Literature DB >> 28499707

Lower Laser Energy Levels Lead to Better Visual Recovery After Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction: Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yong Woo Ji1, Minseo Kim2, David Sung Yong Kang3, Dan Z Reinstein4, Timothy J Archer5, Jin Young Choi3, Eung Kweon Kim1, Hyung Keun Lee1, Kyoung Yul Seo1, Tae-Im Kim6.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of lowering laser energy on clinical outcomes in small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
DESIGN: Prospective randomized clinical trial.
METHODS: A total of 151 patients (151 eyes) with moderate myopia scheduled for SMILE were included: 58 eyes received SMILE with low energy (100, 105, and 110 nJ; L-SMILE group) and 93 with conventional energy (115-150 nJ; C-SMILE group). Patients received complete ophthalmic examinations preoperatively and over 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Uncorrected distance visual acuity (logMAR UDVA) 1 day and 1 week postoperatively was significantly better in L-SMILE than in C-SMILE (P < .001 and P = .005, respectively). There was no significant difference between the groups at 1 and 3 months. L-SMILE induced significantly fewer corneal aberrations compared with C-SMILE at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively (both P < .01), but there were no significant differences at 3 months. Though there was no difference in logMAR UDVA over the postoperative period between the 100, 105, and 110 nJ subgroups, there was a significant difference in logMAR UDVA on postoperative day 1 between L-SMILE and each subgroup in which an energy level of 115 nJ or higher was used. Furthermore, logMAR UDVA on postoperative day 1 showed a significant correlation with laser energy (r = 0.451, P < .001) and multiple linear regression analysis revealed that energy level was the only independent factor associated with logMAR UDVA on postoperative day 1 (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: SMILE using femtosecond energy of less than 115 nJ facilitates better visual acuity with less induction of corneal aberrations in the early postoperative period.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28499707     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  11 in total

1.  Visual recovery after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in relation to pre-operative spherical equivalent.

Authors:  Eugene Tay; Ram Bajpai
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Enhancement of refractive outcomes of small-incision lenticule extraction via tear-film control.

Authors:  Il Hwan Koh; Kyoung Yul Seo; Seong Bae Park; Hun Yang; InSik Kim; Sang Min Nam
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-29       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Initial Single-Site Surgical Experience with SMILE: A Comparison of Results to FDA SMILE, and the Earliest and Latest Generation of LASIK.

Authors:  Majid Moshirfar; Michael S Murri; Tirth J Shah; Steven H Linn; Yasmyne Ronquillo; Orry C Birdsong; Phillips C Hoopes
Journal:  Ophthalmol Ther       Date:  2018-06-29

Review 5.  Decade - long journey with small incision lenticule extraction: The learnings.

Authors:  Gitansha S Sachdev; Shreyas Ramamurthy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 6.  Complications of small incision lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Mohamed Ibrahime Asif; Rahul Kumar Bafna; Jodhbir Singh Mehta; Jagadesh Reddy; Jeewan Singh Titiyal; Prafulla K Maharana; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  The correction of conjunctivochalasis using high-frequency radiowave electrosurgery improves dry eye disease.

Authors:  Yong Woo Ji; Hyojin Seong; Sujung Lee; Mutlaq Hamad Alotaibi; Tae-Im Kim; Hyung Keun Lee; Kyoung Yul Seo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Ex-vivo study on the surface quality of corneal lenticule and stroma after low energy femtosecond laser lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Mayank A Nanavaty; Hasan Naveed; Zahra Ashena; Ritika Mukhija
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 9.  Advances in refractive corneal lenticule extraction.

Authors:  Matthias Fuest; Jodhbir S Mehta
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-24

10.  Effect of Cap-Lenticule Diameter Difference on the Visual Outcome and Higher-Order Aberrations in SMILE: 0.4 mm versus 1.0 mm.

Authors:  Banu Torun Acar; Suphi Acar
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 1.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.