the inability of oxygen to penetrate the ion exchange membrane. Chemical kinetic models were developed to quantitatively describe the variation of H2O2 concentration and found to present satisfactory descriptions of the experimental data. The pH drop during charging could be partially explained by Faradaic reactions with proton generation associated with oxidation of the carbon electrodes considered to be the major contributor. The electrode potentials required for the induction of Faradaic reactions were analyzed with this analysis providing robust thermodynamic explanations for the occurrence of carbon oxidation at the anode and H2O2 generation at the cathode during the ion adsorption process. Finally, electrochemically-induced ageing of the carbon electrodes and the resulting performance stability were investigated. The findings in this study contribute to a better understanding of Faradaic reactions in CDI and MCDI and should be of value in optimizing CDI-based technologies for particular practical applications.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capacitive deionization; Electrode potential; Faradaic reactions; Ion exchange membrane; Kinetic model

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28500988     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

Review 1.  Electrochemical Methods for Water Purification, Ion Separations, and Energy Conversion.

Authors:  Mohammad A Alkhadra; Xiao Su; Matthew E Suss; Huanhuan Tian; Eric N Guyes; Amit N Shocron; Kameron M Conforti; J Pedro de Souza; Nayeong Kim; Michele Tedesco; Khoiruddin Khoiruddin; I Gede Wenten; Juan G Santiago; T Alan Hatton; Martin Z Bazant
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 2.  Knowledge and Technology Used in Capacitive Deionization of Water.

Authors:  Kamran Salari; Payam Zarafshan; Morteza Khashehchi; Gholamreza Chegini; Hamed Etezadi; Hamed Karami; Joanna Szulżyk-Cieplak; Grzegorz Łagód
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-24

3.  Assembly of Soft Electrodes and Ion Exchange Membranes for Capacitive Deionization.

Authors:  Silvia Ahualli; Sergio Orozco-Barrera; María Del Mar Fernández; Ángel V Delgado; Guillermo R Iglesias
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 4.329

Review 4.  Recent Progresses in Adsorption Mechanism, Architectures, Electrode Materials and Applications for Advanced Electrosorption System: A Review.

Authors:  Youliang Cheng; Jiayu Shi; Qingling Zhang; Changqing Fang; Jing Chen; Fengjuan Li
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-23       Impact factor: 4.967

5.  Capacitive Deionization of Divalent Cations for Water Softening Using Functionalized Carbon Electrodes.

Authors:  Zhi Yi Leong; Hui Ying Yang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2020-01-28

Review 6.  Frontiers of Membrane Desalination Processes for Brackish Water Treatment: A Review.

Authors:  Soraya Honarparvar; Xin Zhang; Tianyu Chen; Ashkan Alborzi; Khurshida Afroz; Danny Reible
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.