D Tomlinson1, L Tigelaar2, S Hyslop2, T Lazor2, L L Dupuis2,3, K Griener4, J Oliveria4, L Sung2,4. 1. Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, 686 Bay St, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada. deborah.tomlinson@sickkids.ca. 2. Child Health Evaluative Sciences, Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, 686 Bay St, Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada. 3. Department of Pharmacy, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada. 4. Division of Haematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5G 1X8, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study's objective was to summarize the psychometric evaluation of self-report symptom instruments used in children with cancer younger than 8 years of age. METHODS: We conducted electronic searches of Ovid Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Science Citation, Social Science Citation (Web of Science), and CINAHL. We included studies of children with cancer in which their self-report symptoms had been quantified and in which results were described for those younger than 8 years of age. The search was restricted to publications in English. Two reviewers screened studies and abstracted all data in duplicate. Descriptive analysis of reliability and validity was performed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. Only one study recruited children <8 years alone. Most studies described reliability and validity in a wider age range cohort in which most children were older than 8 years of age. Of the eight studies that evaluated reliability within the younger age group, six raised concerns about poor internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha <0.7 in at least one dimension. Concerns about test re-test reliability and inter-rater reliability were also observed. None of the studies evaluated validity. CONCLUSIONS: We failed to demonstrate that currently available instruments to measure self-report symptoms are reliable or valid specifically for children with cancer younger than 8 years of age. Development of psychometrically robust instruments for younger children should be a priority.
OBJECTIVE: The study's objective was to summarize the psychometric evaluation of self-report symptom instruments used in children with cancer younger than 8 years of age. METHODS: We conducted electronic searches of Ovid Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Science Citation, Social Science Citation (Web of Science), and CINAHL. We included studies of children with cancer in which their self-report symptoms had been quantified and in which results were described for those younger than 8 years of age. The search was restricted to publications in English. Two reviewers screened studies and abstracted all data in duplicate. Descriptive analysis of reliability and validity was performed. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included. Only one study recruited children <8 years alone. Most studies described reliability and validity in a wider age range cohort in which most children were older than 8 years of age. Of the eight studies that evaluated reliability within the younger age group, six raised concerns about poor internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha <0.7 in at least one dimension. Concerns about test re-test reliability and inter-rater reliability were also observed. None of the studies evaluated validity. CONCLUSIONS: We failed to demonstrate that currently available instruments to measure self-report symptoms are reliable or valid specifically for children with cancer younger than 8 years of age. Development of psychometrically robust instruments for younger children should be a priority.
Authors: Ana Paula Hermont; Ana Carolina Scarpelli; Saul M Paiva; Sheyla M Auad; Isabela A Pordeus Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2014-12-02 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Alison Twycross; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Catherine Vincent; Linda S Franck; Carl L von Baeyer Journal: Clin J Pain Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.442
Authors: Darren A DeWalt; Heather E Gross; Debbie S Gipson; David T Selewski; Esi Morgan DeWitt; Carlton D Dampier; Pamela S Hinds; I-Chan Huang; David Thissen; James W Varni Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2015-02-26 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: S Jacobs; C Baggott; R Agarwal; T Hesser; T Schechter; P Judd; D Tomlinson; J Beyene; L Sung Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-10-15 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Deborah Tomlinson; L Lee Dupuis; Donna L Johnston; Susan Kuczynski; Serina Patel; Tal Schechter; Emily Vettese; Mark Mairs; George A Tomlinson; Lillian Sung Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2022-07-04 Impact factor: 4.638
Authors: Anna Lewandowska; Barbara Zych; Katalin Papp; Dana Zrubcová; Helena Kadučáková; Mária Šupínová; Serap Ejder Apay; Małgorzata Nagórska Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2021-12-10