Literature DB >> 28500880

Motor functioning differentially predicts mortality in men and women.

Marie Ernsth Bravell1, Deborah Finkel2, Anna Dahl Aslan3, Chandra A Reynolds4, Jenny Hallgren5, Nancy L Pedersen6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Research indicates gender differences in functional performance at advanced ages, but little is known about their impact on longevity for men and women.
OBJECTIVE: To derive a set of motor function factors from a battery of functional performance measures and examine their associations with mortality, incorporating possible gender interactions.
METHOD: Analyses were performed on the longitudinal Swedish Adoption/Twin Study of Aging (SATSA) including twenty-four assessments of motor function up to six times over a 19-year period. Three motor factors were derived from several factor analyses; fine motor, balance/upper strength, and flexibility. A latent growth curve model was used to capture longitudinal age changes in the motor factors and generated estimates of intercept at age 70 (I), rates of change before (S1) and after age 70 (S2) for each factor. Cox regression models were used to determine how gender in interaction with the motor factors was related to mortality.
RESULTS: Females demonstrated lower functional performance in all motor functions relative to men. Cox regression survival analyses demonstrated that both balance/upper strength, and fine motor function were significantly related to mortality. Gender specific analyses revealed that this was true for women only. For men, none of the motor factors were related to mortality.
CONCLUSION: Women demonstrated more difficulties in all functioning facets, and only among women were motor functioning (balance/upper strength and fine motor function) associated with mortality. These results provide evidence for the importance of considering motor functioning, and foremost observed gender differences when planning for individualized treatment and rehabilitation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender differences; Motor function; Survival

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28500880     DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2017.05.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0167-4943            Impact factor:   3.250


  4 in total

1.  Personality and health: Disentangling their between-person and within-person relationship in three longitudinal studies.

Authors:  Jing Luo; Bo Zhang; Ryne Estabrook; Eileen K Graham; Charles C Driver; Benjamin D Schalet; Nicholas A Turiano; Avron Spiro; Daniel K Mroczek
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2022-03

2.  Relationships and gender differences within and between assessments used in Swedish home rehabilitation - a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anette Johansson; Cristina Joy Torgé; Sofi Fristedt; Marie Ernsth Bravell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.908

3.  Physical functioning associated with life-space mobility in later life among men and women.

Authors:  Sofi Fristedt; Ann-Sofi Kammerlind; Eleonor I Fransson; Marie Ernsth Bravell
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.070

Review 4.  Predictive Validity of Motor Fitness and Flexibility Tests in Adults and Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nuria Marín-Jiménez; Carolina Cruz-León; Alejandro Perez-Bey; Julio Conde-Caveda; Alberto Grao-Cruces; Virginia A Aparicio; José Castro-Piñero; Magdalena Cuenca-García
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.