Hélio V Cabral1, Leonardo M L de Souza2, Roger G T Mello1,3, Alessio Gallina4, Liliam F de Oliveira1,2, Taian M Vieira5. 1. Programa de Engenharia Biomédica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Avenida Horácio Macedo 2030, Centro de Tecnologia, Bloco I, Sala I044C, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 2. Escola de Educação Física e Desportos, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 3. Departamento de Educação Física e Esportes, Escola Naval, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4. Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 5. Laboratorio di Ingegneria del Sistema Neuromuscolare (LISiN), Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italia.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Previous evidence suggests the fibers of different motor units reside within distinct vastus medialis (VM) regions. It remains unknown whether the activity of these motor units may be modulated differently. Herein we assess the discharge rate of motor units detected proximodistally from the VM to address this issue. METHODS: Surface electromyograms (EMGs) were recorded proximally and distally from the VM while 10 healthy subjects performed isometric contractions. Single motor units were decomposed from surface EMGs. The smoothed discharge rates of motor units identified from the same and from different VM regions were then cross-correlated. RESULTS: During low-level contractions, the discharge rate varied more similarly for distal (cross-correlation peak; interquartile interval: 0.27-0.40) and proximal (0.28-0.52) than for proximodistal pairs of VM motor units (0.20-0.33; P = 0.006). DISCUSSION: The discharge rates of motor units from different proximodistal VM regions show less similarity in their variations than those of pairs of units either distally or proximally. Muscle Nerve 57: 279-286, 2018.
INTRODUCTION: Previous evidence suggests the fibers of different motor units reside within distinct vastus medialis (VM) regions. It remains unknown whether the activity of these motor units may be modulated differently. Herein we assess the discharge rate of motor units detected proximodistally from the VM to address this issue. METHODS: Surface electromyograms (EMGs) were recorded proximally and distally from the VM while 10 healthy subjects performed isometric contractions. Single motor units were decomposed from surface EMGs. The smoothed discharge rates of motor units identified from the same and from different VM regions were then cross-correlated. RESULTS: During low-level contractions, the discharge rate varied more similarly for distal (cross-correlation peak; interquartile interval: 0.27-0.40) and proximal (0.28-0.52) than for proximodistal pairs of VM motor units (0.20-0.33; P = 0.006). DISCUSSION: The discharge rates of motor units from different proximodistal VM regions show less similarity in their variations than those of pairs of units either distally or proximally. Muscle Nerve 57: 279-286, 2018.
Authors: Marco Carbonaro; Kristen M Meiburger; Silvia Seoni; Emma F Hodson-Tole; Taian Vieira; Alberto Botter Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-05-25 Impact factor: 4.996