Bhavin B Adhyaru1, Terry A Jacobson2. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 49 Jesse Hill Jr Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA. badhyar@emory.edu. 2. Lipid Clinic and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Program, Department of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 49 Jesse Hill Jr Dr, Atlanta, GA, 30303, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol guidelines was a major paradigm shift in the management and treatment of dyslipidemia. The new guidelines outlined "statin benefit groups," highlighted weighing the benefit versus risks of statin therapy ("net benefit"), and discussed the importance of shared decision making between patients and providers in primary prevention. While there was widespread agreement on the main groups benefiting from statin therapy, there was significant controversy regarding LDL-C goals and thresholds, the role of non-statin therapy, and the use of statins in specific populations. The goal of this review is to understand the rationale for the updated 2016 ACC Expert Consensus on Non-Statins and to contrast it with the 2015 NLA Recommendations on the Management of Dyslipidemia. RECENT FINDINGS: The findings of the ACC Expert Consensus Panel were largely influenced by the results of several new clinical trials using non-statin therapy in combination with moderate to high intensity statin therapy. The IMPROVE-IT trial demonstrated that ezetimibe on top of statin therapy lowered ASCVD risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes whose LDL was driven below the previous LDL-C target of <70 mg/dL. In addition, preliminary data assessing the safety of evolocumab and alirocumab on top of statin therapy suggested possible large reductions in ASCVD risk in post hoc analysis. Both the 2016 ACC Consensus Recommendations and the 2015 NLA Recommendations emphasize the importance of maximally tolerated statin therapy, the use of adjunctive non-statin LDL lowering therapy, and the use of LDL-C goals and thresholds to guide intensification of LDL lowering therapy. Although there are some important differences between the ACC Consensus and NLA recommendations in terms of treatment of special populations (i.e., CHF) and on the use of non-HDL-C goals and thresholds, both guidelines support a role for ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrants, and PCSK-9 inhibitors in patients on maximum tolerated statin therapy. The recent positive results of the FOURIER trial gives additional support to the non-statin recommendations of both the ACC and NLA.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The 2013 ACC/AHA Cholesterol guidelines was a major paradigm shift in the management and treatment of dyslipidemia. The new guidelines outlined "statin benefit groups," highlighted weighing the benefit versus risks of statin therapy ("net benefit"), and discussed the importance of shared decision making between patients and providers in primary prevention. While there was widespread agreement on the main groups benefiting from statin therapy, there was significant controversy regarding LDL-C goals and thresholds, the role of non-statin therapy, and the use of statins in specific populations. The goal of this review is to understand the rationale for the updated 2016 ACC Expert Consensus on Non-Statins and to contrast it with the 2015 NLA Recommendations on the Management of Dyslipidemia. RECENT FINDINGS: The findings of the ACC Expert Consensus Panel were largely influenced by the results of several new clinical trials using non-statin therapy in combination with moderate to high intensity statin therapy. The IMPROVE-IT trial demonstrated that ezetimibe on top of statin therapy lowered ASCVD risk in patients with acute coronary syndromes whose LDL was driven below the previous LDL-C target of <70 mg/dL. In addition, preliminary data assessing the safety of evolocumab and alirocumab on top of statin therapy suggested possible large reductions in ASCVD risk in post hoc analysis. Both the 2016 ACC Consensus Recommendations and the 2015 NLA Recommendations emphasize the importance of maximally tolerated statin therapy, the use of adjunctive non-statin LDL lowering therapy, and the use of LDL-C goals and thresholds to guide intensification of LDL lowering therapy. Although there are some important differences between the ACC Consensus and NLA recommendations in terms of treatment of special populations (i.e., CHF) and on the use of non-HDL-C goals and thresholds, both guidelines support a role for ezetimibe, bile acid sequestrants, and PCSK-9 inhibitors in patients on maximum tolerated statin therapy. The recent positive results of the FOURIER trial gives additional support to the non-statin recommendations of both the ACC and NLA.
Authors: Samuel S Gidding; Mary Ann Champagne; Sarah D de Ferranti; Joep Defesche; Matthew K Ito; Joshua W Knowles; Brian McCrindle; Frederick Raal; Daniel Rader; Raul D Santos; Maria Lopes-Virella; Gerald F Watts; Anthony S Wierzbicki Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Donald M Lloyd-Jones; Pamela B Morris; Christie M Ballantyne; Kim K Birtcher; David D Daly; Sondra M DePalma; Margo B Minissian; Carl E Orringer; Sidney C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-04-01 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: William E Boden; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Todd Anderson; Bernard R Chaitman; Patrice Desvignes-Nickens; Kent Koprowicz; Ruth McBride; Koon Teo; William Weintraub Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Christoph Wanner; Vera Krane; Winfried März; Manfred Olschewski; Johannes F E Mann; Günther Ruf; Eberhard Ritz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-07-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Terry A Jacobson; Matthew K Ito; Kevin C Maki; Carl E Orringer; Harold E Bays; Peter H Jones; James M McKenney; Scott M Grundy; Edward A Gill; Robert A Wild; Don P Wilson; W Virgil Brown Journal: J Clin Lipidol Date: 2015-04-07 Impact factor: 4.766
Authors: David Preiss; Ross T Campbell; Heather M Murray; Ian Ford; Chris J Packard; Naveed Sattar; Kazem Rahimi; Helen M Colhoun; David D Waters; John C LaRosa; Pierre Amarenco; Terje R Pedersen; Matti J Tikkanen; Michael J Koren; Neil R Poulter; Peter S Sever; Paul M Ridker; Jean G MacFadyen; Scott D Solomon; Barry R Davis; Lara M Simpson; Haruo Nakamura; Kyoichi Mizuno; Rosa M Marfisi; Roberto Marchioli; Gianni Tognoni; Vasilios G Athyros; Kausik K Ray; Antonio M Gotto; Michael B Clearfield; John R Downs; John J McMurray Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2015-03-23 Impact factor: 29.983