Literature DB >> 28500392

A case of advanced gastric cancer achieved a pathological complete response by chemotherapy.

Kazuhiro Tada1, Tsuyoshi Etoh2, Yuki Shitomi1, Yoshitake Ueda3, Manabu Tojigamori1, Hidefumi Shiroshita1, Norio Shiraishi3, Masafumi Inomata1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although chemotherapy is the first recommended treatment of unresectable gastric cancer, a pathological complete response is a rare event. CASE
PRESENTATION: A 58-year-old male was diagnosed as gastric cancer with a bulky tumor, lymphadenopathy, and suspicious peritoneal dissemination. The patient underwent chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin. After three courses of chemotherapy, a computed tomography showed dramatic improvements in gastric wall thickening, shrinkage of lymphadenopathy, and disappearance of disseminated peritoneal lesion. The patient underwent potentially curative resection by total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection. Histological examination revealed the absence of malignant cells not only in the resected specimen but also in the harvested lymph nodes. At present, more than 7 years after the initial surgery, the patient is still alive without any recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: We obtained a pathological complete response by chemotherapy with S-1 and cisplatin for advanced gastric cancer. Although a pathological complete response is a rare event, it would be associated with the long-term survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced gastric cancer; Long-term survival; Pathological complete response

Year:  2017        PMID: 28500392      PMCID: PMC5429316          DOI: 10.1186/s40792-017-0344-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2198-7793


Background

Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The prognosis of gastric cancer with distant metastasis is extremely unfavorable because of only 15% chance of survival for the next 5 years [1]. According to the guidelines, chemotherapy is the first recommended treatment of unresectable gastric cancer based on clinical trials [2, 3]. The clinical response rate reported for chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer is 28–54% [4-9]. Oral 5-FU was considered gold standard until recently S-1 + cisplatin (SP) replaced it [2, 4]. Several novel combined chemotherapy regimens occasionally have good response for unresectable gastric cancer and subsequently allow potentially curative gastrectomy [10-12]. However, a pathological complete response (pCR) is a rare event even if these powerful regimens are used. Herein, we demonstrate a case achieved a pCR by chemotherapy with S-1 in combination with cisplatin regimen followed by surgery for advanced gastric cancer.

Case presentation

A 58-year-old male suffering from epigastralgia was referred to our hospital. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a type 3 tumor, measuring 95 × 75 mm in diameter in the anterior wall of the gastric corpus. Pathological examination of biopsy specimen revealed moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma (Fig. 1). Computed tomography (CT) showed gastric wall thickening, and a high density of fat around the gastric wall, suggesting tumor infiltration into the gastric serosa. In addition, perigastric lymphadenopathy and multiple nodules in the upper peritoneal cavity were observed. These findings confirmed that the diagnosis of this patient as advanced gastric cancer with suspicious peritoneal dissemination. We diagnosed this patient as T4aN3M1(P). The tumor markers were within normal levels. Then, the patient underwent chemotherapy with the following treatment regimens, considered as one course: S-1 (120 mg/day, days 1–21) and cisplatin (90 mg/body, day 8). After three courses of chemotherapy, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed remarkable tumor shrinkage (Fig. 2a, b). In addition, CT revealed a notable improvement in gastric wall thickening, shrinkage of lymphadenopathy, and disappearance of disseminated lesions in the peritoneal cavity (Fig. 3a–d). Because of the partial response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST ver 1.1) [13], we aimed to perform potentially curative resection after obtaining informed consent from the patient. The diagnosis at the time was T3N1M0. No disseminated tumors and only scar were observed intraoperatively, and the patient successfully underwent potentially curative resection by spleen-preserving total gastrectomy with lymph node dissection of the splenic hilum (No.10). Histological examination of the resected specimen and the harvested lymph nodes revealed that a pCR was achieved because no malignant cells were found (Fig. 4a, b). Furthermore, cytological examination provided no evidence of cancer cells. The postoperative course of the patient was uneventful. The patient received S-1 chemotherapy postoperatively for a period of 1 year and has been regularly attending our clinic for follow-up examination with CT every 6 months. The patient is still alive without any evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease 7 years after the initial surgery.
Fig. 1

Histological findings by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Pathological examination of biopsy specimen revealed moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma

Fig. 2

Macroscopic findings by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. a A type 3 tumor measuring 95 × 75 mm in diameter was identified in the anterior wall of the gastric corpus. b After three courses of chemotherapy, remarkable shrinkage in tumor size was observed

Fig. 3

Computed tomography findings. a Thickening of the gastric wall, high density of fat around the gastric wall (arrow), and perigastric lymphadenopathy (arrowhead). b Perigastric lymphadenopathy (arrow) and multiple disseminated lesions (arrowhead). c Improvement of gastric wall thickening after chemotherapy. d Shrinkage of lymphadenopathy and disappearance of disseminated lesions after chemotherapy

Fig. 4

Histological findings by hematoxylin and eosin staining. a Malignant cells had disappeared in the resected stomach. b Fibrotic tissue was found to have replaced the cancer tissue in the dissected lymph node

Histological findings by hematoxylin and eosin staining. Pathological examination of biopsy specimen revealed moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma Macroscopic findings by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. a A type 3 tumor measuring 95 × 75 mm in diameter was identified in the anterior wall of the gastric corpus. b After three courses of chemotherapy, remarkable shrinkage in tumor size was observed Computed tomography findings. a Thickening of the gastric wall, high density of fat around the gastric wall (arrow), and perigastric lymphadenopathy (arrowhead). b Perigastric lymphadenopathy (arrow) and multiple disseminated lesions (arrowhead). c Improvement of gastric wall thickening after chemotherapy. d Shrinkage of lymphadenopathy and disappearance of disseminated lesions after chemotherapy Histological findings by hematoxylin and eosin staining. a Malignant cells had disappeared in the resected stomach. b Fibrotic tissue was found to have replaced the cancer tissue in the dissected lymph node

Discussion

Chemotherapy is a standard treatment for stage IV gastric cancer, but the effect remains unsatisfactory. In the present report, we have experienced a rare case achieved a pCR by chemotherapy with SP. So far, various regimens such as SP, capecitabine + oxaliplatin (XELOX), and capecitabine + cisplatin (XP) + trastuzumab were used for stage IV gastric cancer. Nowadays, several molecular targets have been developed, showing survival benefits to patients with stage IV gastric cancer [14, 15]. However, most of these chemotherapeutic regimens have a low potential for achieving a complete response (Table 1) [16-18]. Regarding to the impact of a pCR on the long-term survival of patients with gastric cancer, Cho et al. demonstrated that the overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates at 3 and 5 years were 96 and 85 and 91 and 75%, respectively [19]. However, this study included patients with various stages of gastric cancer (resectable stage 15/22; unresectable stage 7/22); not all patients were in stage IV. In our case, the patient is still alive with no evidence of recurrence or metastatic disease 7 years after the initial surgery. Therefore, a pCR induced by chemotherapy could be associated with long-term survival.
Table 1

Complete response rate in cases after chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer

First authorYearClinical trialRegimenEnrollment numberCR rateMST
(%)(Month)
Unresectable stage
 A Ohtsu [7]2003JCOG 92055-FU + CDDP10507.3
 K Yamaguchi [9]2006S-1 + DTX464.314
 W Koizumi [4]2008SPIRITS trialS-1 + CDDP871.113
 Bang Y J [16]2010ToGA trialXP + trastuzumab2945.413.8
Resectable stage
 T Yoshikawa [17]2009JCOG 0001CPT-11 + CDDP492.0a 14.6
 Y Iwasaki [18]2013JCOG 0210S-1 + CDDP472.1a 17.3

MST median survival time, CDDP cisplatin, DTX docetaxel, CPT-11 irinotecan

a pCR pathological complete response

Complete response rate in cases after chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer MST median survival time, CDDP cisplatin, DTX docetaxel, CPT-11 irinotecan a pCR pathological complete response For the decision regarding treatment strategy, an accurate diagnosis is highly essential. Recently, Yoshida et al. proposed a new classification and therapeutic approaches of stage IV gastric cancer [20]. Actually, it is difficult to diagnose peritoneal dissemination prior to treatment. Reportedly, the sensitivity of CT for peritoneal dissemination of gastric cancer was 43–77%, with a specificity of 82–92% [21-23]. The accuracy of positron emission tomography (PET) for peritoneal dissemination was demonstrated 89%, with a sensitivity and specificity of 35–63 and 89–99%, respectively [21-23]. Kawanaka et al. recently indicated high accuracy for detecting peritoneal dissemination with the combination of CT and PET [24]. Therefore, the combination of CT and PET may be useful for diagnosis of peritoneal dissemination. On the other hand, perioperative staging laparoscopy has often been used to detect occult peritoneal metastases in gastrointestinal cancers [25]. In the present case, we did not perform staging laparoscopy prior to chemotherapy because we detected multiple nodules enhanced inhomogeneously in extra gastric area, which suspected the presence of peritoneal dissemination. Previous reports have demonstrated that the best timing for the operation after chemotherapy was after 2 or 4–6 cycles [20, 26]. Although it is difficult to decide the best timing, former reports suggested that partial response after chemotherapy may be a good indicator for surgery. In this case, we chose surgical treatment after three courses of chemotherapy because of good response. Surgery after chemotherapy is considered to be complicated because of the presence of bulky tumor or post-chemotherapy compared to surgery without chemotherapy. There might be increased blood loss due to prolonged operation time because of fibrotic changes, adherence to adjacent organs, and a wet operative field which may be caused by chemotherapy. Previous reports have demonstrated that the incidence of complications is not significantly higher than that in patients who underwent conventional radical surgery for gastric cancer [17, 27]. Indeed, in our case, the postoperative course of the patient was uneventful. In the future, the morbidity and mortality in such patients who underwent additional surgery should be evaluated using well-designed clinical trial.

Conclusions

We encountered a rare case achieved a pCR with advanced gastric cancer treated by standard regimen (SP). It is suggested that a pCR induced by chemotherapy and potentially curative resection after intensive chemotherapy could enhance the probability of longer survival.
  26 in total

1.  Induction of a pathological complete response by four courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: early results of the randomized phase II COMPASS trial.

Authors:  Takaki Yoshikawa; Kazuaki Tanabe; Kazuhiro Nishikawa; Yuichi Ito; Takanori Matsui; Yutaka Kimura; Naoki Hirabayashi; Shoki Mikata; Makoto Iwahashi; Ryoji Fukushima; Nobuhiro Takiguchi; Isao Miyashiro; Satoshi Morita; Yumi Miyashita; Aakira Tsuburaya; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study Group.

Authors:  Eric Van Cutsem; Vladimir M Moiseyenko; Sergei Tjulandin; Alejandro Majlis; Manuel Constenla; Corrado Boni; Adriano Rodrigues; Miguel Fodor; Yee Chao; Edouard Voznyi; Marie-Laure Risse; Jaffer A Ajani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial.

Authors:  Wasaburo Koizumi; Hiroyuki Narahara; Takuo Hara; Akinori Takagane; Toshikazu Akiya; Masakazu Takagi; Kosei Miyashita; Takashi Nishizaki; Osamu Kobayashi; Wataru Takiyama; Yasushi Toh; Takashi Nagaie; Seiichi Takagi; Yoshitaka Yamamura; Kimihiko Yanaoka; Hiroyuki Orita; Masahiro Takeuchi
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer.

Authors:  David Cunningham; Naureen Starling; Sheela Rao; Timothy Iveson; Marianne Nicolson; Fareeda Coxon; Gary Middleton; Francis Daniel; Jacqueline Oates; Andrew Richard Norman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extended surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  T Yoshikawa; M Sasako; S Yamamoto; T Sano; H Imamura; K Fujitani; H Oshita; S Ito; Y Kawashima; N Fukushima
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

6.  Ramucirumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel in patients with previously treated advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (RAINBOW): a double-blind, randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Hansjochen Wilke; Kei Muro; Eric Van Cutsem; Sang-Cheul Oh; György Bodoky; Yasuhiro Shimada; Shuichi Hironaka; Naotoshi Sugimoto; Oleg Lipatov; Tae-You Kim; David Cunningham; Philippe Rougier; Yoshito Komatsu; Jaffer Ajani; Michael Emig; Roberto Carlesi; David Ferry; Kumari Chandrawansa; Jonathan D Schwartz; Atsushi Ohtsu
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Gastric cancer, version 2.2013: featured updates to the NCCN Guidelines.

Authors:  Jaffer A Ajani; David J Bentrem; Stephen Besh; Thomas A D'Amico; Prajnan Das; Crystal Denlinger; Marwan G Fakih; Charles S Fuchs; Hans Gerdes; Robert E Glasgow; James A Hayman; Wayne L Hofstetter; David H Ilson; Rajesh N Keswani; Lawrence R Kleinberg; W Michael Korn; A Craig Lockhart; Kenneth Meredith; Mary F Mulcahy; Mark B Orringer; James A Posey; Aaron R Sasson; Walter J Scott; Vivian E Strong; Thomas K Varghese; Graham Warren; Mary Kay Washington; Christopher Willett; Cameron D Wright; Nicole R McMillian; Hema Sundar
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 11.908

8.  Randomized phase III trial of fluorouracil alone versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin versus uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin in patients with unresectable, advanced gastric cancer: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205).

Authors:  Atsushi Ohtsu; Yasuhiro Shimada; Kuniaki Shirao; Narikazu Boku; Ichinosuke Hyodo; Hiroshi Saito; Noboru Yamamichi; Yoshinori Miyata; Nobumasa Ikeda; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Haruhiko Fukuda; Shigeaki Yoshida
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phase I/II study of docetaxel and S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  K Yamaguchi; T Shimamura; I Hyodo; W Koizumi; T Doi; H Narahara; Y Komatsu; T Kato; S Saitoh; T Akiya; M Munakata; Y Miyata; Y Maeda; H Takiuchi; S Nakano; T Esaki; F Kinjo; Y Sakata
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  A phase II trial of Xeloda and oxaliplatin (XELOX) neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery for advanced gastric cancer patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Yi-yi Yu; Wei Li; Yi Feng; Jun Hou; Yuan Ji; Yi-hong Sun; Kun-tang Shen; Zhen-bin Shen; Xin-yu Qin; Tian-shu Liu
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 3.333

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pathological Complete Response by S-1 Chemotherapy in Advanced Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Tsutomu Namikawa; Nobuko Ishida; Sachi Tsuda; Kazune Fujisawa; Eri Munekage; Jun Iwabu; Masaya Munekage; Sunao Uemura; Shigehiro Tsujii; Hiromichi Maeda; Hiroyuki Kitagawa; Michiya Kobayashi; Kazuhiro Hanazaki
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

2.  ENDOSCOPIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WITH COMPLETE PATHOLOGICAL RESPONSE AFTER NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY FOR GASTRIC AND ESOPHAGOGASTRIC JUNCTION ADENOCARCINOMAS.

Authors:  Juliana Silveira Lima de Castro; Adriane Graicer Pelosof; João Guilherme Guerra de Andrade-Cabral; Alvaro Moura Seraphim; Eloy Taglieri; Felipe Jose Fernandez Coimbra; Claudia Zitron
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2022-01-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.