Literature DB >> 28499738

Cognitive effects of subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation in rats.

Melanie Klarer1, Ulrike Weber-Stadlbauer2, Myrtha Arnold3, Wolfgang Langhans4, Urs Meyer5.   

Abstract

Vagal afferents are a crucial neuronal component of the gut-brain axis and mediate the information flow from the viscera to the central nervous system. Based on the findings provided by experiments involving vagus nerve stimulation, it has been suggested that vagal afferent signaling may influence various cognitive functions such as recognition memory and cognitive flexibility. Here, we examined this hypothesis using a rat model of subdiaphragmatic vagal deafferentation (SDA), the most complete and selective abdominal vagal deafferentation method existing to date. We found that SDA did not affect working memory in a nonspatial alternation task, nor did it influence short-, intermediate-, and long-term object recognition memory. SDA did also not affect the acquisition of positively reinforced left-right discrimination learning, but it facilitated the subsequent reversal left-right discrimination learning. The SDA-induced effects on reversal learning emerged in the absence of concomitant changes in motivation towards the positive reinforcer, indicating selective effects on cognitive flexibility. Taken together, these findings suggest that the relative contribution of vagal afferent signaling to cognitive functions is limited. At the same time, our study demonstrates that cognitive flexibility, at least in the domains of positively reinforced learning, is subjected to visceral modulation through abdominal vagal afferents.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive flexibility; Recognition memory; Reversal learning; Vagus nerve; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28499738     DOI: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem        ISSN: 1074-7427            Impact factor:   2.877


  7 in total

Review 1.  Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems.

Authors:  Clarissa M Liu; Scott E Kanoski
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-02-05

Review 2.  Vagal Interoceptive Modulation of Motivated Behavior.

Authors:  J W Maniscalco; L Rinaman
Journal:  Physiology (Bethesda)       Date:  2018-03-01

3.  The physiological control of eating: signals, neurons, and networks.

Authors:  Alan G Watts; Scott E Kanoski; Graciela Sanchez-Watts; Wolfgang Langhans
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2021-09-06       Impact factor: 37.312

Review 4.  Diet-induced dysbiosis of the maternal gut microbiome in early life programming of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors:  Claudia M Di Gesù; Lisa M Matz; Shelly A Buffington
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.904

Review 5.  Trigeminal, Visceral and Vestibular Inputs May Improve Cognitive Functions by Acting through the Locus Coeruleus and the Ascending Reticular Activating System: A New Hypothesis.

Authors:  Vincenzo De Cicco; Maria P Tramonti Fantozzi; Enrico Cataldo; Massimo Barresi; Luca Bruschini; Ugo Faraguna; Diego Manzoni
Journal:  Front Neuroanat       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.856

6.  Gut vagal sensory signaling regulates hippocampus function through multi-order pathways.

Authors:  Andrea N Suarez; Ted M Hsu; Clarissa M Liu; Emily E Noble; Alyssa M Cortella; Emily M Nakamoto; Joel D Hahn; Guillaume de Lartigue; Scott E Kanoski
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 7.  Regulation of Memory Function by Feeding-Relevant Biological Systems: Following the Breadcrumbs to the Hippocampus.

Authors:  Andrea N Suarez; Emily E Noble; Scott E Kanoski
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 5.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.